Trains.com

Total Confusion

2253 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Friday, February 8, 2013 12:23 PM

Thanks guys. I have printed out both of your suggestions and will give it a go the next time the situation arises.

Bruce

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,011 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, February 8, 2013 10:58 AM

AK - Like Adrianspeeder said, you can just copy and paste from whatever you want.  Some people make the quoted portions italic.

If you want to attribute the quote, you can use the quote tag, the format of which you can see if you select Quote on a reply.  All you have to do is change the name.  Tags use the square brackets, I'll use the other brackets to demonstrate: 

{quote user="whatshisname"}whatever he said{/quote}.

Note that tags come in matched pairs, with the closing tag having a slash.

One advantage of being a "command line commando..."

 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Harrisburg PA / Dover AFB DE
  • 1,482 posts
Posted by adrianspeeder on Friday, February 8, 2013 10:48 AM

AgentKid

I wish you could quote from multiple posters, but since I can't,

Quote like you normally would, copy, go back to the thread...

AgentKid

Bruce

Quote the next post you want, and just paste what you copied before at the top.

Adrianspeeder

USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Saturday, February 2, 2013 6:09 PM

I wish you could quote from multiple posters, but since I can't, I will just say that both "Z" and "Balt" are right.

On CP, sequential numbers often indicate outbound and return trips by the same crews and locomotives. Not necessarily loads and returning empties.

Way back in the day, it also included combines and cabooses on mixed trains. Going through old ETT's, it is fascinating/astounding to see the vast areas covered by one crew. It is amazing how far crews went before the RR strike of 1955, when crews used to be on the road for six days a week. After that strike, everything had to be rearranged so that no crew was away from home for more than four days and three nights at a time. The resulting cost increase was the beginning of the end for mixed train service, which ended on the prairies during the 1965-67 time frame.

Bruce

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Saturday, February 2, 2013 7:47 AM

Just because trains have consecutive numbers, or even if they are so called-counterparts doesn't mean they have to do the same work, only in reverse. 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,277 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, February 2, 2013 6:39 AM

Connections - or the lack thereof!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Friday, February 1, 2013 8:27 PM

Well, as Robert LeMassena once said, "Remember, it may not make sense to you, but it makes sense to SOMEBODY!"

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: Libertyville, IL
  • 372 posts
Total Confusion
Posted by Mr. Railman on Friday, February 1, 2013 6:53 PM

Now this puzzles me more than I thought it would.

Canadian Pacific 282, which consists of autoracks and intermodal, passes by Bensenvile without  dropping crew or cars, and makes its way to Bedford Park, where CSX owns the intermodal ramp.

281, the westbound counterpart of 282, has no intermodal, and exits Bensenville to A5, where it makes way north on the C&M

The third and final brother train, number 280, has a manifest style train, and takes the UP New Line to Bensenville.

I guess this really gives a good definition of "To Each their own"

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy