Trains.com

Tunnel flooding again.

1237 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,279 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, December 2, 2014 9:17 PM

blue streak 1

Reading the sketchy link a river bank burst its banks both September and the latest one.  That is not a 500 year flood but a close by river .  So why did the Spanish not build a temporary berm around the shaft until a permanent fix for the problem could be done ?

Sounds like bureacratic ineptitude..

 

Sounds like Spanish & French hubris!  That river wouldn't dare flood our tunnel!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Tuesday, December 2, 2014 9:15 PM

BaltACD
.  Couple that with the 'Weather Media' trying to out hype each other on storm severity and......

 Like the current trend to now name every winter storm, big or small.  I'd like to suggest that the next *named* winter storms, in order, be named Larry, Curly, Moe, Huey, Dewey, and Louis. Grumpy

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Tuesday, December 2, 2014 7:22 PM

Reading the sketchy link a river bank burst its banks both September and the latest one.  That is not a 500 year flood but a close by river .  So why did the Spanish not build a temporary berm around the shaft until a permanent fix for the problem could be done ?

Sounds like bureacratic ineptitude..

  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: Northern Florida
  • 1,429 posts
Posted by SALfan on Tuesday, December 2, 2014 7:09 PM

When I worked on a national forest in Arkansas, we had two "100-year floods" in less than two years.  The local road contractors and their equipment suppliers were pretty happy for about three years.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Tuesday, December 2, 2014 3:10 PM

Balt, you certainly speak the truth. Our "weather guessers" make the best use they can of past weather--and often fail to warn us of something which is extraordinary.--About six years ago, we had a unusually heavy snow Christmas night which broke tree branches and they, in turn, broke power lines. We had bought a kerosene heater several years before and had never used it; we were very glad to have the use of it for about a day and a half. Perhaps that was the 500 year Christmas storm?

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,279 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, December 2, 2014 2:56 PM

blue streak 1

BALT   --  My question was why wasn't the shaft opening raised above any 500 year flood possibility.  Maybe Mario can fill us in more ?

 

Should have hung the sarcasm tag.

Since we have only been keeping accurate weather records in most of the world for 150-200 years - we have NO ACCURATE IDEA of what a real 500 year storm is.  Couple that with the 'Weather Media' trying to out hype each other on storm severity and what we really have is a innacurate understanding of what the 'limits' of the weather are.  We have to understand, Ma Nature is not bound by 'man specified' limits.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Tuesday, December 2, 2014 4:47 AM

mudchicken
EmbarrassedEmbarrassedEmbarrassed Wanna place a bet on a new design minimum in the 'ol design manual appearing soon? Tunnels never behave as intended.

 

 

Once again Mudchicken has made a profound assestment.  "Tunels never behave as intended" causes us to realize why  there are so many quirks on any tunnel.

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, December 2, 2014 1:45 AM

 

blue streak 1

BALT   --  My question was why wasn't the shaft opening raised above any 500 year flood possibility.  Maybe Mario can fill us in more ?

Engineers probably over-ruled by project beancounters or had no practical connection with realityEmbarrassedEmbarrassedEmbarrassed Wanna place a bet on a new design minimum in the 'ol design manual appearing soon? Tunnels never behave as intended.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, December 1, 2014 6:39 PM

BALT   --  My question was why wasn't the shaft opening raised above any 500 year flood possibility.  Maybe Mario can fill us in more ?

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,279 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, December 1, 2014 6:25 PM

Was this the 2nd 500 year flood of the year?    Seems like every week we have the storm of the Century!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Tunnel flooding again.
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, December 1, 2014 5:47 PM

No not the North river tunnels.  The HSR tunnel from France to Spain on the east coast has floooded again after one flooding in September.  This due to a river flooding into shaft. Guess the operator didn't learn a lesson.  Appears water came in a ventilation shaft.  Damage unknown but possibly extensive.    Question  -- Why no flood gate or the shaft opening above the 500 year flood zone? 

 

http://www.railjournal.com/index.php/high-speed/france-spain-hsl-severed-by-flooding-again.html?channel=542

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy