Trains.com

CSX Selling New York - Quebec Massena Line to CN

4201 views
34 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2018
  • 284 posts
Posted by adkrr64 on Thursday, May 28, 2020 3:19 PM

It appears the deal has hit a snag. If I understand it correctly, the original agreement between CN and CSX stipulated that CN could never interchange with Finger Lakes Railway (FLGK). The STB asked for that stipulation to be removed or modified to allow it to happen at some point in the future if needed. Now, someone (I assume CSX) is balking at that STB stipulation and is going to ask them to reconsider it.

https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/DCMS_External_PROD/1590592889521/300667.pdf

 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,955 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, May 28, 2020 5:51 PM

adkrr64
It appears the deal has hit a snag. If I understand it correctly, the original agreement between CN and CSX stipulated that CN could never interchange with Finger Lakes Railway (FLGK). The STB asked for that stipulation to be removed or modified to allow it to happen at some point in the future if needed. Now, someone (I assume CSX) is balking at that STB stipulation and is going to ask them to reconsider it.

https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/DCMS_External_PROD/1590592889521/300667.pdf

How much traffic does CSX feel they have captive by excluding BLE (CN) interchange with FLGK?  It must be significant.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,873 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, May 28, 2020 6:57 PM

BaltACD
How much traffic does CSX feel they have captive by excluding BLE (CN) interchange with FLGK?  It must be significant.

I'm not sure how much traffic is involved.

I would opine it might be the principle of the thing rather than traffic numbers.  Can't have FGLK or NYSW running through CSX territory.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,955 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, May 28, 2020 7:19 PM

tree68
 
BaltACD
How much traffic does CSX feel they have captive by excluding BLE (CN) interchange with FLGK?  It must be significant. 

I'm not sure how much traffic is involved.

I would opine it might be the principle of the thing rather than traffic numbers.  Can't have FGLK or NYSW running through CSX territory.

They are running there now, I guess being captive to CSX at multiple interchange points.

Selling or leasing lines to short lines keeps the traffic on those lines captive to the existing situation before the closing date of the transaction.  Selling or leasing lines to a fellow Class 1 creates a entirely new equation.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,407 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Thursday, May 28, 2020 7:28 PM

It seems a common thing for class 1s to keep the last 100 feet of a spin-off, to keep the traffic coming off thier former line captive.

Edit: I should have read Balt's post before answering the previuos post.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy