Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

DCC Programming track - redundant?

2358 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: QLD, Australia
  • 1,111 posts
DCC Programming track - redundant?
Posted by tbdanny on Monday, January 4, 2010 9:29 PM

Hi all,

Having recently purchased a Digitrax PR3 and downloaded all of my loco configs onto my computer, I now find that I'm doing all my programming either at the desk or on the main.  The programming track I had set up previously behind the backdrop on my layout is no longer in use, at least at the moment.  I know I shouldn't rip it up if it's not causing any problems, but what are the advantages to keeping it in place?

Thanks in advance,

tbdanny

The Location: Forests of the Pacific Northwest, Oregon
The Year: 1948
The Scale: On30
The Blog: http://bvlcorr.tumblr.com

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Monday, January 4, 2010 9:34 PM

tbdanny
but what are the advantages to keeping it in place?

I've never had a programming track, but why not keep it for some simple job when you don't want to boot the computer?

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: QLD, Australia
  • 1,111 posts
Posted by tbdanny on Monday, January 4, 2010 10:48 PM

Thanks.  I've come up with another use for it (a bit down the page).

Cheers all,

tbdanny

The Location: Forests of the Pacific Northwest, Oregon
The Year: 1948
The Scale: On30
The Blog: http://bvlcorr.tumblr.com

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 6:17 AM

(With apologies to Jeff Foxworthy...) 

Well, if you like the option of accidentally reprogramming all of your engines at once, then you don't need a programming track.

If you like picking up your highly-detailed engines and re-railing them constantly, then you don't need a programming track.

If your computer is located next to your layout, then you don't need a programming track.

If you always install your decoders perfectly the first time, and never make wiring errors, then you don't need a programming track.

If you want to spend the cost of a new engine on extra DCC components, then you don't need a programming track.

I've got a PR2, but frankly, it's more convenient to run an engine on to the programming track on my layout.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: PtTownsendWA
  • 1,445 posts
Posted by johncolley on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 11:08 AM

Danny, a possible use if it is attached to other track with a turnout would be to isolate it with a DPDT-CO switch wired for either track power or programming . add a building or something so you can use it as an industry or just a place to spot a car or two, maybe as a team track? That way it is still available for programming if the need arises, and you have added an operation spot. John 

jc5729
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: QLD, Australia
  • 1,111 posts
Posted by tbdanny on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 5:16 PM

Mister Beasley,

The programming track is not connected to the track at all - I would have to pick up the loco to program it anyway.  The PR3's 'identify decoder' feature tells me if the install's good or not.  Also, being in IT, I have a natural preference for doing things via a computer.  And when I said programming on the main, I should have been a bit clearer - I meant in 'ops mode'

John,

Thanks for the advice.  I would do this if it were possible, however the programming track is not physically connected to the running trackage at all, and due to its position next to a staging turnout, it would be impossible to do so.

Thanks to everyone who replied.

tbdanny.

The Location: Forests of the Pacific Northwest, Oregon
The Year: 1948
The Scale: On30
The Blog: http://bvlcorr.tumblr.com

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 7:39 PM

 It is an advantage after you do a DCC install, especially if you hard wire the install. The program track option protects the decoder in case of a mis-wire. It is done that for me. A single strand of wire was poking out of a shrink tube connection. You are working with very small wire.

Some others who had a mis-wire or uninsulated wire hanging down to touch one rail or they did not completely isolate the motor. Some people can't wait to try out the loco.

Don't forget, those who say a DCC install is easy, have experience installing decoders.

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: QLD, Australia
  • 1,111 posts
Posted by tbdanny on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 8:54 PM

Rich,

I can understand that, and I've used it to test DCC installs in the past.  What I meant is that the PR3 programming track can be used for exactly the same role.  I have used it in this capacity for my last 2 out of 14 installations.  Given that the PR3 is usually at my workbench, this is often more convenient for me.

Cheers,

tbdanny

The Location: Forests of the Pacific Northwest, Oregon
The Year: 1948
The Scale: On30
The Blog: http://bvlcorr.tumblr.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!