Trains.com

Does this make any sense?

2844 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Does this make any sense?
Posted by Convicted One on Friday, April 15, 2011 8:39 AM

Something I've been seeing a lot of on NS's former Wabash line, is power sets made up of one NS unit on the point for eastbound runs, with two trailing UP units. When trains come back headed for the west, no big surprise but the two UP units are still pointed west, with the NS unit trailing.

Got me to wondering if this is part of some effort to balance hours in real time.  (example) if the total haul for  both railroads is 3000 miles, with 2000 of those being on UP, and the eastern one third on NS, such an arrangement would balance the hours, with no further need of adjustment. is this possible, or am I just seeing shapes in the clouds?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,901 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, April 15, 2011 10:21 AM

I'm guessing you're pretty close to the mark. 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Friday, April 15, 2011 11:03 AM

Yes, that's very possible for long-haul 'run-through' trains.  It would also explain why in some photos from out west (such as railpictures.net), I sometimes see a single NS unit 2 or 3 deep in a UP (or BNSF) consist - on the 'flip side' of the run. 

This could also occur on more local runs, simply to repay for NS power that's been used by UP.  But with this time of recent locomotive surpluses, that's kind of surprising.

Actually, it may be NS is 'renting' UP power.  I believe that all of NS' stored units have been back 'on-line' for about a year now, and the new SD70ACe's are just now arriving.  With recent increases in coal, automotive, and intermodal traffic, NS may be power-short - and if UP has a surplus, why not do the obvious ?

One thing that's surprising:  I would expect to see the NS unit leading each way, because of cab signal compatibility.  But maybe that's not an issue on your line.  Further east from here it is - all leading locos on Amtrak's routes have to be equipped with "Locomotive Speed Limiter" equipment, which means the NS units have to lead.

- Paul North. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    May 2002
  • 318 posts
Posted by JayPotter on Friday, April 15, 2011 11:49 AM

Are they coal trains?

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Friday, April 15, 2011 12:04 PM

Mostly auto rack unit trains, and covered hoppers (chemical, i think).

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Friday, April 15, 2011 9:26 PM

I'm not sure where you post from, but these could be run-through trains between Proviso or North Platte and Elkhart, or Conway.  Or it could be payback...quite often the ZEMCH and ZCHEM pair of Roadrailer trains run with pairs of NS units between Proviso and East Minneapolis.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, April 16, 2011 5:32 AM

My first guess is that this is a power set being used in run-through service....coming from a yard on the UP to a yard on the NS....so long as the power is OK on their inspection dates and mechanical condition they will tend to shuttle back and forth for several round trips.  While HP hours are always counted, they are not the reason for this engine consist.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Saturday, April 16, 2011 8:10 AM

I'm sorry, Con (Mr. One); I didn't read your original post clearly enough.  If you're on the old Wabash, the run-throughs I mentioned wouldn't be applicable.  There might still be something from St. Louis or even KC that would fit, but I don't know what Up had along those routes.  Still, equalizing for the Roadrailer or similar runs remains a good possibility.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Saturday, April 16, 2011 10:02 AM

Convicted one,

If I may ask, I'm curious about which former Wabash line you are watching, and where.

I've fanned the line from central Indiana to Detroit many times, and have seen run-through power going both ways. I've moved to Durand, MI which is CN territory, but it is not uncommon to see foreign power on the main.

Norm


  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Saturday, April 16, 2011 2:40 PM

Norm48327

Convicted one,

If I may ask, I'm curious about which former Wabash line you are watching, and where.

 

 

NS main between Logansport and Butler.

 

yeah, I've been seeing foreign power for years (on this line) but started to notice a pattern, and just got to wondering if the pattern might be intentional to balance power, ALL IN ONE RUN. rather than having to assign "payback" units and keep track of them.

 

It made just enough sense that  I had to ask.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Saturday, April 16, 2011 2:53 PM

NS routinely  runs westbound autoracks out to KC ...and hands them off to the western roads.

i just got to thinking how some of those go all the way to the west coast, in which case the scenario i outline, might be a plausible strategy.

I'm sure that run through saves both roads the time of pumping the brakes up, etc  ( compared to if  alternately they switched locos when handing off the train)...so anything to make that work as smoothly as possible makes sense.

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Saturday, April 16, 2011 6:19 PM

Another possibility is the signaling.  Do the NS rails have different signaling and rules than UP? If so you would expect the trains to be run by engineers from the home area with their loco.

Kind of like having a pilot board a foreign ship when entering a  port area.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Sunday, April 17, 2011 11:08 AM

I'm fairly confident that the engine crews are all NS in this particular location, probably out of Peru, In.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,533 posts
Posted by zugmann on Sunday, April 17, 2011 11:12 AM

Run through agreements allow for quicker delivery since you don't have the power changes and all that stuff - but there's usually standing orders (written or implied/tradition) to "turn" the foreign power* and get it back to the host railroad as quickly as possible.  There are people in the glass towers that keep track of these matters (and all appropriate billing/HP hours).  Keeping the sets together just makes the process quicker and easier.

*- same thing applies to foreign EOTDs.

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Sunday, April 17, 2011 11:40 AM

Thanks!1 (I hadn't even thought about EOTD's, but that makes sense too)

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Tuesday, April 19, 2011 12:22 PM

Convicted One

I'm fairly confident that the engine crews are all NS in this particular location, probably out of Peru, In.

AFAIK, only NS crews and NS trains run on this segment.  (CP has trackage rights North/East of Butler) All NS trains change crews in Peru.  It is the division point between the Illinois Division and Lake Division.  Eastbound, Peru crews run to Detroit, Toledo, or Elkhart. Obviously, the Detroit crews stay on the former Wabash all the way.  The Toledo crews can swing off the Wabash at either Fort Wayne or Butler, mostly, the latter.  The Elkhart bound crews switch lines at Wabash.

Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Friday, April 22, 2011 3:24 PM

rrnut282

 

.  The Toledo crews can swing off the Wabash at either Fort Wayne or Butler

 

Really? If the (some) Toledo bound trains  leave the wabash at Fort Wayne, what route do they take?

Also,... Triple crown trains made up in Ft Wayne, and heading north, do they bus crews from Peru to Fort Wayne  just for that trip?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy