Trains.com

When will they ever learn?

2114 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Big Blackfoot River
  • 2,788 posts
Posted by Geared Steam on Monday, September 8, 2014 6:38 PM

He wanted to get rid of that old Ford and get a speedy new Charger!

"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination."-Albert Einstein

http://gearedsteam.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, September 7, 2014 4:17 PM

Convicted One

ChuckCobleigh
Don't  know about Indiana, but out here in California, he would have a few "days off" after that incident.

The City police here have an interlock that will not allow computer input if the cruiser is moving more than 5 mph.

You don't have to input to a computer to be distracted by it.  Just trying to read it is more than enough.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Sunday, September 7, 2014 12:01 PM

In a way this event reminds me of the incident where an oil tanker got broadsided sitting at a grade crossing at night.

I believe that the popular opinion at that time was that the driver was definitely an idiot for driving too fast for conditions (visibility in that incident) whereas the driver in this incident was driving too fast for conditions (inattentiveness this time) as well.

In any event I think we can all agree that any motorist who hits a train is an idiot?

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Sunday, September 7, 2014 11:55 AM

ChuckCobleigh
Don't  know about Indiana, but out here in California, he would have a few "days off" after that incident.

The City police here have an interlock that will not allow computer input if the cruiser is moving more than 5 mph.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Sunday, September 7, 2014 11:54 AM

Semper Vaporo
I guess I saw an implication that it was an "intentional bypassing" the gates and not an inadvertent crashing through the gates due to inattention to the duties of driving.

I reworded it to make it less vague, thanks for the heads up! Thumbs Up

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Sunny (mostly) San Diego
  • 1,920 posts
Posted by ChuckCobleigh on Sunday, September 7, 2014 11:50 AM

tree68

They (the police) were pretty up front about it.  Wonder if they'll turn it into a teaching moment on the dangers of texting while driving, etc...

Don't  know about Indiana, but out here in California, he would have a few "days off" after that incident.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Saturday, September 6, 2014 10:48 PM

Convicted One

"a public safety officer goes around running crossing guards"

 

Notice that I did NOT say  he ran around the crossing guards, I said HE goes around running crossing guards. there is a subtle yet substantial difference between what I said and the way you seem to have taken it

 
Sorry 'bout that, I must of gotten my tongue wrapped around my eye teeth and couldn't see what I was saying.  I guess I saw an implication that it was an "intentional bypassing" the gates and not an inadvertent crashing through the gates due to inattention to the duties of driving.  Either way, it is a bad mark on his driving record and an explicit example to the rest of us to pay attention to where we are going and not be paying attention to other things.
 

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, September 6, 2014 9:54 PM

tree68

They (the police) were pretty up front about it.  Wonder if they'll turn it into a teaching moment on the dangers of texting while driving, etc...

They probably should have it on video!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Saturday, September 6, 2014 9:46 PM

They (the police) were pretty up front about it.  Wonder if they'll turn it into a teaching moment on the dangers of texting while driving, etc...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Saturday, September 6, 2014 9:44 PM

"a public safety officer goes around running crossing guards"


Notice that I did NOT say  he ran around the crossing guards, I said HE goes around running crossing guards. there is a subtle yet substantial difference between what I said and the way you seem to have taken it

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Saturday, September 6, 2014 9:40 PM

As I understand it, he didn't "run around" the gates, he ran through them because he was looking at his in-car computer screen... "Distracted Driving", akin to "Texting while driving".

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
When will they ever learn?
Posted by Convicted One on Saturday, September 6, 2014 9:29 PM

http://www.thestarpress.com/story/news/local/2014/09/05/state-trooper-crashes-into-train-near-muncie/15152899/

Sad really, when even a public safety officer goes around running  through crossing guards. Wonder if he will be cited?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy