Trains.com

Tee Hee with U P!

2782 views
49 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Tee Hee with U P!
Posted by Mookie on Monday, August 16, 2004 6:38 AM
I am not bashing UP, but I read this in the Omaha paper!

Nearly split a stitch!

Union Pacific Corporation bans employees from smoking OUTSIDE it's new downtown headquarters.

So employees cross the street and light up on property belonging to Qwest and a city library.

A call was made and "UP was wonderful; they got right on it"!!!

Their solution?

The company installed ashtrays on the library side of the street and UP employees empty the ashtrays!

Just struck me funny that they couldn't figure out a room or a place for THEIR employees to smoke, either inside or outside. Did they not think this would be a problem?

Well, silly me, guess it isn't a problem for them anymore. Now it is the library's problem!

[%-)] La Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Monday, August 16, 2004 6:44 AM
Is that constitutional? If it is than the unions should fight for their right to be able to at least smoke outside. I could see if they were near chemicals or explosives but not an office building with a lot of stress. Would they rather folks come to work drunk?
Andrew
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,286 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Monday, August 16, 2004 6:50 AM
I guess thats one way to keep their property clean of "butts".
stay safe
Joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Monday, August 16, 2004 6:52 AM
In the words of the railroads " we have the right to say who can and can not smoke on this property it belongs to us not the employees or the unions. and since we cant let some smoke and others not because of discrimination, we wont allow any smoking at all. and you are lucky we give you a smoke break . now put them out and get back to work"
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: indiana
  • 792 posts
Posted by joseph2 on Monday, August 16, 2004 6:55 AM
Maybe if the workers start using chewing tobacco the UP will make a room for smokers.Joe G.
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,827 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Monday, August 16, 2004 9:26 AM
There's been rumors of a big change coming in the UP policy concerning smoking. No one has said for sure, but expecting them to ban smoking on the property. The ban at the new HQ could be the beginning of this.
Or maybe they don't want all the non-employe crowds that are flocking to the new cafeteria to have to walk past all the smokers.
Jeff
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Omaha, Nebraska
  • 1,920 posts
Posted by Willy2 on Monday, August 16, 2004 9:44 AM
I don't know for sure, but I'd think there would be a better solution than that! However, I understand that it is their right to decide what to do about problems.

Willy

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Monday, August 16, 2004 9:54 AM
I can't understand government about smoking. If they were that gun-hoe on people stopping smoking than why is it still legalized? The answer is that they collect taxes from it so they don't really want people to stop smoking. Smoking is like a drug addiction and if they really wanted them to stop they should put the smokers into rehab. If UP or any other employer wants their employees to stop smoking than they should pay for them to go on to the patch or something or press the government to fund a tabacco rehab program
Andrew
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Monday, August 16, 2004 11:35 AM
CN banned smoking in all work areas on the RR including the Diesil house, car shop etc. I don't know how the bossed can tell cigarette smoke from welding smoke or locomotive exhaust but apparently cigarette smoke is much more irritating... I'll take my chances with getting caught and fired for smoking.
Randy
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Northern Kentucky
  • 512 posts
Posted by louisnash on Monday, August 16, 2004 11:45 AM
I like what Joe K. said. Answers the problem completely.

Brian (KY)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 16, 2004 8:53 PM
so i'm guessin railroads frown on smoking in the locomotive cab....so how often are the smoke breaks? haha. i can't really see goin out back on the platform to lite up @70 mph.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Monday, August 16, 2004 9:21 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03

so i'm guessin railroads frown on smoking in the locomotive cab....so how often are the smoke breaks? haha. i can't really see goin out back on the platform to lite up @70 mph.


Good luck trying not to spick ashes on yourself at that stage. Me personally I would light up cigarette while switching an oil refinery that way if my crew times out, I won't have to call a taxi because the blast will already land me close to my home...That's my idea of flying.[:D][:D]
Andrew
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, August 17, 2004 6:14 AM
I know - I have fur between my ears, but you missed the point completely. This wasn't about smoking - the funny part was the way the UP handled the situation. Instead of either providing a well ventilated smoking room, or some kind of outside shed on the property, they installed ashtrays - ACROSS the street - right by the library, which I am pretty sure isn't their property!

They want to look into sending these people to a mall a short distance from the building to smoke, but the city fathers are frowning.

My point is, you have smokers on staff. You know this is a fact. Why would you not provide them a suitable place either within the building or outside, instead of making them someone else's problem! Do they make their employees go across the street to use the restroom?

And sending them to the mall in the middle of January in Omaha - well, there is an hour out of each day! Bundle up, put on boots, walk the block or so, have your break, reverse the whole thing - twice a day! But.....it gets them onto someone else's property, not yours! And they WILL supply the ashtrays as a convenience for the OTHER property owner!

We are going from the ridiculous to the stupid!

They are UP employees! UP - deal with it on your own property!

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,286 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Tuesday, August 17, 2004 7:22 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

I know - I have fur between my ears, but you missed the point completely. This wasn't about smoking - the funny part was the way the UP handled the situation. Instead of either providing a well ventilated smoking room, or some kind of outside shed on the property, they installed ashtrays - ACROSS the street - right by the library, which I am pretty sure isn't their property!

They want to look into sending these people to a mall a short distance from the building to smoke, but the city fathers are frowning.

My point is, you have smokers on staff. You know this is a fact. Why would you not provide them a suitable place either within the building or outside, instead of making them someone else's problem! Do they make their employees go across the street to use the restroom?

And sending them to the mall in the middle of January in Omaha - well, there is an hour out of each day! Bundle up, put on boots, walk the block or so, have your break, reverse the whole thing - twice a day! But.....it gets them onto someone else's property, not yours! And they WILL supply the ashtrays as a convenience for the OTHER property owner!

We are going from the ridiculous to the stupid!

They are UP employees! UP - deal with it on your own property!

Mookie

Mookie
I understand your point completely. We have the same problem where I work.The front door back door and some dock doors littered with butts because people dont clean up their own mess.Do the people who dont smoke get an extra ten min off because they dont go outside?probably not.[:(].If you smoke its your choice just please clean up after yourself.
stay safe
joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, August 18, 2004 6:33 AM
and the latest absurdity is that UP doesn't want any employees smoking on the public - got that - public - sidewalk in front of the building. Arrogance and absurdity are overruling the common sense again! They knew they had smokers in their employ...

[2c]

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Wednesday, August 18, 2004 7:36 AM
Good luck enforcing that UP. Thease guys don't know when to quit while they're ahead do they.
Andrew
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,865 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, August 18, 2004 8:11 AM
Policy where I work is no smoking within 50 feet of a building entrance (or inside). In most cases (at least for higher occupancy buildings), "bus" shelters have been installed well away from the building entrances for the convenience of the smokers.

The only gripe I have about the smokers (and it's really a management issue) is that rather than the usual 10-15 "coffee" minute break once in the morning and afternoon, they seem to be taking "short" breaks about once an hour. They may only smoke one cigarette, and I'm sure the "break" lasts only 5 or so, but you also have to factor in "travel time" (bathroom, stopping to chat with co-workers, etc), which means they are spending 10-15 minutes away from their desk each time...

Of course, the top guy in the building is a smoker...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, August 18, 2004 8:17 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tree68

Policy where I work is no smoking within 50 feet of a building entrance (or inside). In most cases (at least for higher occupancy buildings), "bus" shelters have been installed well away from the building entrances for the convenience of the smokers.

The only gripe I have about the smokers (and it's really a management issue) is that rather than the usual 10-15 "coffee" minute break once in the morning and afternoon, they seem to be taking "short" breaks about once an hour. They may only smoke one cigarette, and I'm sure the "break" lasts only 5 or so, but you also have to factor in "travel time" (bathroom, stopping to chat with co-workers, etc), which means they are spending 10-15 minutes away from their desk each time...

Of course, the top guy in the building is a smoker...
Driver has same complaint - he works with a lot of smokers and of course, the university has banned smoking up to 10 feet away from building. But my point exactly - they ban the smoking, so the UP people will have to bundle up in sub-zero weather, put on boots, truck a block away, have their break then come back and reverse whole situation and where others have set 15-20 min breaks, they will spend at least 30 min or more - just because UP can't see beyond their noses!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, August 18, 2004 8:18 AM
Originally posted by Junctionfan

Good luck enforcing that UP. Thease guys don't know when to quit while they're ahead do they.
Bingo!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Wednesday, August 18, 2004 11:43 AM
Getting canned for smoking isn't going to be a very big black mark on my resume'....I got better stuff !!!
Randy
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North Central Illinois
  • 1,458 posts
Posted by CBQ_Guy on Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:23 PM
NOBODY tell me I can't smoke OUTSIDE...period!!!
"Paul [Kossart] - The CB&Q Guy" [In Illinois] ~ Modeling the CB&Q and its fictional 'Illiniwek River-Subdivision-Branch Line' in the 1960's. ~
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Wednesday, August 18, 2004 1:04 PM
If they are that concerned about smoke; why don't they get rid of their Big Boy. Just kidding.
Andrew
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, August 18, 2004 1:10 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan

If they are that concerned about smoke; why don't they get rid of their Big Boy. Just kidding.
Psssttt - they did!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,786 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Thursday, August 19, 2004 5:47 PM
(1) Some of it is the "image" of visitors having to "run the gauntlet" getting in the front door of a new building (pretty disgusting)....1416 Dodge was bad about that and the sidewalk and air around the place reeked of smokers nicotine.

(2) Think that's bad, wait till the stories come out about the cubicle police/ architectural gestapo/ feng-shui Keystone Cops [:D].......The people who determine what a workspace in a cubicle ought to be ought to be drawn, quartered, shot and hung for their warped view of reality. (about to suffer the same fate as the folks in the new yellow peril Crystal Palace myself).....
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Thursday, August 19, 2004 7:49 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan

If they are that concerned about smoke; why don't they get rid of their Big Boy. Just kidding.
Psssttt - they did!


REALLY!? (bogled) I thought they kept that thing around for excursion service.
Andrew
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:18 PM
I'm wondering if a similar thing is going to happen in Fort Worth if you know what I mean [:)].
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:27 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan

QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan

If they are that concerned about smoke; why don't they get rid of their Big Boy. Just kidding.
Psssttt - they did!


REALLY!? (bogled) I thought they kept that thing around for excursion service.
Big boys havn't smoked for years. UP only has that little challenger and that almost unnoticeable 4-8-4 smoking these days.
Randy
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:58 PM
Sad thing is that the Big Boys never caused cancer, and look which one we kept around.
-Daniel
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Friday, August 20, 2004 6:25 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan

QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan

If they are that concerned about smoke; why don't they get rid of their Big Boy. Just kidding.
Psssttt - they did!


REALLY!? (bogled) I thought they kept that thing around for excursion service.
3985 is a Challenger - not a Big Boy. Kid sister to the Big Boy.

Moo

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Friday, August 20, 2004 6:29 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mudchicken

(1) Some of it is the "image" of visitors having to "run the gauntlet" getting in the front door of a new building (pretty disgusting)....1416 Dodge was bad about that and the sidewalk and air around the place reeked of smokers nicotine.

(2) Think that's bad, wait till the stories come out about the cubicle police/ architectural gestapo/ feng-shui Keystone Cops [:D].......The people who determine what a workspace in a cubicle ought to be ought to be drawn, quartered, shot and hung for their warped view of reality. (about to suffer the same fate as the folks in the new yellow peril Crystal Palace myself).....
I don't like to run the gauntlet myself - but the wide-forehead guys should have provided for the employees they already had that smoked. Maybe a roof-top room. Something either in or close by the building. Still think this is blow your toes off then go Duh planning.

Chicken house becoming more of a roaster pan, eh? Hee Hee!

Love it!

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy