Trains.com

How could a merger bring MORE variety for railfans?

Posted by Brian Schmidt
on Thursday, December 3, 2015

Could a UPS-owned train someday bring holiday cheer to consumers and railfans alike? Photo illustration by Drew Halverson
Although I’m still not convinced by the business case of a proposed Canadian Pacific and Norfolk Southern merger, the railfan side of me is intrigued by the inclusion of an “open access” carrot for shippers.

A major merger – or mergers – could bring regular Pan Am Railways trains to Columbus to interchange with the Ohio Central. It could morph Florida East Coast into America East Coast with service to New Jersey and Virginia. It could even bring new, non-railroad players into the railroad field.

Imagine if United Parcel and K-Line ran their own dedicated trains between the West Coast and Midwest. The next generation of supposedly “boring” diesel locomotives could carry a myriad of new paint schemes in all manner of colors: chocolate brown for UPS, bright yellow for DHL, and light blue for Warner Enterprises. And there’s more: ADM, Cargill, and Staley; FedEx and Roadway Express; and ArcelorMittal and U.S. Steel.

To be clear, nobody is (publicly) proposing that existing railroad customers start to run their own trains. Not yet, anyway. And other railroads are less than thrilled with the idea. Recently, an executive with the Association of American Railroads characterized the concept as “forced access” while speaking to a group of railroad historians.

But Hunter Harrison’s vague proposal to embrace open access as a way to rubber-stamp approval of his proposed takeover of NS could bring even more far-reaching (and colorful!) change to North America’s railroads than anyone could imagine now.

I, for one, am a little excited at that prospect.

Comments
To leave a comment you must be a member of our community.
Login to your account now, or register for an account to start participating.
No one has commented yet.