Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

3% grade problem

1730 views
19 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 30, 2006 11:51 PM

hi,

 

this might sound like an extreme measure.  in theory it might work.  use a rough grit sandpaper, maybe 180 grit; rub the paper on the track at a 90 degree angle  and see if that works. also use the paper on the wheels too. a rough track surface may inprove traction  but at the same time its going to make cleaning of the track difficult in the future.  a better idea is to reduce the grade angle. if possible.

 

just a thought.

 

michael   EssPee all the way

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Phoenix, Arizona
  • 1,989 posts
Posted by canazar on Monday, October 30, 2006 10:41 PM

I will echo some of the others with adivce, but maybe put them in order if I were you.

Make sure all your rolling stock is in good shape.   Clean trucks, metal wheels, all very free rolling cars.

Healthy power.   Add some weigth maybe, make sure they are working well together.  Sounds like you have quite the consist going.   If the engines run well, then you are good.   But if one is too slow to keep up with the other two...   the extra engine could be doing more harm than good.   As it would just be getting dragged.

Last option: Treat it like a real rail road.    Add more power, or cut down the train size.    Its what the real one would do.   Best of luck.

Best Regards, Big John

Kiva Valley Railway- Freelanced road in central Arizona.  Visit the link to see my MR forum thread on The Building of the Whitton Branch on the  Kiva Valley Railway

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 3,864 posts
Posted by Don Gibson on Monday, October 30, 2006 9:38 PM

REAL Railroads add engines to pull cars up grades. Why not you?

Most mainline grades are under 2%, Santa Fe had several 2.2%. Pictures show 5-6 passenger cars per 'F' unit on 'flat', and helpers on grades - ABBA with 21 cars + an extra ABBA set for same train up Cajon.

Add engines, reduce grades, or BOTH.

Most model electric engine;s pulling exceed the engines they imitate. I guess REALISM hasn't cought up with your EXPECTATIONS.

Don Gibson .............. ________ _______ I I__()____||__| ||||| I / I ((|__|----------| | |||||||||| I ______ I // o--O O O O-----o o OO-------OO ###########################
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Olympia, WA
  • 2,313 posts
Posted by gear-jammer on Monday, October 30, 2006 6:43 PM

Dave,

We have a 3% grade with 28" radius curves.  Our Broadway Limited F7AB has no trouble pulling 26 cars.  All the cars have metal wheelsets though.  None of our other locos seem to have a problem with 3%.   The 3% is not on the mainline, so the only reason for pulling that many cars would be to get it out of the way for construction projects.

Our logging line has a stretch that is 6%, but we might only pull 5 disconnects or sketeton cars.

Do the wheels on the cars or the track need cleaning?

Sue

 

Anything is possible if you do not know what you are talking about.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 2,742 posts
Posted by Dave Vollmer on Monday, October 30, 2006 6:24 PM
I agree that it's the 3% grade that's your problem.  I ditched my last layout primarily because it had 3% grades.  Sorry to bear the bad news...  For example, the heaviest grade on the PRR's mainline between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh was on the climb between Altoona and Cresson, including Horseshoe Curve.  It took teams of helper engines to drag trains kicking and squealing up that hill (still does!).  The grade?  1.86%.

Modeling the Rio Grande Southern First District circa 1938-1946 in HOn3.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Sundown
  • 406 posts
Posted by Train Master on Monday, October 30, 2006 6:16 PM
2% the most steep grade recommended

David Parks
I am the terror that flaps in the night!

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: greenville,south carolina
  • 297 posts
Posted by dwhitetop2 on Monday, October 30, 2006 6:14 PM
guys thanks for all the good inputs. what if I drop down to a 2% grade. would this work much better? I can do this with some hard work. what do you think?     thanks Dave
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Monday, October 30, 2006 6:10 PM

My P2K Heritage USRA 0-6-0 would barely shove 2 loaded red ore cars up my last layout's 3.6% mine spure.  Now that I only present it with 2.9%-3% grades, it will almost pull two of the considerably larger and heavier BLI H2a coal hoppers with loads!

Still, 3% is a very steep grade, one that will require adjustment in operations.  Either I use helpers, or I reduce the weight of my trains, just like the real guys do.  I have never tested my engines to see how much they can pull, but I would be surprised if my heavy die-cast Lionel Challenger could pull a typical Limited passenger train up my 3% grades.  I guess I should test it.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Sundown
  • 406 posts
Posted by Train Master on Monday, October 30, 2006 6:06 PM
dude, no matter how you cut it, the grades to steep. 3 athearn f7 superweights could do it but not the power your using

David Parks
I am the terror that flaps in the night!

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Newman,IL (just try finding that)
  • 262 posts
Posted by CrazyDelmar on Monday, October 30, 2006 6:01 PM

Ive got a straight 4% grade on mine, due to a needed shelf hieght change.

I use my 2 modified Atlas GP40s to pull up to 20 cars up this grade.

CRAZY DELMAR Coming back.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Georgia
  • 486 posts
Posted by soumodeler on Monday, October 30, 2006 5:38 PM
I had a grade on a previous layout that was about 5% on less than a 18" radius curve. That was a major problem. Needless to say, I took great pleasure in destroying that layout. (It also had numerous other problems with the track and turnouts)

soumodeler --------------- The Southern Serves the South!
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Jones County, Georgia
  • 1,293 posts
Posted by GearDrivenSteam on Monday, October 30, 2006 5:33 PM
3% sounds mighty strong.
It is enough that Jesus died and that he died for me.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 30, 2006 5:33 PM
3%, holy cinders, that sounds very steep to me. In an earlier layout, I had 2% and my p2k Berkshire (or most steamers for that matter, except the Broadway Limited M1a and Niagara) would not pull more than 19 cars, if I remember correctly. Maybe track wasnt as clean as it should have been, but I learnt my lesson. Next layout will have helixes of around 40 inch radius, keeping the incline at less than 1%. I want to run LONG trains...
Optimise performance by cleaning wheels and track, but a long-term solution would be to re-design your lay-out... good luck!
rik
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Boston
  • 2,226 posts
Posted by Budliner on Monday, October 30, 2006 5:32 PM

16 sounds like alot

I need 2 proto 2000's to get 12 free rolling cars up my midland grade

 

 

K: 

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: CN Flint Sub(Eastern Michigan)
  • 507 posts
Posted by NS2591 on Monday, October 30, 2006 5:27 PM
3% grade is very steep. Our club layout has a 3.6% grade(after factoring in the curves)Helix, It takes a trio of Atlas Dash 8s to pull my factory weighted unit grain train. It mostly depends on the engines, my Proto SD45s and SD60s can pull 85% of the train. up that hill. with the Bachman F7 with the Atlas F9 really doesn't help that much.
Jay Norfolk Southern Forever!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 30, 2006 5:24 PM
i would check to see if the engined are up to the NMRA standard weights. some other things that might cause more resistance:
is the grade on a curve?
do you have plastic or metal wheelsets?
how clean is the track?
how clean are the wheels on your locos and cars? 
this could all be as your locos simply not having the power to climb the hill, being older units.
3% is pretty steep, but nothing a prototype train of almost 20 cars moving at a good speed couldnt climb.
mabeyi can help more, mabey i cant. check the things on the list and i might be able to help more.
GEAREHAD426

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: greenville,south carolina
  • 297 posts
Posted by dwhitetop2 on Monday, October 30, 2006 5:20 PM
one is a bachmann f7 one is an atlas f9 the other is a proto sd9.      Dave
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 30, 2006 5:19 PM

It is very dependant on the locomotives, obviously some pull better than others. Other major factors are the weight of the cars and how well they roll. Adding weight to your locos can help improve traction, but adding too much can cause excessive stress on the motor, and with athearn RTR or Genesis diesels snapping driveshafts also becomes an issue. I run long trains, but I have free rolling cars and powerful locomotives when I do so.

My advice is to buy a truck tuner, it will make your cars roll much better. Also switch cars over to metal wheelsets cost permitting, they roll easier and dont leave gunk on the track so you will have to clean track less often. The simplest solution of course is just to use more locomotivesSmile [:)]

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 3,590 posts
Posted by csmith9474 on Monday, October 30, 2006 5:14 PM
What manufacturer and type of locomotive is it?
Smitty
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: greenville,south carolina
  • 297 posts
3% grade problem
Posted by dwhitetop2 on Monday, October 30, 2006 5:09 PM
good evening all. im having a problem with a couple of  my engines wanting to pull a string of cars up a 3% grade. the will start slipping toward the top. I only have 16 cars behind the locos. I read all the time where you guys have 40 or more cars hooked up. Should this be a problem or is this normal for a grade. The problem engines are older ones btw.    thanks Dave

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!