Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

TTE's update of and ramifications on IM Cab Forwards

580 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • 565 posts
Posted by Bapou on Sunday, August 26, 2007 9:04 AM
I agree completely, very much more since I know Tony in person and run trains almost every friday at a friends house and he is almost always there. I can tell you that he (almost) always takes the express trainLaugh [(-D].
Go NJT, NJ Transit, New Jersey Transit. Whatever you call it its good. See my pictures and videos here: http://s239.photobucket.com/albums/ff20/Bapouthetrainman/
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 26, 2007 2:49 AM

I cannot sit and be quiet with these things.

If they can make a profit on 50 units great. A few dollars is wonderful and puts food on everyone's table.

But wait... let's really make money and create a 200 unit run.

Gah!

Oh, the Manufactor does not need to answer to thier customer's asking about the schedules of this year's announced engines. They are too busy re-issuing last year's products with new packaging in a attempt to pay the bills.

Or maybe they ordered too few engines and got buried in orders. Well.. they should get right to work building the copies to satisfy the backorders ASAP.

Enough is enough.

Let's rate these Manufactors and weed out the slackers.

We are not going to get the engines we want, but we can buy other engines availible today that will do the same task.

I think the reason they only want to build a few at a time is to raise the price very high, sell ALL of the engines made and not have to pay for one more day of transit or storage related expense anymore than they have to.

One question that Tony forgot to address.... if only so few are produced, how in hell are they  replacing engines without any difficulty to anyone who returns a defective unit that appears unsalvageable.

Is there some kind of secret underground sweat shop combining these dead models and building new engines asap for the purpose of satisfying repair calls?

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,239 posts
Posted by tstage on Saturday, August 25, 2007 8:41 PM

Crandell,

I was poking around on the web a bit.  That 2-10-4 Selkirk would be quite a unique steamer on anyone's layout.

Is that a smiley face on the front of it? Smile [:)] 

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,239 posts
Posted by tstage on Saturday, August 25, 2007 8:28 PM
 selector wrote:

Tom, it must be hard to have a strong desire for a particular, and rare, locomotive that seems to be offered at a doable price, and then fades away into the mist.

Crandell,

Yea, it is...but my ultimate happiness is not based on whether I have a particular locomotive in my roster or collection.  Would it be nice and unique to have?  Absolutely.  Is it necessary?  Nah. Smile [:)]

Tom 

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Saturday, August 25, 2007 8:17 PM

Tom, it must be hard to have a strong desire for a particular, and rare, locomotive that seems to be offered at a doable price, and then fades away into the mist.  I guess if that happened over a few days it would be easy to get over, but when the hook is set and the line played out for months, only to find that the needed selling limit is up for times over what was initially stated...!

I have been fortunate to be able to fix my gaze and longing over current offerings....so far.  Heaven help me if I decide that I have to have a  CPR Selkirk.

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,239 posts
TTE's update of and ramifications on IM Cab Forwards
Posted by tstage on Saturday, August 25, 2007 3:27 PM

I just finished reading an interesting announcement on Tony's Train Exchange web site about the latest news on the Intermountain Cab Forward.  Even though I don't have a reservation for one, I do feel for Tony, as these sorts of happenings put them in an ackward spot with their customers, as well.

I would have to agree with Tony's idea that a Manufacturer's Rating System - even though it probably wouldn't be very popular with the manufacturers themselves - would help to keep the manufacturer honest and the consumer up-to-date and informed about reservations on expected upcoming releases.  I'd rather hear a company periodically (e.g. once a quarter) tell me, "Here's where things are at" with such-and-such a locomotive than not say anything at all.  For me, even if the "process" is long, it's nice to know where things are at with your order so that you have some sort of anticipatory release date.

I've had a particular "special edition" prototype locomotive on reserve from an internet vendor for over 2 years now.  The manufacturer, who would be overseing the small run (only 50 units), would start production of the locomotive when a certain quota was met.  Even though the quota was exceeded and the vendor had worked hand-in-hand with the manufacturer to see the project through, the manufacturer eventually decided to back out on the deal.

Two weeks later, the manufacturer changed their minds and said that they would honor the deal after all.  BUT...the run would have to be increased to 200 units and the manufacturer would make it available on their web site, as well.

Well, that was 9 months ago.  And I have seen nothing on the manufacturer's web site to inform the consumer that they plan on making these special edition locomotives available.  I really look forward to adding this particular locomotive to my roster.  However, I don't expect to see it - if at all - till 2009.

For me, it would be very nice to be kept abreast of what is going on.  From what I've been able to surmise, the vendor is as much in the dark on where things are at with the manufacturer as those who are holding the reservations.

This post is not meant as a complaint or an R & R (rant & rave) opportunity of my current circumstances.  This is just to make a point about the desire of being kept informed in certain situations.  I'd rather hear a manufacturer say, "Well, things are on hold at present because..." than leave things open ended.

Okay, I'm done... 

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!