Trains.com

MKT Rolling Stock

3292 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Saturday, September 6, 2014 8:01 AM

CShaveRR

The UP, if it doesn't sell it off, could repaint it gray and put its logo and slogan on the side, but it would still be MKT 575.  That's how they roll.

This morning, or late last night, I saw MKT 586 on the end of a sand train at Council Bluffs.  Still in green, although really faded and a tad rusty.

Pulling into Boone, I saw MKT 555 in the yard.  It has been repainted gray and has the UP logo.

Jeff

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, September 5, 2014 11:49 AM

Falcon48

Reporting marks of fallen flags can be used long after their flag has fallen.  For example, UP has a good number of fairly new cars with "CMO" marks.  These are the reporting marks of the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha RR, a component of the C&NW that went out of existence in 1973.  But the reporting marks are still good, and are considered UP marks.  My information is that UP used them on these cars in connection with the underlying financing arrangements.

When it came time to divvy up the ConRail equipment CSX & NS used the preexisting fallen flag reporting marks from within the ConRail sphere - NYC for the equipment conveyed to CSX and PRR for the equipment conveyed to NS.  During the period prior to split day equipment with those marks were accounted for in the ConRail 'bucket'; after split day they were accounted for in the CSX & NS ''buckets'.

Class 1 carriers with multiple 'fallen flag' marks within their domain may use those marks for special purposes known only to the carrier.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 1,307 posts
Posted by Falcon48 on Thursday, September 4, 2014 9:02 PM

Reporting marks of fallen flags can be used long after their flag has fallen.  For example, UP has a good number of fairly new cars with "CMO" marks.  These are the reporting marks of the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha RR, a component of the C&NW that went out of existence in 1973.  But the reporting marks are still good, and are considered UP marks.  My information is that UP used them on these cars in connection with the underlying financing arrangements.

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • From: Mankato, MN
  • 126 posts
Posted by gopherstate on Wednesday, September 3, 2014 4:00 PM

I see a fair amount of green MKT 2-bay hoppers in Mankato, MN.

They are loaded with sand at a Unimin Facility in nearby Kasota, MN

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Tuesday, September 2, 2014 9:45 PM

I used to see green ex-MKT covered hoppers on the Great Lakes Central (ex-AA track) thru Cadillac MI.  I presume they were in foundry sand service, although they also hauled cement on the line.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 152 posts
Posted by Northtowne on Tuesday, September 2, 2014 8:59 PM
Yes, Brian Schmidt, it looks just like your photo link. It is, no doubt, a cement hopper. There are (were) quite a few cement plants served by the Katy in those days. Northtowne
Moderator
  • Member since
    January 2011
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 1,532 posts
Posted by Brian Schmidt on Tuesday, September 2, 2014 3:10 PM

Did it look like this MKT car I saw in Indiana last year:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/railohio/9735883614

Brian Schmidt, Editor, Classic Trains magazine

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, September 1, 2014 8:47 AM

It is a UP car.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Sunday, August 31, 2014 11:09 PM

The UP, if it doesn't sell it off, could repaint it gray and put its logo and slogan on the side, but it would still be MKT 575.  That's how they roll.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:33 PM

Links to a photos of MKT 575 (from 2006): http://www.railcarphotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=12798 

And 577 (2012 photo): http://www.railcarphotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=67403 

Sorry, doesn't appear to be one of 576 there (yet). 

Notes underneath the photos say they were built in April 1988, and that Missouri - Kansas - Texas is now a UP "Property Mark".

- Paul North. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Sunday, August 31, 2014 6:34 PM

UP, unless the reporting marks changed.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 152 posts
MKT Rolling Stock
Posted by Northtowne on Sunday, August 31, 2014 4:49 PM
Don't know if this kind of post is allowed, but I saw MKT 2 bay covered hopper car 576 today on the NS in Birmingham, AL, unpatched still in green, though faded. Means a lot to me to see this because I grew up along side Katy tracks in Oklahoma many yrs ago. Anyone know who it belongs to now? Northtowne

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy