Jon,
Calumet is a great choice for a freelance effort when choosing Chicago. As a native Chicagoan, I freelance my layout with a Chicago theme too. It is easy to model a whole bunch of road names because so many railroads came into Chicago. In fact, as you probably know, Calumet is not the only location where multiple railroads converged and intersected.
Given the quality of your layout, no one should dare challenge the look and feel of your layout. Interestingly, the photos you posted remind me a lot of Grand Crossing, a little further north of Calumet.
If you ever decide to add to your Sweet Home Chicago layout, you might consider a background building such as the one that Walthers offers which features a four story apartment buildings. These structures still litter Chicago, and the railroads still run tracks behind these buildings. Classic Chicago. Here is a link to that structure.
http://www.walthers.com/exec/productinfo/933-3177
Once again, Jon, my compliments to you and you layout. I always enjoy photos of your work.
Rich
Alton Junction
Thanks Rich
I used Steam Powered Video's Railroad Atlas (Great Lakes West) to find the area in Chicago that had the largest concentration of converging lines and intersections from different railroads. I counted the potential for 28 different railroads within a mile radius of Calumet.
My layout is totally freelance, based on a BRC-run branch/link line, over which any of the other RR companies can travel. Not prototypical, but it means that I can run trains from any RR company that passed near Calumet (Sweethome)
The buildings were freelanced from kits to give a generic feel of 1930s-50s Chicago, with ideas and inspiration culled from old movies (Untouchables, etc.), photos and even cartoons (Dick Tracey) resulting in a layout with the feel of a warehouse district, somewhere in Chicago, without being anywhere in particular. Calumet itself probably looked nothing like anything I've modelled - I've never checked
Jon
Sweethome Chicago is now on Facebook
Sweethome Alabama is now on Facebook
Hudson Road is now on Facebook
my videos
my Railimages
Glad you showed up here on this thread.
Always enjoy seeing you layout.
What part of Chicago are you modeling? Or is it more of a freelance effort?
The whole of Sweethome Chicago would easily fit into an area of 48 square feet (1ft6in x 24ft scenic)
richhotrain CP guy in TX: Yup, LOL! Ex in Chicago LOL Say what Your ex is back here in Chicago? Rich
CP guy in TX: Yup, LOL! Ex in Chicago
Yup, LOL! Ex in Chicago
LOL
Say what
Your ex is back here in Chicago?
Did a search for EX in chicago and all i got was ex police officers working for the gangs.
CP guy in TX Yup, LOL! Ex in Chicago
Beach Bill If we're speaking about HO, I recall a magazine article awhile back about the freight line that ran along the north side of the Chicago River to take carloads of paper to the Chicago Tribune building and other places. A decent switching layout could likely be developed out of that line (seems it was C&NW) with lots of opportunity for gritty urban detailing. Bill
If we're speaking about HO, I recall a magazine article awhile back about the freight line that ran along the north side of the Chicago River to take carloads of paper to the Chicago Tribune building and other places. A decent switching layout could likely be developed out of that line (seems it was C&NW) with lots of opportunity for gritty urban detailing.
Bill
Sounds like the Kingsbury Branch. The April '75 issue of MR had an article about the Kingsbury with suggested trackplans in HO and N, IIRC.
This site is devoted to switching in Chicago...
http://chicagoswitching.com/v6/articles/default.asp
Steve S
Van Hobbies H1b, K1a, T1c, D10g, F1a, F2a, G5a. Division Point: H24-66 Hammerhead, Alco covered wagons A-B-B-A, C-Liner A-B-B-A, EMD FP7A A-B-B.
H1b modified to replicate modern day 2816. All with Tsunamis.
CP guy in TX That's easy. Anything LEAVING Chicago is my favorite part. The only thing about that town is the road out :)
That's easy.
Anything LEAVING Chicago is my favorite part. The only thing about that town is the road out :)
Wow, in that case, stay in Texas!
Rich from Chicago
CHAController Hello- You can view a few photos of my layout of Chicago via this post. The footprint is pretty close to 6x8ft. The length is a little more than 8ft but not by much, I think it scales out to 9ft. In N scale, you can pack a lot of stuff in a small space. Good luck. http://cs.trains.com/TRCCS/forums/t/195416.aspx
Hello-
You can view a few photos of my layout of Chicago via this post. The footprint is pretty close to 6x8ft. The length is a little more than 8ft but not by much, I think it scales out to 9ft. In N scale, you can pack a lot of stuff in a small space. Good luck.
http://cs.trains.com/TRCCS/forums/t/195416.aspx
Here is the direct link.
CHA, I have said it before, and I will say it again. Those are great photos of the Blue Island interlocks and bridges. Does your layout have all five of the bridges at Blue Island?
tomikawaTT You could loop the CTA El around the stadium - and just about fill a 6X10 space. And since when are rapid transit tracks NOT railroad tracks. Who says roundy-round running is unprototypical?
You could loop the CTA El around the stadium - and just about fill a 6X10 space. And since when are rapid transit tracks NOT railroad tracks.
Who says roundy-round running is unprototypical?
Yikes, I think we are getting a bit technical here. Ummm, I guess you could call rapid transit tracks "railroad tracks", but you know what I mean, Chuck. The OP would like to model Metra passenger trains as well, and there are no Metra tracks in the immediate vicinity. How's that?
Who says roundy-round running is unprototypical? Gee, I don't know that anyone said that. Who said that? LOL
richhotrain tomikawaTT: Now, ask me about Tokyo... Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964) Wrigley Field is certainly an interesting landmark and the CTA elevated trains are nearby, visible from the stands in fact. But, there are no railroad tracks nearby. So, on a layout of the size contemplated here, Wrigley Field wouldn't work. Now, tell us about Tokyo. Rich
tomikawaTT: Now, ask me about Tokyo... Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)
Now, ask me about Tokyo...
Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)
Wrigley Field is certainly an interesting landmark and the CTA elevated trains are nearby, visible from the stands in fact. But, there are no railroad tracks nearby.
So, on a layout of the size contemplated here, Wrigley Field wouldn't work.
Now, tell us about Tokyo.
Chicago has its loop. Granted that it's elevated rapid transit and doesn't carry freight. Tokyo also has a loop - much longer, (mostly) ground level and shared (in various places) with long-distance passenger and freight. The rapid transit cars are heavy rail, and the total traffic density is incredible.
Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - but not Tokyo!)
tomikawaTT From someone who, admittedly, knows nothing about Chicago: Wrigley Field? Now, ask me about Tokyo... Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)
From someone who, admittedly, knows nothing about Chicago:
Wrigley Field?
BC,
Maybe it is a predecessor to the Fermi Lab particle accelerator, the so-called "race track".
Who knew that the U.S. was that far ahead in the field of high energy physics?
Thanks to you and your pioneering efforts, BC, we now know, and we owe you a debt of gratitude.
richhotrain blownout cylinder: Now, if someone wants to model something a bit odd..how about this little wonder? A prototype figure 8 track near Chicago in Cook County, Ill. http://cs.trains.com/TRCCS/forums/t/192312.aspx?PageIndex=1 LOL We need to solve that mystery for you, BC, so we can put your mind to rest. Rich
blownout cylinder: Now, if someone wants to model something a bit odd..how about this little wonder? A prototype figure 8 track near Chicago in Cook County, Ill. http://cs.trains.com/TRCCS/forums/t/192312.aspx?PageIndex=1
Now, if someone wants to model something a bit odd..how about this little wonder?
A prototype figure 8 track near Chicago in Cook County, Ill.
http://cs.trains.com/TRCCS/forums/t/192312.aspx?PageIndex=1
We need to solve that mystery for you, BC, so we can put your mind to rest.
Any argument carried far enough will end up in Semantics--Hartz's law of rhetoric Emerald. Leemer and Southern The route of the Sceptre Express Barry
I just started my blog site...more stuff to come...
http://modeltrainswithmusic.blogspot.ca/
blownout cylinder Now, if someone wants to model something a bit odd..how about this little wonder? A prototype figure 8 track near Chicago in Cook County, Ill. http://cs.trains.com/TRCCS/forums/t/192312.aspx?PageIndex=1
You could put models of the Blues Brothers in front of some palm trees, and people would still say, "Chicago."
Seriously, I would go with the El concept, too. Of course, in the interest of full disclosure, I do subways so there's some bias to my suggestion. However, this kind of tight, urban modeling gives you the opportunity to build very "dense" scenery, so you won't run out of space very quickly. Later, when you get more space, this can be the core of a larger layout.
Subways and El trains are naturally bi-directional, so they lend themselves to smaller spaces where the issues of turning trains can be a problem. They are also better suited to tight-radius curves, another plus on smaller layouts.
It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse.
Hi again,
In my earlier post the "Chicago" I was referring to was the town of the '50s and '60s. Sounds like you are looking at modern times. In that case - the RR infrastructure of the City is a whole different ball game.
ENJOY !
Mobilman44
Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central
justinjhnsn3 I accually had Ogilvie Transportation center planned out before i lost the space. I might have thought to big when i planned it thou. I got it almost perfect. that was going to be the main attraction on the layout. That side of the river had the longest side of the basement 24ft long. In Ho to do it justice you need it 3 ft wide. At three feet wide you get 3-5 tracks of the transportation center and everything to the river compressed. To get the tracks looking (uper and lower) right for the transportation area i use about 3/4 of the of the 24ft. I could of been to much of a perfectionist in my planing thou.
I accually had Ogilvie Transportation center planned out before i lost the space. I might have thought to big when i planned it thou. I got it almost perfect. that was going to be the main attraction on the layout. That side of the river had the longest side of the basement 24ft long. In Ho to do it justice you need it 3 ft wide. At three feet wide you get 3-5 tracks of the transportation center and everything to the river compressed. To get the tracks looking (uper and lower) right for the transportation area i use about 3/4 of the of the 24ft. I could of been to much of a perfectionist in my planing thou.
Don't let the size limitations of your layout room discourage you. You say "to do it justice", and I understand what you mean, but selective compression can still work wonders.
If modeling a portion of Chicago is what you want, then do it. Even if you can only fit one or two landmark structures in your space, you can work magic with backdrops.
Go for it.
justinjhnsn3 I have explored that thought. To get the feal of a city like chicago you need atleast 3 feet wide shelves. That was based on everything in HO. Thats what i was plaining but i can not do 3 foot shelves any more.
I have explored that thought. To get the feal of a city like chicago you need atleast 3 feet wide shelves. That was based on everything in HO. Thats what i was plaining but i can not do 3 foot shelves any more.
Like Jon Grants excellent "Sweethome Chicago" layout, which is 18" deep?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seloMSKlCOU
http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/showgallery.php/cat/1580
But be that as it may - I wish you luck with your "plains".
Grin, Stein
To get the feel of Chicago, you need the details that distinguish Chicago from other cities. Some examples include
Green and white street lights; street lights are never attached to utility poles. Traffic lights are green as well.
CTA bus stop signs; either green and white or blue and white.
Light blue city trucks and the correct buses (red/cream, green/white, or white with red/blue stripes, depending on your era).
Bars with beer signs. Usually this would be the logo plus the name; i.e. "Old Style" and the name of the bar.
Local retail stores, like Walgreens and Jewel (or Jewel-Osco after 1965).
Railroads on embankments with plate girder overpasses or concrete overpasses. Low plate girder overpasses were built first, followed by concrete overpasses (usually farther out). Current overpasses are through plate girder bridges.
Billboards for local companies. A billboard like "Get the Polk Bros. Price" establishes your era. Also billboards for political candidates. Local media outlets are hyper competitive; you could have a billboard likk "Chicago Tribune - STILL The World's Greatest Newspaper".
Have a little fun. Billboards like "Slats Grobnik for County Commissioner" or "Chicago Teachers Union congratulates the World Champion Chicago Cubs" show a sense of humor.
justinjhnsn3 I have been collecting stuff for my city for a while. I had ideas on how to modify buildings to resemble different places in chicago. My problem i lost the space i was going to build it in. If i am forced to go down to a 6'x8' layout to start out at what should i model. I got way to many ideas to fit in a 6x8 so i need help. What do you think is nessary to make shure you have the feel of chicago. thanks for any help justin
I have been collecting stuff for my city for a while. I had ideas on how to modify buildings to resemble different places in chicago. My problem i lost the space i was going to build it in. If i am forced to go down to a 6'x8' layout to start out at what should i model. I got way to many ideas to fit in a 6x8 so i need help.
What do you think is nessary to make shure you have the feel of chicago.
thanks for any help
justin
you can do it on 2x4 modules, which is what I am doing. But I am taking artistic modeling liberties to fit everything in. One time I drew up about a 4x6 layout just on the CTA.
Theres plenty of action to try to model around chicago, I decided to focus on the South Water area where they have a freight terminal. Important train point origination, instead of your often used hidden staging track to create trains this is a good on-layout train creation spot.
Decide where what you would like to model and tinker a few plans out.
richhotrain justinjhnsn3: Sorry if i forgot some things. the orignal idea was going to be in HO. The space i had planed for it was a level in a 12 x 24 room and with n scale on top. All the stuff i have been colecting had been in HO. I had started custom designing some of the chicago bridges and el system with good sucess. Ever since Kato came out with their Metra train i have been looking into seeing if i can convert the Ho buildings to n scale for more room The jury is still out. The idea for the 6X8 was what is the max layout size i could start out with if the next place i live is an appartment. Most rooms are 10x10 so my max would have to be a 6x8 with the ability to get to 3 out of the 4 sides. I am doing modern era in chicago wich is mostly passenger trains. so the best you could do with a 6x8 in ho would be a metra train or subway running below ground and the el above ground. I just have way to many ideas for my own good. In the past couple of days i figured out how to convert 2 Walthers pier terminal Kits into my version of navy peir. I got all these ideas on how to build downtown but no space to build them. So my question is what part should i focus on to make an impessive chicago in a limited space. I know if i ever got the space i would expand this layout to make a better chicago. Justin, To accomodate all of your interests, you could model the Ogilvie Transportation Center in downtown Chicago where the Metra commuter trains use the former C&NW tracks and facilities. It is right at the corner of Lake and Canal streets, and the elevated mass transit line runs east and west on Lake Street, so that could be part of your layout. The Chicago River is just to the east of the Ogilvie Transportation Center for added interest. Just north of Lake Street is Kinzie Street and the bridges that span the Chicago River. With just a little selective compression, Navy Pier is just a few blocks east of the Ogilvie Transportation Center. You could do justice to all of these points of interest on a 6' x8' layout. Just some thoughts to stir your imagination. Rich
justinjhnsn3: Sorry if i forgot some things. the orignal idea was going to be in HO. The space i had planed for it was a level in a 12 x 24 room and with n scale on top. All the stuff i have been colecting had been in HO. I had started custom designing some of the chicago bridges and el system with good sucess. Ever since Kato came out with their Metra train i have been looking into seeing if i can convert the Ho buildings to n scale for more room The jury is still out. The idea for the 6X8 was what is the max layout size i could start out with if the next place i live is an appartment. Most rooms are 10x10 so my max would have to be a 6x8 with the ability to get to 3 out of the 4 sides. I am doing modern era in chicago wich is mostly passenger trains. so the best you could do with a 6x8 in ho would be a metra train or subway running below ground and the el above ground. I just have way to many ideas for my own good. In the past couple of days i figured out how to convert 2 Walthers pier terminal Kits into my version of navy peir. I got all these ideas on how to build downtown but no space to build them. So my question is what part should i focus on to make an impessive chicago in a limited space. I know if i ever got the space i would expand this layout to make a better chicago.
Sorry if i forgot some things. the orignal idea was going to be in HO. The space i had planed for it was a level in a 12 x 24 room and with n scale on top. All the stuff i have been colecting had been in HO. I had started custom designing some of the chicago bridges and el system with good sucess.
Ever since Kato came out with their Metra train i have been looking into seeing if i can convert the Ho buildings to n scale for more room The jury is still out.
The idea for the 6X8 was what is the max layout size i could start out with if the next place i live is an appartment. Most rooms are 10x10 so my max would have to be a 6x8 with the ability to get to 3 out of the 4 sides.
I am doing modern era in chicago wich is mostly passenger trains. so the best you could do with a 6x8 in ho would be a metra train or subway running below ground and the el above ground.
I just have way to many ideas for my own good. In the past couple of days i figured out how to convert 2 Walthers pier terminal Kits into my version of navy peir. I got all these ideas on how to build downtown but no space to build them.
So my question is what part should i focus on to make an impessive chicago in a limited space. I know if i ever got the space i would expand this layout to make a better chicago.
Justin,
To accomodate all of your interests, you could model the Ogilvie Transportation Center in downtown Chicago where the Metra commuter trains use the former C&NW tracks and facilities. It is right at the corner of Lake and Canal streets, and the elevated mass transit line runs east and west on Lake Street, so that could be part of your layout. The Chicago River is just to the east of the Ogilvie Transportation Center for added interest. Just north of Lake Street is Kinzie Street and the bridges that span the Chicago River. With just a little selective compression, Navy Pier is just a few blocks east of the Ogilvie Transportation Center. You could do justice to all of these points of interest on a 6' x8' layout.
Just some thoughts to stir your imagination.
steinjr justinjhnsn3: The idea for the 6X8 was what is the max layout size i could start out with if the next place i live is an appartment. Most rooms are 10x10 so my max would have to be a 6x8 with the ability to get to 3 out of the 4 sides. Or - you could choose to not make a layout on a big walk-around table, but instead put it on shelves or narrow benchwork put up against the walls. Allows wider radius curves, modeling just one side of the buildings, better visual separation between scenes, co-existence between layout and other uses of the room, and quite a few other things. Either point to point, or some kind of continuous run capability (pendulum running, swing gate/lift-out, turnback blobs or whatever. Grin, Stein
justinjhnsn3: The idea for the 6X8 was what is the max layout size i could start out with if the next place i live is an appartment. Most rooms are 10x10 so my max would have to be a 6x8 with the ability to get to 3 out of the 4 sides.
Or - you could choose to not make a layout on a big walk-around table, but instead put it on shelves or narrow benchwork put up against the walls.
Allows wider radius curves, modeling just one side of the buildings, better visual separation between scenes, co-existence between layout and other uses of the room, and quite a few other things. Either point to point, or some kind of continuous run capability (pendulum running, swing gate/lift-out, turnback blobs or whatever.
Here is a link to the old railroad bascule bridge on Kinzie:
http://www.historicbridges.org/bridges/browser/?bridgebrowser=truss/nbrail/