Trains.com

What's going on at UP?

6507 views
73 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Sunday, June 28, 2015 10:11 PM

Euclid
.....We are a unique situation where the economy is very weak, but reported to be the opposite.  Listening to the news gives the impression that our economy has never been better.  So there is a grand disconnect in the state of the economy.   
 

Well, there is an election on the horizon.

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,417 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Sunday, June 28, 2015 9:10 PM

Euclid
 
I don’t think it is the fault of the coal companies.  The industry has invested in cleaning up emissions, and has come a long way.  But a whole new dimension of emissions has been added to the problem with the decision that CO2 emissions are destroying the planet... 

 
If you look at the EIA link in the earlier post, you see that most of the coal plants retired this year are small plants where the power companies don't want to install the old mercury clean-up technology.  Power companies have invested little in CO2 capture technologies, like sequesterization, even with some federal stimulus money.  They are close to getting a construction commitment for one in Texas.  Interestingly it will be financed by China.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,790 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Sunday, June 28, 2015 8:40 PM

Typical economic slump rule for railroads....First to suffer, Last to recover.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,632 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Sunday, June 28, 2015 8:25 PM

UP is well positioned to haul a significant amount of automotive materials in and finished automobiles out of Mexico from approximately 8 new automobile assembly plants coming on line in the next several years. In addition, there is a significant amount of additional manufacturing investment coming on line in Mexico in that time frame. UP will also be benefitting from significant expansions of refineries and plastics manufacturing as a result of the increase in low cost natural gas feedstocks resulting from the fracking boom. CMStPnP's sage comments on the long term prospects for UP are well-founded. 

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,864 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, June 28, 2015 5:13 PM

Not mentioned above but I believe also the Federal Government has hinted it will not be flexible on the PTC implementation deadline and will fine carriers on a per day basis for being out of compliance.    The fines are pretty steep.   UP is far behind in it's PTC implementation.     Also it is a big hauler of Powder River Basin Coal and I believe other shipments are softening as well.      UP is a good buy long-term and I am a major investor.    Can't go wrong with them.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,155 posts
Posted by Euclid on Sunday, June 28, 2015 8:13 AM
Lake

kgbw49, this is the fault of the coal producers and users. No one else.

They have had many years to work out a system to make coal fired electrical producing plants emissions way less.
But, they have done what big business is good at, and that is ignoring the problem.

They are spending millions of dollars to fight regulations, instead of putting the money in research to solve the problem.
The worst that can happen is the top executives of a company, file to shut down a coal fired generation plant, pocket the golden parachutes they have given themselves, and laugh all the way to a great retirement as they pass all of the people they put out of work.

This is the same as it has been, is, and will be.

 
I don’t think it is the fault of the coal companies.  The industry has invested in cleaning up emissions, and has come a long way.  But a whole new dimension of emissions has been added to the problem with the decision that CO2 emissions are destroying the planet.  If you want to see what is killing coal, look to the people who have said they intend to do kill coal.  kgbw49 has it right.  Renewable energy will only become viable with a huge price increase and the consequential price rationing that results. 
We are a unique situation where the economy is very weak, but reported to be the opposite.  Listening to the news gives the impression that our economy has never been better.  So there is a grand disconnect in the state of the economy.  I do not expect it to ever recover to robust growth.   
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Clearlake, California. USA
  • 869 posts
Posted by Lake on Saturday, June 27, 2015 10:48 PM

kgbw49, this is the fault of the coal producers and users. No one else.

They have had many years to work out a system to make coal fired electrical producing plants emissions way less.
But, they have done what big business is good at, and that is ignoring the problem.

They are spending millions of dollars to fight regulations, instead of putting the money in research to solve the problem.
The worst that can happen is the top executives of a company, file to shut down a coal fired generation plant, pocket the golden parachutes they have given themselves, and laugh all the way to a great retirement as they pass all of the people they put out of work.

This is the same as it has been, is, and will be.

Ken G Price   My N-Scale Layout

Digitrax Super Empire Builder Radio System. South Valley Texas Railroad. SVTRR

N-Scale out west. 1996-1998 or so! UP, SP, Missouri Pacific, C&NW.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,632 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Saturday, June 27, 2015 6:16 PM

New EPA regulations to take effect in 2016 will force the shut down of perhaps over 6 dozen major coal plants.

http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=20292

Wind and solar are being publicized as offsetting the baseload coal plant retirements, but having worked in the electrical industry for a period of time, the unknown fact to most of the public is that wind and solar are only able to operate a fraction of the time compared to a 24-hour-per-day baseload coal plant, and the capital costs to hook to the grid are very expensive per kilowatt hour generated compared to a baseload station.

Both wind and solar are typically more expensive per kilowatt hour generated, and that is why utility companies will typically charge a premium if you wish to claim that the kilowatt hours on your bill were all generated by wind or solar.

Natural gas can fill in as a baseload substitute and thankfully fracking is allowing some of that to happen, but pipeline infrastructure will have to be increased to make that more viable as a substitute. And of course, it is only a viable substitute if fracking for natural gas is allowed to continue in order to keep supply of natural gas at a point where it is economical.

The bottom line is, whatever our current electric bills are, we can expect increases year after year after year as baseload  coal slowly gets strangled by EPA regulation out of existence.

It might not be too much of an exaggeration to say that in our children's lifetimes,with the direction America is being taken by Washington regulatory policies, the passing of a unit coal train could become as rare an occurence as the passing of a circus train.

Railroads are most certainly already having their economists on staff "wargaming" these various scenarios. We already see major capital investment shifting to intermodal corridors and away from coal corridors for the most part.

Look for large portions of branch lines in West Virginia and Kentucky to be spun off to shortlines, a slow down or elimination of future double track expansion on the BNSF across Iowa, and perhaps the Powder River Basin four track main line to be reduced down to three tracks as further telltale signs in addition to those signs already spotted by other contributors to this thread.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 575 posts
Posted by alphas on Saturday, June 27, 2015 9:44 AM

Coal traffic isn't just being hit by natural gas prices.    The current Fed government administration is very unfriendly towards coal's role in power production and also has no interest in promoting its export abroad.    As long as that's the governing policy from DC, there is no future for anyone, including the RR's, when it comes to coal.    If I was a RR whose revenues included hauling a lot of coal used for power plants, I'd be quite concerned about my long-term financial picture.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,803 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Saturday, June 27, 2015 9:21 AM

A number of factors including a sluggish economy and world events are putting downward pressure on most stocks. We're overdue for a bear market anyway, so expect at least 9 to 12 months of stock declines, maybe longer depending on how events in Greece play out. Railroads for the most part appear to be strong viable businesses, so from that standpoint I wouldn't be overly concerned unless you're planning on drawing from your investments over the next five years... otherwise,  fasten your seatbelt and enjoy the ride!

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,918 posts
Posted by MP173 on Saturday, June 27, 2015 8:26 AM

Take a look at the AAR weekly carloadings report for UP...

Coal YTD is down 17% (oh crap)

All carload commodities down 7% (oh crap)

13 of the 19 commodities are down YTD vs 2014 (oh crap)

Intermodal is flat (actually down slightly) YTD (oh crap)

When big coal starts melting away, the rails have problems.  It is the engine which runs the railroad, which allows the big expenditures, shiny locomotives, and bright future.  The natural gas prices due to fracking are eating away at the PRB coal movements.  Everything else is trending lower, which in itself wouldnt be an issue, but when coal is down by nearly 20% ....think about it 100 trains a year ago are now 80 trains.  That is alot of parked locomotives and people sitting at home awaiting a phone call.

Ed

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Saturday, June 27, 2015 7:19 AM

The railroads are all down from their highs of a few months ago, when both UP and KCS, for instance, were tickling $125. CP was at nearly $200. I'm no expert and haven't done the math, but I think the price was too high across the board as a multiple of earnings. 

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,492 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, June 27, 2015 6:50 AM

Stock price can be related to a lot more than the condition of the business.  I've noticed that some financial writers are suggesting that the stock market may be on the cusp of another bubble.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,991 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, June 26, 2015 10:37 PM

Summer lull and a stagnent economy.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Midwestern U.S.
  • 99 posts
What's going on at UP?
Posted by iawestern on Friday, June 26, 2015 9:21 PM

Jim Wrinn mentioned in his latest blog about many engines being stored and several hundred crew members being furloughed.  I knew that traffic these days was soft, but not that soft.  I have observed here in the last week or so that UP's stock price is losing about $1-2 almost daily.  Not the typical info that I hear and see about UP.

Is this all attributed to overall traffic levels being down?  Are all of the other class 1s experiencing the same comparative lower levels?

Mark VW

 

 

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy