Hey,
I'm trying to decide on the Digtrax Zephyr or the nce power cab. New to hobby and only 15, not alot of $$$$$. What is better and easier to set up.Thanks for the HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bear Down!
to the forums!
I have an NCE Power Cab. It is easy to use and the buttons are large enough to easily operate. It also has a backlit screen. If your son is also interested, you also need to purchase another cab and those cost about $60-70.
Hope this helps and again welcome.
Will
Taylor,
First off, either system will work very well for you. They both have their pluses and minuses.
If it's possible, the best thing would be for you to actually experience each system hands on. Is there an LHS (Local Hobby Shop) in your area that carries either one of this units
Another idea is to see if there is a local MRR club near you that runs DCC on their layout. Contact either the president or one of the officers, tell them that you are interested in buying a DCC system and would like to hear their experiences with the system they use. Ideally, what you would like to be able to do is to actually hold and operate a locomotive with one of the throttles to see how it feels to you.
Taylor, do you have an DCC-equipped locomotives yet?
Tom
https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling
Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.
Hey Tom,
Thanks for all the help,
I'm not good with electical, i don't know if that helps and there is a hobby shop about 30 miles away and they use a mrc system. There are some clubs and i might try that out.
No i dont have any dcc locos yet buy i'm hoping to get a mth sd70ace bnsf diesel soon that has one installed and supposely works with all system but i'm not completely sure yet.
Thanks
As stated before, you'll be happy with either one of those choices. And both the Zephyr and Power Cab will be very straightforward to set up. I know that the Power Cab comes with everything you need to get up and running. I would think that the Zephyr does, too.
Taylor, I have the NCE Power Cab and like it very much. You can read an initial review I wrote about the Power Cab at my website link. It used to be posted on the forum and had more pictures. (I've really got to get around to updating that.)
MRC makes a decent DCC system and the throttle is closer to the Power Cab but smaller. A number of the fellas here on the forum like it. MRC has three entry levels: PE (Prodigy Express), PA (Prodigy Advance), and PA2 (Prodigy Express 2). The PE will be less expensive than the Zephyr and Power Cab but will be more limited as far as expansion goes. Definitely check into the MRR clubs in your area to see if they can help you.
Taylor, since you don't have a DCC locomotive yet, don't feel rushed to go out an buy a DCC system. Do your homework and make the best informed choice for a system that fits YOUR needs.
The MTH SD70ACe will be a good locomotive for you. However, do keep in mind that the MTH locomotives with sound use their own proprietary system (DCS) to run their locomotives. You will still be able to operate them with a DCC system like the Zephyr and Power Cab BUT certain functions and features will only be accessible with MTH's DCS throttle. I would still opt for a DCC system over a DCS system.
Anyhow, Taylor, hope that helps. Please feel free to fire off more questions you might have.
I would highly suggest that you get a DCC system with a computer interface. Right now this would limit your choice to EasyDCC, Digitrax or NEC. You will also need an interface device such as a LocoBuffer or PR3 (Digitrax). The PR3 lets you downolad locomotive sounds from the Internet and upload them to a Digitrax sound decoder. You can then download DecoderPro (software) free from JMRI and use it to program your DCC decoders.
I have been a satisfied Digitrax owner and user for the past ten years.
Jim, Modeling the Kansas City Southern Lines in HO scale.
I don't think at the age of 15 he's thinking of his son yet.
Springfield PA
Thanks for all the help. You have been so helpful and i'm going on your website right now. I thought about the mrc system too but didn't know that much about it so maybe i will research more.
Is that your layout cuz its nice.
Thanks again
Your very welcome, Taylor. Look into and try out as many DCC systems as you can. That will help you make the best informed choice for YOU. What works best for me or someone else may not be what meets your needs.
And thank you for the kind words and the encouragement. Yes, that's my layout. Like others here, it's a work in progress. Keep us posted...
modelbnsfer Hey, I'm trying to decide on the Digtrax Zephyr or the nce power cab. New to hobby and only 15, not alot of $$$$$. What is better and easier to set up.Thanks for the HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Of course so much depends on your layout, number of locos running at the same time and your own personal preferences.
Since cost appears to be important to you, the Power Cab might be a good choice at about $150. This is a 1.7 amp system with a 7' tethered throttle that can't be unplugged and moved so you're limited to operating from one postion with a little movement per the cord length.
If you need more movement, or to walk around the layout you could add a 2nd throttle for about $72..
If you need more than 1.7 amps you could add a Smart Booster and power supply for about $108.
Now, the Zephyr at 2.5 amps would probably be enough power for a home layout at about $160. You would have to operate from a fixed position or add $65 for a 2nd walk-around throttle.
With any walk-around scheme you would have some additional cost for each plug-in panel located around the layout, probalbly around $15 each.
One other consideration would be the MRC Prodigy Advance Squared system at about $194. This is a full-featured 3.5 amp system that could take care of your needs for a long time and maybe never need expansion, unless you would want to go radio.
All of the above systems have computer interfaces available, except the MRC interface is limited to MRC's proprietory system and will not work with the more popular JMRI software.
All of these systems are very easy to set up and use with MRC probably being the easiest to learn to operate but they are all pretty easy. The individual throttles are going to be important to you as to which one you will like the feel and touch of. Check each one out careully on the manufacturer's websites and don't hesitate to ask more about each of them here on this forum.
A lot of things to think about and some great choices available. I hope you can pick one that really works well for you.
Jerry
Rio Grande vs. Santa Fe.....the battle is over but the glory remains!
Hey Taylor,
I have an NCE Powercab and love it. The main reason is the fact that it is tethered and has menus that help you enhance your operating experience by following the directions on the screen in plain English. It is true that the Powercab does have to stay plugged in as it is the command station but I simply ordered a 10 foot six wire coil cord from http://www.litchfieldstation.com/DCC-University/index.htm
and was able to move to any viewing spot on my 15X17 N scale layout. There is no computer interface but one is available for the NCE separately. Eventually you will likely invest in the interface. There is no DC functionality with the NCE but the Zephyr can utilize 2 DC throttles. Do a comparison at the above mentioned link to see more options side by side you may be interested in.
If you are running N-scale then 1.7 amps is actually enough to run many trains. I have had 7 locos running with my Powercab alone and after about an hour it showed no issues. Before someone says this cannot be done with a recall stack of 2 remember that the decoder will remember the last command even though you don't have it dialed up on the throttle.
Lots to consider my friend.
John
spidge Hey Taylor, It is true that the Powercab does have to stay plugged in as it is the command station but I simply ordered a 10 foot six wire coil cord from http://www.litchfieldstation.com/DCC-University/index.htm and was able to move to any viewing spot on my 15X17 N scale layout.
It is true that the Powercab does have to stay plugged in as it is the command station but I simply ordered a 10 foot six wire coil cord from http://www.litchfieldstation.com/DCC-University/index.htm and was able to move to any viewing spot on my 15X17 N scale layout.
That's an important point. A coiled cord is so much easier to deal with as you walk around your layout. The Prodigy Advance Squared also comes with a flat cord, although I understand that coiled cords can be purchased for it. Digitrax throttles come with coiled cords.
jwils1spidge Hey Taylor, It is true that the Powercab does have to stay plugged in as it is the command station but I simply ordered a 10 foot six wire coil cord from http://www.litchfieldstation.com/DCC-University/index.htm and was able to move to any viewing spot on my 15X17 N scale layout. That's an important point. <snip>
That's an important point.
<snip>
You're right, it is an important point!
Keep in mind that with the Power Cab, that hand-held throttle is also the command station. That means that all the current being used by the layout goes through that coiled cord twice - Once from the power supply to the throttle, and then from the throttle to the track.
Since a coiled cord of that type typically has rather small gauge wire, typically 26 AWG, in order to remain flexible, you have to consider voltage drop. After all, you wouldn't use 26 AWG for your track bus under the layout, would you? Well, with a Power Cab, what's feeding both the command station and the track bus bus? Yup, that coiled cord consisting of 26 AWG conductors.
I believe the Power Cab has a 7-foot cord, and you added a 10-foot extension for a total of 17 feet each way. According to the calculator at this Web site, 34 feet of 26 AWG (remember, the current traverses this cable twice) at 12 VDC or single-phase AC (closest to a DCC waveform that is has listed) and 1.7 amps gives you a voltage drop of 4.852 volts, or about 40%!
Of course, that's a worse case scenario because you probably don't always use the full 1.7 amps that the Power Cab is capable of delivering. But even at .75 amp (two sound locos?) the drop is still over 2 volts, or about 19%.
I know I sure wouldn't use 17 feet of 26 AWG between my power supply and my Command Station, or between my CS and my track bus. But that's what you're doing when you you add that 10-foot extension to your Power Cab.
Will the Power Cab's built-in short circuit protection even still work with that kind of resistance (and the resulting voltage drop) in the circuit? Food for thought...
Steve
Steve,
I believe John was saying that he used a 10' 6-wire cable instead of the 7' cable that comes with the Power Cab; not that he added them together.
tstage Steve, I believe John was saying that he used a 10' 6-wire cable instead of the 7' cable that comes with the Power Cab; not that he added them together. Tom
Thanks Tom, that is correct. Also, as I said before using this 10' 6 wire coil cord I have ran 7 locos. I have thought about voltage drop and determined that I would rarely need to run that many locos so its no issue. Anyway I moved on to the SB3 and never use the six wire cord for track power anyway.
spidge tstage Steve, I believe John was saying that he used a 10' 6-wire cable instead of the 7' cable that comes with the Power Cab; not that he added them together. Tom Thanks Tom, that is correct. Also, as I said before using this 10' 6 wire coil cord I have ran 7 locos. I have thought about voltage drop and determined that I would rarely need to run that many locos so its no issue. Anyway I moved on to the SB3 and never use the six wire cord for track power anyway.
Okay, going back to the site I linked to before, and plugging in "only" 20 feet of 26 AWG at 12VDC and .75 amps (two sound locos), you still get a 10.49% voltage drop, or about 1.25 to 1.5 volts depending on the specific track voltage.
Put another way, with a .75 amp load, that 10-foot cable itself would need dissipate roughly a full watt of heat just from the voltage drop. You might not think it's an issue, but it's certainly not a situation I'd knowingly introduce on my layout.
Stevertspidge tstage Steve, I believe John was saying that he used a 10' 6-wire cable instead of the 7' cable that comes with the Power Cab; not that he added them together. Tom Thanks Tom, that is correct. Also, as I said before using this 10' 6 wire coil cord I have ran 7 locos. I have thought about voltage drop and determined that I would rarely need to run that many locos so its no issue. Anyway I moved on to the SB3 and never use the six wire cord for track power anyway. Okay, going back to the site I linked to before, and plugging in "only" 20 feet of 26 AWG at 12VDC and .75 amps (two sound locos), you still get a 10.49% voltage drop, or about 1.25 to 1.5 volts depending on the specific track voltage. Put another way, with a .75 amp load, that 10-foot cable itself would need dissipate roughly a full watt of heat just from the voltage drop. You might not think it's an issue, but it's certainly not a situation I'd knowingly introduce on my layout. Steve
I see John mentioned that he wasn't using the Power Cab as the command station, he is using an SB3.
spidge If you are running N-scale then 1.7 amps is actually enough to run many trains. I have had 7 locos running with my Powercab alone and after about an hour it showed no issues.
If you are running N-scale then 1.7 amps is actually enough to run many trains. I have had 7 locos running with my Powercab alone and after about an hour it showed no issues.
I've always felt that the Power Cab is a good choice If you will never need more than 1.7 amps, and if you will never need more than two throttles, or one throttle and a computer interface, and if you like the feel and operation of their throttles.
If any of these ifs don't work for you then the Zephyr may be the better choice, unless of course one doesn't like the Digitrax throttles either. But the Zephyr does have the better upgrade path and I'm guessing that it would be the next choice for most.
The throttle is the interface between user and system and ones ultimate enjoyment of their system is going to weigh heavily on how the throttle feels and what it can or can't do.
It's too bad potential buyers don't have the chance to try out each throttle but I doubt if many hobby shops offer this opportunity. Even the great Caboose Hobbies only has a display with NCE, Digitrax and Lenz throttles hooked up to a track and then it's only their primary throttles and no track loop or turnouts to really try everything, and I've never seen them display any of the auxilliary throttles, and have no MRC throttles.
So Taylor, ask as many questions as you can here, at hobby shops, train shows and clubs to get as much feedback as you can about systems and their throttles, and especially throttles as how they feel in your hand and how they do things can make a big difference. The more you know the better your chance of making a good choice.
Judging on the good job the NCE engineers did on the overall design of the power cab, I'd bet that they figured the drop in. Before upgrading I ran mine loaded up and had no issues. I do think that the flat cable provided with the cab just might be heavier than 26 gauge though. Cat 5 cable for instance is 24 gauge.
I have a Zephyr on my small layout at home. It has so far worked for everything I want to do, and it lets me run a mix of decoder equipped and non decoder equipped locomotives. Though the Zephyr is a bit limited past the scope of smallish layouts, it is a great starting point and will become a solid core to a larger DCC system. Just my opinion.
Cahrn
Hamltnblue...I do think that the flat cable provided with the cab just might be heavier than 26 gauge though...
I am a big fan of Digitrax's system design and feel that if you desire to get into any signalling, detection, and/or automated or PC controlled operations and want it all integrated, Digitrax is the way to go. That being said, I do feel that NCE's systems are good systems and better suited for many people.
jwils1I've always felt that the Power Cab is a good choice If you will never need more than 1.7 amps, and if you will never need more than two throttles, or one throttle and a computer interface, and if you like the feel and operation of their throttles.
CSX Robert jwils1I've always felt that the Power Cab is a good choice If you will never need more than 1.7 amps, and if you will never need more than two throttles, or one throttle and a computer interface, and if you like the feel and operation of their throttles. While I don't exactly agree with this, one thing I do not like about the Power Cab is it's upgrade path. Of course the Power Cab can be used as a Pro Cab on a Power Pro system, and I like that feature. You can also upgrade it with the Smart Booster, but if you think you will ever want more than the 4 cab limit of the Smart Boooster, then you are better off going straight to the Power Pro system because if you go to the Smart Booster and then Power Pro, the Smart Booster will no longer be useable in the system - not even as just a booster. It is also important to remember that the PC interface and any other cab bus accessories, such as the micro panel, use cab addresses and cut into the number of cabs you can use.
While I don't exactly agree with this, one thing I do not like about the Power Cab is it's upgrade path. Of course the Power Cab can be used as a Pro Cab on a Power Pro system, and I like that feature. You can also upgrade it with the Smart Booster, but if you think you will ever want more than the 4 cab limit of the Smart Boooster, then you are better off going straight to the Power Pro system because if you go to the Smart Booster and then Power Pro, the Smart Booster will no longer be useable in the system - not even as just a booster. It is also important to remember that the PC interface and any other cab bus accessories, such as the micro panel, use cab addresses and cut into the number of cabs you can use.
I'm not so sure that the statement regarding using the PC interface with the Super Booster or Power Cab cuts the number of cabs by one is correct. There are reserved cab addresses for specific uses, and I believe the 2 or 4 cab limit is still valid after adding the PC interface. But I'm willing to be proven wrong by an actual user.
Be that as it may, knowing the desired end state - particularly number of throttles - is as important in DCC planning as it is in DC. Otherwise, one ends up with dead end upgrade paths and wasted money. Not that all throttles have to be bought immediately - but provision does have to be made for the eventual total number. Even if some of the throttles will come from friends bringing their own, the total has to be planned for.
If remaining at a single or 2 operator level (2 throttles), to me the preferred form factor should be one of the drivers in the choice between NCE and Digitraxx and MRC. If you want all walk-around throttles, MRC and NCE are cheaper starting points. If you prefer a central panel operation, then the Zephyr makes more sense.
One more point - if operating more than 2 walk-around tethered throttles simultaneously, you are going to run into tangled tethers on most layouts (DC or DCC). Wireless is the obvious solution to the problem, but brings another level of costs and upgrade planning.
my thoughts, your choices
Fred W
Fred, excellent summary.
I am a Digitrax Z user, but really like NCE products as well. When I purchased my Z there was not a choice. The PowerCab was not released yet and MRC had not yet moved onto their current line of DCC systems. Had I had a choice at the time, the Power Cab would have received very strong consideration as I like the form factor of the throttle.
Having said that, looking at where I am now, I would have hit the extent of the upgrade path on the PowerCab. The throttle limit is what would have nailed me. From day 1, there have been 3 of us using the layout simultaneously. We used the Z throttle and the 2 jump throttles. We quickly added a DT400 dual throttle bringing us up to an effective 5 throttles. Have since added a UT4 and a PC with virtual throttles. It is not unusual for me and the 2 boys to have 5 throttles in use all the time. We have also added a DB150 booster and are about to add at new DT402D and UR92 duplex wireless (in transit as we speak). All of which has and will be added with my trusty Z as the command station at the center of it all. Nothing redundant. This would not have been possible with the PowerCab, other than going right to a ProCab and avoiding the Smart Booster.
So I would concur. If you don't have any real plans to upgrade the system in the future, and the Power Cab meets your needs, it is a great system. If you think you might follow a path like me then you can't go wrong with the Zephyr.
Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum
simon1966 So I would concur. If you don't have any real plans to upgrade the system in the future, and the Power Cab meets your needs, it is a great system. If you think you might follow a path like me then you can't go wrong with the Zephyr.
I think this kind of sums it up or close to it for me. I kept my layout size restricted on purpose and can only keep 4 people busy for a couple hours. Now when I was looking to get started the main issue for me was the human interface and the Powercab looked more user friendly as I am not the sharpest tool in the shed. Shoot the SB3 nor the interface were out yet, but were in planning. My intention with this system is use on this layout and maybe take the throttle to someone elses from time to time. Now when I build my dream empire I will revisit all this and decide from there.
I do like the Digitrax loconet system where you can tie in signaling and all that goes with it. There are many pros and cons for each system and two big atvantages I think about is the recall stack of 10 and the jump cabs utilizing DC cabs in the Zephyr.
To each his own and choose what best fits you now and in the next couple years. I would not put to much wieght on features that you may not utilize for 10 years down the road. The idea behind these starter system is just that, get started. If you can afford signalling and such you would skip the starter systems anyway.
I looked at the flat cable that came with my power cab. It has 24awg written on it. Answers that.
I did some checks on my power cab.
With 10 sound decoders sitting on the track they draw .47 amps
With 6 sitting they draw .23 amps.
With 6 on the track, with 4 of them pulling, and sound on they draw about .97 amps. One of my grades is 3.3%
My locos are less than 2 years old so they are of newer design. I like the P. Cab because I find it simple to understand and I can read the CVs easly. I did start out with A Digatrax and changed, No offense to anyone just my .
I don't have enough track to have all 10 locos running at once so I run 4 or 5 off on a siding and cut the power to them.
Have fun.
Lee
simon1966 Had I had a choice at the time, the Power Cab would have received very strong consideration as I like the form factor of the throttle.
This is not the first time I've heard this and I had the same thoughts at one time. I thought a Power Cab/Smart Booster combo would serve my needs for power and number of throttles for a long time, with only an upgrade to radio needed in the future. But the form factor was the killer for me. I was so disappointed once I started using it. NCE is such a fine company, with outstanding product quality, great radio performance, and absolutely wonderful customer service. It was hard for me to give up on NCE but I decided to take a chance on the Zephyr.
I've always admired the Ditgrax philosophy and design, and wasn't disappointed. I started with a Zephyr and DT400, which I think is a perfect combo for many users. I guess I got lucky because the DT400 is, in many respects, just perfect for me. I later added radio, which performed flawlessly, and now I too expect to receive my DT402D/UR92 tomorrow. It took me a while, and had to spend a little money, but I've found the very best system for me, and the form factor was the clincher.
In comparing Digitrax, NCE and MRC there is another consideration that might be important to some. If you want to throw turnouts with your DCC system I've found that Digitrax can do this with fewer button presses and in a smoother, more efficient manner. This was just another little bonus I got with my Digtrax choice.
fwrightI'm not so sure that the statement regarding using the PC interface with the Super Booster or Power Cab cuts the number of cabs by one is correct. There are reserved cab addresses for specific uses, and I believe the 2 or 4 cab limit is still valid after adding the PC interface. But I'm willing to be proven wrong by an actual user.
spidgeIf you can afford signalling and such you would skip the starter systems anyway.