Trains.com

Clean locomotives get noticed..

2060 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,790 posts
Clean locomotives get noticed..
Posted by Ulrich on Tuesday, June 14, 2022 8:50 AM

G&W clearly cares about how their locomotives look.. everytime I see one here in town it looks as if it came right off the wash line. Even my daughter who is not a railfan noticed.. 

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,578 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Tuesday, June 14, 2022 9:09 AM

Good for them for putting forth the effort.

How do you expect people to respect you as a first-class professional organization if you don't look like one?  Appearances are everything.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,790 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Tuesday, June 14, 2022 12:19 PM

Flintlock76

Good for them for putting forth the effort.

How do you expect people to respect you as a first-class professional organization if you don't look like one?  Appearances are everything.

 

 

100% true. G&W has figured it out. Their locomotives look like Athearns straight of the box. If one weathered them even a little they would look unrealistic. 

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,578 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Tuesday, June 14, 2022 7:16 PM

Ulrich
Their locomotives look like Athearns straight of the box.

I'm an O Gauger myself but I get your meaning perfectly!  Wink

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,863 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, June 14, 2022 9:15 PM

While G&W has a lot of locomotives, they are spread out amongst their various properties.  I'd opine that most of those properties have just a few locomotives, so keeping them spiffy is less of a challenge.

The five US Class 1's operate almost 25,000 locomotives, collectively, and with the exception of special purpose units (yards, etc) they travel the entire country. 

G&W has just shy of 600 in total, spread out over 100+ railroads.  If your corner of the G&W world has just five locos, keeping them looking nice is a little easier - and you know that you'll be running that same locomotive tomorrow.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,518 posts
Posted by zugmann on Tuesday, June 14, 2022 10:23 PM

Our engines used to get run through the wash rack every time they went to the bigger engine shop up the road for their 92 day MI. 

 

They haven't done that in years. Probably Something Related to an operating policy change or something. 

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Sterling Heights, Michigan
  • 1,673 posts
Posted by SD60MAC9500 on Tuesday, June 14, 2022 10:56 PM
 

zugmann

Our engines used to get run through the wash rack every time they went to the bigger engine shop up the road for their 92 day MI. 

 

They haven't done that in years. Probably Something Related to an operating policy change or something. 

 

 

Precision Schedule Reductions? These days I just find the term PSR as the most contradictory ever crafted... As none of the C1's actually have precise or scheduled railroading...Why not just call it RSR? Reduced Service Railroading? A client of mine we had a nice laugh over that term some months back when I was advising them.

 
 
 
 
Rahhhhhhhhh!!!!
  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,323 posts
Posted by rdamon on Wednesday, June 15, 2022 6:50 AM

Seeing some of UP's Heritage units on the various cameras it looks like they all got some TLC.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,827 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Wednesday, June 15, 2022 3:58 PM

zugmann

Our engines used to get run through the wash rack every time they went to the bigger engine shop up the road for their 92 day MI. 

 

They haven't done that in years. Probably Something Related to an operating policy change or something. 

 

I think environmental regulations also have changed, making it more expensive to wash engines.  You know, collecting and cleaning the dirty, oily water.  I thought I also read once that some of the chemicals used for cleaning are no longer allowed.  The ones that are allowed are more expensive than the old ones.  

Our engines get washed every time it rains.  But the dirty, oily runoff is collected by the ground.

Jeff

  • Member since
    December 2017
  • From: I've been everywhere, man
  • 4,259 posts
Posted by SD70Dude on Wednesday, June 15, 2022 4:13 PM

I wonder if Montana Rail Link continued to clean their units after the Mullan Tunnel was upgraded?

https://railpictures.net/photo/411650/

https://railpictures.net/photo/411748/

I know this is about trains, but I can't stop drooling over that truck.

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,578 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Wednesday, June 15, 2022 6:50 PM

SD70Dude
I know this is about trains, but I can't stop drooling over that truck.

Picture One, yuck!

Picture Two, oh yeah, that pick-up's a classic!

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,518 posts
Posted by zugmann on Wednesday, June 15, 2022 6:53 PM

wrong post.

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,790 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Wednesday, June 15, 2022 8:13 PM

In good shape and fully depreciated.. that would be enough to make an accoutant drool too. 

  • Member since
    April 2021
  • 61 posts
Posted by SALfan1 on Wednesday, June 15, 2022 8:23 PM

SD70Dude

I wonder if Montana Rail Link continued to clean their units after the Mullan Tunnel was upgraded?

https://railpictures.net/photo/411650/

https://railpictures.net/photo/411748/

I know this is about trains, but I can't stop drooling over that truck.

 

Truck is a '78 - '79 Ford; my father and brother each had one.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,863 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, June 15, 2022 9:31 PM

jeffhergert
I think environmental regulations also have changed, making it more expensive to wash engines.  You know, collecting and cleaning the dirty, oily water. 

The military installation near me built a facility specifically to wash vehicles, particularly those that had been in the field.  The tank portion actually has a drive-through pond.  The fiacility includes holding ponds and a host of other pollution mitigation facilities.

Putting in such a ficility at every locomotive service facility would be prohibitive, and any facility that was washing dozens of locos per day would certainly garner the attention of regulators.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,937 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, June 15, 2022 10:10 PM

tree68
 
jeffhergert
I think environmental regulations also have changed, making it more expensive to wash engines.  You know, collecting and cleaning the dirty, oily water.  

The military installation near me built a facility specifically to wash vehicles, particularly those that had been in the field.  The tank portion actually has a drive-through pond.  The fiacility includes holding ponds and a host of other pollution mitigation facilities.

Puting in such a ficility at every locomotive service facility would be prohibitive, and any facility that was washing dozens of locos per day would certainly garner the attention of regulators.

The 'major' engine service facilities on the Class 1 carriers are very limited in comparison to what existed in decades gone by.

On CSX there are three - Cumberland, Huntington, Waycross.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,260 posts
Posted by n012944 on Thursday, June 16, 2022 1:15 PM

While they may get noticed, do they generate new business?  Do they help retain current business?

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,518 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, June 16, 2022 1:21 PM

Just kind of shows the state of the companies.  Even the trash trucks near me are all sparkling clean.  

 

If you don't have pride to wash the oil running down the engine...not to mention the problems of oil accumulating on walkways and grab irons. 

And probably factors in a subconscience way for employee retention.  Kind of speaks to a larger sense of employee value. 

I hear the local managers catch hell from higher-ups if they let their company vehicles get dirty.  Ironic? 

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,323 posts
Posted by rdamon on Thursday, June 16, 2022 1:34 PM

Seems like a good fund-raiser for a high school sports team :D

The SP did just fine not washing anything, oh wait..

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Potomac Yard
  • 2,761 posts
Posted by NittanyLion on Thursday, June 16, 2022 2:08 PM

rdamon

Seeing some of UP's Heritage units on the various cameras it looks like they all got some TLC.

 

They were quietly repainted a few years ago, so they're looking a bit more fresh than they would otherwise.

  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,314 posts
Posted by BEAUSABRE on Thursday, June 16, 2022 2:26 PM

BaltACD
The military installation near me built a facility specifically to wash vehicles, particularly those that had been in the field.  The tank portion actually has a drive-through pond.  The fiacility includes holding ponds and a host of other pollution mitigation facilities.

I was a tanker and in my 25 year career (74-99) all vehicles, wheeled or tracked, were washed before being allowed into the motor pool after every time they went to the field. A clean tank's running gear is a lot easier to inspect and work on than one caked in dried mud. And, yes, the environmental friendliness of the wash racks went from "direct to the sewer" to "process through filtering systems and monitor the waste water" during my career. I don't know the cost in dollars but the later had to have been much more expensive to build and operate. On the other hand, it can be argued that such mitigation is cheaper in the long run. Not being involved except as a user, I just asssumed that Tank-Automotive Command and the Corps of Engineers had sharpened their pencils and done a thorough cost/benfit analysis - as well as obeying the law. 

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,578 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Thursday, June 16, 2022 2:28 PM

n012944

While they may get noticed, do they generate new business?  Do they help retain current business?

 

Couldn't hurt.  Say a potential shipper sees a semi rolling past that glistens, and then sees a diesel locomotive that looks like a self-propelled slum (or vice versa) it's bound to affect his thinking.  It would mine.

Retaining business?  Only quality service can do that.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy