Trains.com

Lifeblood of the industry (coffee of course)

11357 views
273 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Thursday, January 28, 2016 6:08 PM

Back before everybody had air conditioning, too!

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, January 28, 2016 5:59 PM

Convicted One
I'm from a little town skirting Atlanta called "Vinings".

Cobb County.  Hmm.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, January 28, 2016 5:42 PM

Paul of Covington

   Sometimes I wonder what goes on in some people's minds.

So do they!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Thursday, January 28, 2016 5:27 PM

   Sometimes I wonder what goes on in some people's minds.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Thursday, January 28, 2016 5:20 PM

ouibejamn
Would have made a great album cover

 

Here is a larger version:  link

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Thursday, January 28, 2016 4:16 PM

Murphy Siding
Is Fort Wayne your hometown?

 

I'm from a little town skirting Atlanta called "Vinings".

 

The people in the photo look like real cappuccino drinkers to me (foamers)Moon

 

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, January 28, 2016 1:12 PM
Norm48327
 
Euclid
Norm, I don’t follow your point in this exchange.

 

It was somewhat a play on the phrase about the lesser educated regarding things they discover on line. Some are the type P.T. Barnum spoke of who are so gullible as to believe almost anything they are told or read. They either lack the mental capacity or the incentive to further research; they simply take what they read as gospel. They are the ones the "Nigerian prince" scammers can easily convince they need to send money to be able to claim their new-found fortune. 

Capiche?

 

Oh sure, I understand that things claimed on the Internet are not necessarily true.  But then why did you say this?  This has nothing to do with whether the Internet is reliable.  Here you sound like a denier of the proven science of manmade climate change:
 
Posted by Norm48327 on Thursday, January 28, 2016 6:35 AM
schlimm
Oh right out of Rush's playbook. Blame the press and the climate scientist conspiracy. You know about railroads but know nothing of how academia works.
 
"The sky is falling! The sky is falling!"
Well, we'll find out in due time whether that is true or false. In the meantime we watch wih amusement while the academic community tries it's best to sell their theory to the masses. When working with unknowns, academia has often found itself on the wrong track while in pursuit of truth. Are you saying there is no possibility they could be wrong? They are certainly spending an enormous amount of time and money trying convincing us they're right. Meanwhile, Al Gore sells his carbon credits for a tidy profit while continuing his opulent lifestyle.
Like a boss once said to an employee: "Tell me again how good you are. I'm beginning to lose faith". 
Norm
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, January 28, 2016 1:04 PM

tree68
 
Murphy Siding

    Unknown beans?  Livin' on the edge!Laugh 

 

 

I was thinking the same thing!  Kinda like taking all the labels off the canned food...

 

 

Not recommended if you have pets.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:56 PM

Euclid
Norm, I don’t follow your point in this exchange.

It was somewhat a play on the phrase about the lesser educated regarding things they discover on line. Some are the type P.T. Barnum spoke of who are so gullible as to believe almost anything they are told or read. They either lack the mental capacity or the incentive to further research; they simply take what they read as gospel. They are the ones the "Nigerian prince" scammers can easily convince they need to send money to be able to claim their new-found fortune. 

Capiche?

Norm


  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:42 PM

schlimm

well grounded The coffee was

not burned like a French roast

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, January 28, 2016 11:55 AM

schlimm

I think the broad findings support AGCC, but specific regional impacts are much less well grounded.

The coffee was very good. Robust but not burned like a French roast is in US.

 

I really prefer drinking coffee, not charcoal. Do the people who like burnt coffee feel that they need cleansing inside?Smile

Good, the emoticn went where I wanted it to go!

Johnny

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, January 28, 2016 11:45 AM

I think the broad findings support AGCC, but specific regional impacts are much less well grounded.

The coffee was very good. Robust but not burned like a French roast is in US.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Thursday, January 28, 2016 11:41 AM

Euclid
In your my original comment, I posted an article about how global warming is hurting coffee production which requires cool temperatures. You responded by implying that the article is false because it is on the Internet. But then you told Schlimm that you were not taking either side of the debate.

There are two different things going on here.  One of which is the existence of meaningful levels of anthropogenic global warming (now politically-correctly renamed 'anthropogenic climate change'*, and the other of which is a report (which I have not yet read) purporting to implicate climate change as the cause of "significant impact on coffee production" in a particular geographic area.  There is significant 'settled science' in the former, and almost certainly a large number of unproven (or insufficiently-documented) assertions in the latter.  I do not think Norm was mistaken in treating it as 'more stuff you read on the Internet' before reading it, as long as he does read it (and understand it properly) and changes his opinion if the science is, in fact, either good or defensible.

I did not originally care much for the way the phys.org report was phrasing some of its claims, for example (in prose that uses commas improperly) assuming that trends observed up to 2012 could be extrapolated to 2060 without specifically providing the assumptions used.  But I find to my delight that the link to the original paper actually brings up the full paper, not just the abstract, so we can determine how well Craparo et al. have actually done

In any case, before we get into that oh-so-familiar shooting of the messenger, I'm glad you provided the reference for us, and I'm looking forward to having time to read it.

 

*I think we need to come up with some all-Greek or all-Latin term for the subject, as I was taught needed to happen - 'television' coming in for criticism because it mixes a Latin root and a Greek prefix...)

NOTE:  The original coffee thread was, in my opinion, "railroad-related" because coffee is a substance that is the 'lifeblood' of the railroad industry, and many railroaders and railfans alike may want to discuss the finer nuances of that lifeblood.  I am not nearly as sanguine that a global-warming discussion passes the railroad-content smell test, and while I think certain posters are being a bit 'doctrinaire' in insisting posts have railroad 'relevance', I think it is difficult to deny that a global-warming discussion of coffee has crossed the invisible line that convicted one (and 'official' stated Kalmbach policy, if that applies) has drawn.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, January 28, 2016 11:36 AM

tree68

 

 
Murphy Siding

    Unknown beans?  Livin' on the edge!Laugh 

 

 

I was thinking the same thing!  Kinda like taking all the labels off the canned food...

 

 

Nah.  Some whole beans I bought a while back.  Transferred to a large jar, sealed and keep in the freezer.  The label is gone, but I think Sumatra, medium to dark roast.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, January 28, 2016 11:13 AM

Murphy Siding

    Unknown beans?  Livin' on the edge!Laugh 

I was thinking the same thing!  Kinda like taking all the labels off the canned food...

 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, January 28, 2016 10:36 AM
Norm48327
 
Euclid
LIFEBLOOD of the INDUSTRY THREATENED WITH EXTINCTION by CLIMATE CHANGE
 
 

“Scientists have provided the first on-the-ground evidence that climate change has already had a substantial impact on coffee production in the East African Highlands region, according to a recently published paper in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.”

 

 

 

You read it on the internet so it must be true (NOT). Sad

Edit: My smilie landed where I wanted it to.

 

Further quotes:
Schlimm:
"Unlike some members on here, and not relying on the media or the blogosphere, both NOAA and NASA said 2014 was the hottest year on earth in the ~140 years of records. And caused primarily by man. And 2015 broke that."
Norm:
"I was not taking either side of the debate. I was merely pointing out that there is good and bad information out there. Separating the wheat from the chaff can sometimes be daunting."
 
 
Norm, I don’t follow your point in this exchange.  In your my original comment, I posted an article about how global warming is hurting coffee production which requires cool temperatures.  You responded by implying that the article is false because it is on the Internet.  But then you told Schlimm that you were not taking either side of the debate. 
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, January 28, 2016 10:05 AM

    Unknown beans?  Livin' on the edge!Laugh 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, January 28, 2016 9:39 AM

Murphy Siding

    In my best Peter Sellers as President Merkin Muffley voice from Dr. Strangelove:  "Gentlemen.  You can't fight in here.  This is the war room.".....  Gentlemen, you can't fight about global warming in here.  This is the Trains Magazine Forums to talk about.....coffee.Whistling

 

Norm and I never argue, just discuss stuff in a civil fashion.  Back to coffee.  I resumed grinding some unknown beans this morning in my Peugeot hand grinder (with a helical grinder) and brewing as usual in the French press.

Sehr gut, mein Freund von SD!

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Thursday, January 28, 2016 8:55 AM

And some posters still rely on the old saw of the science being settled. Were that true, we'd still be living on a flat earth. Science is never settled. One discovery leads to another but that doesn't always mean the outcome of the research is settled and true.

Norm


  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, January 28, 2016 8:50 AM

    In my best Peter Sellers as President Merkin Muffley voice from Dr. Strangelove:  "Gentlemen.  You can't fight in here.  This is the war room.".....  Gentlemen, you can't fight about global warming in here.  This is the Trains Magazine Forums to talk about.....coffee.Whistling

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, January 28, 2016 8:30 AM

Norm48327

 

 
schlimm
Oh right out of Rush's playbook. Blame the press and the climate scientist conspiracy. You know about railroads but know nothing of how academia works.

 

"The sky is falling! The sky is falling!"

Well, we'll find out in due time whether that is true or false. In the meantime we watch wih amusement while the academic community tries it's best to sell their theory to the masses. When working with unknowns, academia has often found itself on the wrong track while in pursuit of truth. Are you saying there is no possibility they could be wrong? They are certainly spending an enormous amount of time and money trying convincing us they're right. Meanwhile, Al Gore sells his carbon credits for a tidy profit while continuing his opulent lifestyle.

Like a boss once said to an employee: "Tell me again how good you are. I'm beginning to lose faith".  Big Smile

 

Science has brought us many discoveries, among them a round earth, discoveries of bacteria and other biomed advance, atomic energy, the space program, computers, internet and on and on.  But I guess yoiu are a skeptic about the reality of those also?

Newsflash!  Almost nobody in climate science or progressives pay any attention to Al Gore.   You betray your out-of-date, irrelevant sources to even mention him.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Thursday, January 28, 2016 6:35 AM

schlimm
Oh right out of Rush's playbook. Blame the press and the climate scientist conspiracy. You know about railroads but know nothing of how academia works.

"The sky is falling! The sky is falling!"

Well, we'll find out in due time whether that is true or false. In the meantime we watch wih amusement while the academic community tries it's best to sell their theory to the masses. When working with unknowns, academia has often found itself on the wrong track while in pursuit of truth. Are you saying there is no possibility they could be wrong? They are certainly spending an enormous amount of time and money trying convincing us they're right. Meanwhile, Al Gore sells his carbon credits for a tidy profit while continuing his opulent lifestyle.

Like a boss once said to an employee: "Tell me again how good you are. I'm beginning to lose faith".  Big Smile

Norm


  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, January 27, 2016 10:20 PM

schlimm
Oh right out of Rush's playbook.  Blame the press and the climate scientist conspiracy.  You know about railroads but know nothing of how academia works.

Never watched or listened to him, so he's not a factor.  I've drawn my own conclusions.

Like anything else, if you follow the money, you find lots of interesting things.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, January 27, 2016 9:44 PM

tree68

 

 
BaltACD
And the Earth is 4.5 BILLION years old - 140 +/- years of records explain how much of those 4.5 billion years?

 

Bingo!  Remember that one volcanic eruption (Krakatoa) dropped the global temperature several degrees for several years.  The shortsighted way people look at things these days, the press would have been rife with reports that we were headed for an ice age!

While things are getting warmer, and mankind may well be responsible for some portion of it, blaming mankind completely for climate change is a human conceit.  And a moneymaker for some few people who've figured out how to milk it...

 

 

Oh right out of Rush's playbook.  Blame the press and the climate scientist conspiracy.  You know about railroads but know nothing of how academia works.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, January 27, 2016 8:06 PM

BaltACD
And the Earth is 4.5 BILLION years old - 140 +/- years of records explain how much of those 4.5 billion years?

Bingo!  Remember that one volcanic eruption (Krakatoa) dropped the global temperature several degrees for several years.  The shortsighted way people look at things these days, the press would have been rife with reports that we were headed for an ice age!

While things are getting warmer, and mankind may well be responsible for some portion of it, blaming mankind completely for climate change is a human conceit.  And a moneymaker for some few people who've figured out how to milk it...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, January 27, 2016 8:06 PM

Convicted One

 

 
Murphy Siding
Have you come up with a good train subject yet?

 

 

We could talk about this picture:

 

 

 It appears that the organizers of the event worked with the railroad, so as not to get anybody squooshed by a train.  Notice nobody on the tracks themselves.  The bridge seems to have a decent paint job.  I know there are some folks out there that gauge a railroad's effectiveness by how well their bridges are painted.Wink  Is Fort Wayne your hometown?  Bonus> the emoticon landed where I wanted it to land.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:16 PM

Norm48327
I was not taking either side of the debate. I was merely pointing out that there is good and bad information out there. Separating the wheat from the chaff can sometimes be daunting.

Absolutely!   I don't even bother to try to correct science deniers.  But I will take on progressives who present weak info on a host of topics.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:07 PM

BaltACD
140 +/- years of records explain how much of those 4.5 billion years?

 

 Can't change what happened 4.5 billion years ago, but we can change what we might do tomorrow.  Storm

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:03 PM

schlimm

Unlike some members on here, and not relying on the media or the blogosphere, both NOAA and NASA said 2014 was the hottest year on earth in the ~140 years of records. And caused primarily by man.  And 2015 broke that.

And the Earth is 4.5 BILLION years old - 140 +/- years of records explain how much of those 4.5 billion years?

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy