Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Layout plan Mark III... Comments and opinions apreciated

7745 views
37 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Monday, August 22, 2005 11:59 PM
I did not get the mail and I think you can get 30" out of the new layout. You should not have any trouble with 24" if it is just a narrows and not an operating area. And your benchwork can curve. I won't be back on until Weds. good luck. I'll try to check email in the morning.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 22, 2005 11:49 PM
Chip,

On checking it out I might be able to squeaze 30" curve radii into the old benchwork layout ....
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 22, 2005 11:42 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse

Okay,

I think the first challenge will be getting the 30" radius curves. IF you get creative you can do it. Remember you can round the edges of the layout and you can go down to 24" in the aisles as long as you leave your operating areas wide.

The second challenge will be laying out your cities. Look for ways to create scenes in which if you are working one scene, you don't see another. Also, as Dave said, watch your train lengths so that you don't park in one and still be hanging out in another station.

After that it will be locating industrial sidings, yards and staging.

But start with the radii.



Chip, I'd love to have 30" curve radii but I think its a pipe dream [V]... 24" wide isles are going to be too small for the OL and I.. I have 27" radii in must place but yes my inside curves are 24" here is where I am at as of tonight.



Although I liked the diagonal isle but I dropped it to gain some space.



P.S. Did you happen to get the mail I dropped you Sir?



Peace.

Coyote
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Monday, August 22, 2005 10:17 PM
Okay,

I think the first challenge will be getting the 30" radius curves. IF you get creative you can do it. Remember you can round the edges of the layout and you can go down to 24" in the aisles as long as you leave your operating areas wide.

The second challenge will be laying out your cities. Look for ways to create scenes in which if you are working one scene, you don't see another. Also, as Dave said, watch your train lengths so that you don't park in one and still be hanging out in another station.

After that it will be locating industrial sidings, yards and staging.

But start with the radii.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • 1,168 posts
Posted by dgwinup on Monday, August 22, 2005 12:34 PM
I liked the first layout a little better, unless this second post is just an 'idea'. The second layout has no yard, no sidings, just roundy-round with a bottleneck at Diablo. A combination of the two would be awesome!

A layout designed for mainline running sometimes is not adaptable to adding sidings. Knowing in advance where the sidings (and yards) will go is important in planning a layout that you will enjoy for a long time.

Of course, if your last post was just a preliminary 'idea', then, in the words of Rosanne Rosannadanna, " Never mind!"

Darrell, returning to quiet...for now
Darrell, quiet...for now
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 22, 2005 9:52 AM
Coyote,

I do like the longer run effect you have created. I know you are still tweaking, so can't tell where or how much psace is between each town. Can I recommend, if it hasn't already, though I know someone stated that the engine would be in one town while the end would still be in the previous, measure how long the typical or longest passenger train will be in actual feet, and make sure to allow that much space between each town. I think this way you will achieve a more realistic look when operating. With the cad program you are using, does it allow you to send a train around the layout? If so see what a time factor will be. I couldn't on mine, but once it was completed, I was lucky, and ended up with about 20 minutes of run time until I cam back to the point I started at, this was a proto speeds of about 15-25 mph on my little granger route. Not sure how fast they ran in the desert back then.

But it does look better. Are you killing the RIP to benchwork idea? [:(]
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Monday, August 22, 2005 9:11 AM
I won't be able to get into it until late tonight. Mondays are really long days for me. There are things I see I like and other's well.

I have zero experieince with modern passenger lines, but I have read that 30" is a miniumum radius. You should be able to do this.

Did you see the article in MR about passenger terminals and operations?

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 22, 2005 2:41 AM
Ok Gang based on some very good advice from SpaceMouse and all you guys I have done a redesign..

(Chip I think I had one of those expansions of consciousness, you were talking about [:)])

I have layout out the plan to allow longer runs of mainline, so I can include more passing lanes etc, and larger areas for yards and staging..

At this point I have not added in any yardwork, spurs, passing lanes etc this is just a bare bones to test clearances, overall size and curves..

The curve radii here is 24" min and 25" - 27" for inside and outside curves.. #6 turnouts and 3" min between parallel lines and from track to edge of benchwork..

Do you all think this is workable... It's been stretched out to better work with Chip's post above..

Looking forward to hearing from you all...




Peace.

Coyote
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: CANADA
  • 2,292 posts
Posted by ereimer on Sunday, August 21, 2005 12:38 PM
this just gets better all the time . the canyon diable scene and bridge is going to be fantastic!

an amusing thought .... if you head about 50 - 60 miles west from flagstaff to ash fork and turn south , and turn the clock back to 1900 - 1910 you'll be on the Santa Fe , Prescott and Phoenix , the railroad i'm basing my layout on [:)]
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 1,619 posts
Posted by West Coast S on Saturday, August 20, 2005 5:48 PM
By all means I would included the Apache.....Here's my thoughts on the matter..

You could route the Apache in the area of T18, off the Holbrook branch and terminate along the aisle behind Dennison, you could depress the track or use scenery to disguise it from normal view and impart a sense of distance.

So what have we accomplished? Additional operation! In this scenario, the Holbrook branch would begain at the south end of the new yard, continuing southbound, for a interchange with the Apache, the Holbrook branch would then continue east to terminate at Y15.


The above arraignment would permit live interchange, moving cars from the Apache to the yard and vice versa. One small note, I would include an additional crossover between the two mains at Winslow to permit operating flexibilty.

Don't see a logical reason to remove the ballest pit at darling, as stated previously I would make no changes to any of the industrial spurs.

Getting ahead a bit, I would use a photo backdrop of Diablo canyon behind the bridge and blend the scenery to tie it all together. A little illusion goes a long ways!


I do like the concept you've got going, I could get into a track plan like this.

Dave
SP the way it was in S scale
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, August 20, 2005 5:17 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by West Coast S

Relocate Flagstaff to area A5, eliminate the third track diverging at Diablo (K23), eliminate Joseph City and the return feature for a good sized yard. Radical enough?

Canyon Diablo should be the focal point. Since passenger operation is the primary traffic , you have a proper balance of industrial activity in my opinion.

Dave


Dave thanks for the input *nods* sounds like you are near the same page as Chip.. I agree with you both.. I'm gonna try for the 4th redesign tonight and then slap it up here to see what you gents think...

Thanks again.

Coyote
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, August 20, 2005 5:15 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse

Coyote,

Let me see if I have this straight. You are modeling a 100 mile stretch of the Santa Fe between Flagstaff and Holbrook. The three main geography features that I can discern from what you have presented is 1) There is a grade up from Holbrook to Flagstaff. 2) There is a bottleneck at Canyon Diablo and 3) Top of the grade is at or near Angel.

There are 2 "major" cities: Winslow and Flagstaff which are 60 miles apart. The Santa Fe does not end at either Flagstaff or Holbrook, but continues on quire a ways in either direction.

Now looking at the physical space of your layout as you have it currently set up in terms of scenes:

2 at Flagstaff
1 at McPhetridge
1 at Winona Darling
1 at Angel-Diablo
1 at Diablo-Sunshine-Denison
1 at Winslow
1 at Hibbard-Joseph
1 At Holbrook

Ideally, you want your train to pass through each scene only once. A double track like the prototype is fine, but would point out that you have three distinct routes from Diablo to Flagstaff. You simply don't need them. You can do everything with just your dual mainline.

Right now a 6 car passenger train stopping in Denison will still be in Canyon Diablo. Since all the geographic action takes place between the two largest cities, I would suggest modeling between Winslow and Flagstaff.

Your instinct to put a yard at each end location on your layout is good, but the railroad you are modeling really doesn't end as you have it represented. It continues on in both directions. You have really provided the solutions perhaps without noticing.

The yards you have designed are just to small to work well for you.

So this is my solution based upon the info you have supplied. Obviously you have read more about the area than I since I haven't read squat, so you'll have to bring up my errors in assumption.

Make Canyon Diablo / Angel your visual focal point like you have it but do it up big and run it from the mid-point between Dennison and Sunshine to the tip of the Angel side of the peninsula. Make Flagstaff and Winslow the ends of your layout and give them both larger yards. Start your Flagstaff yard where Winona is now. Remove the backdrop from the Flagstaff and expand the city street and add industries. Where the yard terminates in your return loop place your backdrop and run the single track you have nowrunning to A1 behind it. Open that track up to 4-5 tracks for your west staging yard--personally I would just call the area Los Angeles to give it significance as it represents all points west.

Between Angel and Flagstaff you can put a town scene where Darling is now. It can be either Darling or McPhetridge.

ON the other end of the layout the Winslow yard would start where you have Hibbard and extend to V17. What you call Holbrook becomes staging or Albuquerque (all points east.) Denison is where Winslow is now and Sunshine is On the point at N18. All your towns have room for industrial sidings if you choose. You can still connect at U19 (but I would connect via tunnel to maintain the one train per scene illusion.)

Let me know what you think. I know it is hard to visualize from word pictures.





[:0] Now that is some advice!!! [:D]

Chip,
Thank you, that -is- a lot to try and digest and visualize.. Let me see what I can contribute, ask, or comment on .. as far as grade.. yes the land falls away east from flagstaff .. here is an elevation map of the area from the AT&SF (I apologize if the quality is bad), it should expand out some when clicked)



Winslow was a fairly flat area on the line and the AT&SF used the Winslow yard as an interchange to switch cars etc. since it was the only level area for many hundreds of miles in either direction (or at least that is my understanding, if someone knows better please feel free to correct me.).

I see what you mean about too many multiple lines running behind the edges of backdrops and making for unrealistic and displeasing look, I was thinking this same thing myself last night and I agree, it must go.

I do want to keep the double track at all costs. it follows the prototype and I want to be able to have trains pass each other one, one heading 'east' and one heading 'west', to get the look of many tremendious pictures I have seen of the line... Like this one:


(my apologies for not properly crediting the individual who took the picture, I no longer remember who took it. [:(])

I also agree that Canyon Diablo should become a more main foucs, not just scenicly but also because of the bottle neck crossing and the operations that I am gathering will be fun there. However I don't want to stretch it out too much because, although it is an awesome bridge in the middle of nowhere over a fairly deep cut, it isnt too long all the way across as shown here (yes this is a picture happy post [}:)]).

(western side)
(eastern side)

My best guess is that the crossing is somewhere between c. 850 -900 ft. long (which admittedly is c. 10' on the layout, but I feel (don't know, mind you) that some compression would be good so as to not throw off the compression of the rest of the pike....

Now all that being said, I am with you, it needs to be longer at least 4 or 5 feet on the layout I'm thinking right now.

I definately want to keep Darling on the pike for serveral reasons... It has the ballast pit which provides me with some industry originating inside pike (outside of passengers) and a very fine gentleman, Mr. George Harris (*tips his hat to George*),who has provided me with countless pictures, maps and details used to live in darling and it is a sign of appreciation to a good man to keep it there... did I mention the ballast pit also? [;)]

Following your idea, what do you think of the idea of trying to keep Holbrook in but adding in some of the short line for the Apache Railway that runs almost due south out of Holbrook (perhaps using it as staging??), good idea, or unrealistic pipe dream..

I'll sit down and try and draw out some of your advise and post it tonight or tomorrow.

Any more you can add is always welcomed..

Thank you again greatly for your sound advice.


Peace.

Coyote
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 1,619 posts
Posted by West Coast S on Saturday, August 20, 2005 12:54 PM
Relocate Flagstaff to area A5, eliminate the third track diverging at Diablo (K23), eliminate Joseph City and the return feature for a good sized yard. Radical enough?

Canyon Diablo should be the focal point. Since passenger operation is the primary traffic , you have a proper balance of industrial activity in my opinion.

Dave
SP the way it was in S scale
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Saturday, August 20, 2005 9:16 AM
Coyote,

Let me see if I have this straight. You are modeling a 100 mile stretch of the Santa Fe between Flagstaff and Holbrook. The three main geography features that I can discern from what you have presented is 1) There is a grade up from Holbrook to Flagstaff. 2) There is a bottleneck at Canyon Diablo and 3) Top of the grade is at or near Angel.

There are 2 "major" cities: Winslow and Flagstaff which are 60 miles apart. The Santa Fe does not end at either Flagstaff or Holbrook, but continues on quire a ways in either direction.

Now looking at the physical space of your layout as you have it currently set up in terms of scenes:

2 at Flagstaff
1 at McPhetridge
1 at Winona Darling
1 at Angel-Diablo
1 at Diablo-Sunshine-Denison
1 at Winslow
1 at Hibbard-Joseph
1 At Holbrook

Ideally, you want your train to pass through each scene only once. A double track like the prototype is fine, but would point out that you have three distinct routes from Diablo to Flagstaff. You simply don't need them. You can do everything with just your dual mainline.

Right now a 6 car passenger train stopping in Denison will still be in Canyon Diablo. Since all the geographic action takes place between the two largest cities, I would suggest modeling between Winslow and Flagstaff.

Your instinct to put a yard at each end location on your layout is good, but the railroad you are modeling really doesn't end as you have it represented. It continues on in both directions. You have really provided the solutions perhaps without noticing.

The yards you have designed are just to small to work well for you.

So this is my solution based upon the info you have supplied. Obviously you have read more about the area than I since I haven't read squat, so you'll have to bring up my errors in assumption.

Make Canyon Diablo / Angel your visual focal point like you have it but do it up big and run it from the mid-point between Dennison and Sunshine to the tip of the Angel side of the peninsula. Make Flagstaff and Winslow the ends of your layout and give them both larger yards. Start your Flagstaff yard where Winona is now. Remove the backdrop from the Flagstaff and expand the city street and add industries. Where the yard terminates in your return loop place your backdrop and run the single track you have nowrunning to A1 behind it. Open that track up to 4-5 tracks for your west staging yard--personally I would just call the area Los Angeles to give it significance as it represents all points west.

Between Angel and Flagstaff you can put a town scene where Darling is now. It can be either Darling or McPhetridge.

ON the other end of the layout the Winslow yard would start where you have Hibbard and extend to V17. What you call Holbrook becomes staging or Albuquerque (all points east.) Denison is where Winslow is now and Sunshine is On the point at N18. All your towns have room for industrial sidings if you choose. You can still connect at U19 (but I would connect via tunnel to maintain the one train per scene illusion.)

Let me know what you think. I know it is hard to visualize from word pictures.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, August 20, 2005 1:18 AM
Ken & Selector,

Ok I think I understand the principle now, thank both of you gents a lot....

Now all I have to figure out is how to institute such a thing.. hrmmm well Chip said it should be relatively easy... sooooo

Back to the drawing board.


Thanks again.

Coyote
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Saturday, August 20, 2005 1:09 AM
Grandpa, Chip is talking about when an engine is leading a train and has to drop a car at a point, but the car is in the middle of the train, or even right up at the loco. The loco can stop, separate the train at the rear coupling of the subject car, and pull forward to drop the car where he needs to. He then coninues past the 'runaround' switch. It reverses along the adjacent track (the runaround), and past the lower switch, and hooks up to the rest of the train he left parked. Now a whole train, he continues along his route, with car(s) delivered.

I hope I got that right.
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Christchurch New Zealand
  • 1,525 posts
Posted by NZRMac on Saturday, August 20, 2005 12:35 AM
A Runaround is pulling a train forwards in to a siding, uncoupling moving forward (loco only) Throwing a turnout and reversing past the train to another turnout back onto the siding, throwing that turnout and hooking on the back end of the train or leaving the train there and moving out of the siding in reverse.

Ken.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, August 20, 2005 12:21 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse

This is from a post I did for GDS.

Suppose that you want to set off a car in your upper right hand siding. Right now, your engince can pull the car in, but not be able to get the engine out without backing the car out.

With a runaround you can pull the train onto the track right next to the red track I drew in on the left. You diconnect the train at the coupler directly in front of the car you want to drop off. The front part of the train pulls a head and backs int the siding and back onto the main to position itself in the back of the train. The engine then moves forward pushing the car into the side where it can disconect, thereby leaving the car.

It then pulls the train back on to the main adjacent the siding, disconnects the engine from the rear of the train. The engine (and cars) then runs around and positions itself in front of the train and reconnects.



The same type action happens near the yard. Then engine drops of the train on the main and uses the siding to get behind the train. It can then drop the cars (classifies them) in the appropriate classification track. If they are all mixed up, this will result in the train backing out and changing tracks quite a bit to get them sorted.


Chip
I'm sorry but I dont follow at all. [:(] [D)]

I searched through John Armstrongs book but haven't found anything yet that helps explain it to me either...

Maybe another try?

Coyote
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: CANADA
  • 2,292 posts
Posted by ereimer on Friday, August 19, 2005 11:42 PM
if you add another track or 2 to the area a tthe workbench it could become a staging area representing the world west of flagstaff . to really make things work you'd need more staging tracks over by holbrook

fantastic work so far , i really like the plan . chip's comment about your interests evolving before the layout is 'complete' may be valid . while it's certainly great fun to run a beautiful passenger train through well done scenery , how often can you do it before it becomes just another lap around the layout ? staging helps a lot with this as you can build several trains to be run through the layout during a session , heavy traffic through canyon diablo is going to be fun !
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, August 19, 2005 11:23 PM
Although you can do passenger operations on a layout, I'm not familiar with passenger operations as apply to your layout. There is an article in this months MR that talks about a passenger terminal. You might want to check that out.

Last week in order to get the club members familiar how we renamed the locations on the layout, we made up a series of 8 trains or so and sent people out. Basically they moved from town to town hold a specific amount of time at each specified station. Each person who ran a route completed a circuit in 30-45 minutes. No one wanted to take out a second train. The challenge of passenger trains is composing proper cars for the route traffic and abiding by a time table.

Many people love this kind of railroading. I prefer moving freight in and out of sidings, providing materials for industries and picking up finished product. I like a passenger train running through and messing up the freight schedule, but to me a passenger train is an obstacle. At most op sessions I've been to, passenger trains are for newbees. If there are no newbees, we have to ask for volunteers, etc. Most everyone prefers the challenge of freights. It just seems like there is more to do, more to figure out.

Passenger trains run just fine on mainlines that have a lot of industrial switching. Freighters that don't have industrial spurs just run around the track, but don't stop for passengers.

You have a lot of good space for a layout, yet what I see so far is a lot of running with little to do. I'm not saying that you can't get there from here. I just don't see it. My gut feeling is that you are still a couple evolutions of consciousness away.

Think about it this way. You are building a layout that may take upwards of 5 years to build. Will you have evolved beyond it before it is done?

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, August 19, 2005 10:51 PM
This is from a post I did for GDS.

Suppose that you want to set off a car in your upper right hand siding. Right now, your engince can pull the car in, but not be able to get the engine out without backing the car out.

With a runaround you can pull the train onto the track right next to the red track I drew in on the left. You diconnect the train at the coupler directly in front of the car you want to drop off. The front part of the train pulls a head and backs int the siding and back onto the main to position itself in the back of the train. The engine then moves forward pushing the car into the side where it can disconect, thereby leaving the car.

It then pulls the train back on to the main adjacent the siding, disconnects the engine from the rear of the train. The engine (and cars) then runs around and positions itself in front of the train and reconnects.



The same type action happens near the yard. Then engine drops of the train on the main and uses the siding to get behind the train. It can then drop the cars (classifies them) in the appropriate classification track. If they are all mixed up, this will result in the train backing out and changing tracks quite a bit to get them sorted.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 19, 2005 9:28 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by GearDrivenSteam

Grandpa, it looks really nice. You're gonna have a lot of fun with something that size.


Thanks Gear... the OL and are looking forward to a enjoyable time over the next few years putting it altogether... I'll probably wake the neighboors with hoots on the day its done for its first run [:D]

Coyote
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 19, 2005 9:26 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse

What's the purpose of the track that ends at 10 B-C?


It is one end of the Point to Point outer line.. In all honesty I wasn't sure how to fit it back into the yard there [:I]

Coyote
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 19, 2005 9:24 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by RevMattCNJ

I like the bottleneck. Those are the types of things that make DCC such a blast.


RevMatt,

Yes it looks like it will be fun [:D]

But boy was it a [censored] to get to work at least for a tenderfoot like me [;)]



Coyote
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 19, 2005 9:22 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jacon12

Coyote,
I'm still very much a novice at all this so I can't comment on yours, but if you don't mind a question.... what type industries are you thinking of and where would they be located on your layout? I know you still must be in the preliminary stage of it but I thought if you had already figured those things out it would be interesting to know.
Thanks,
JaRRell



JaRRell,
The industry I'm primarily running is Passangers... But I also plan on running Ballast out of Darling (shown in the updated pic) and some already processed lumber coming into Flagstaff.

Coyote
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 19, 2005 9:20 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dthurman

Coyote

My take on staging was always to have it more out of the way, which is why I thought what I did. Guess I need to re-look at your design.

On the benchwork, I am just curious as to how you plan to do it, but more important, would love to see the completed idea. I ask because I want to do the same thing.


David the idea right now is that, that single track shotting of the layout will run along a fairly thin stretch of benchwork, with no scenicing on it, across to the top level of a 9' x 3' built in wooden worktable that was in the garage when the OL and first got the house.. once over there the train could be taken off the track directly like in a fiddle yard to be worked on/repaired/painted/what have you.. and then put back on that track and allowed to run back into the yard just below it... at least that is what is my head.. it might just be madness [:)]


Coyote
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 19, 2005 9:07 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse

Hi,

I think it is 100% improvement. Like Jarrel I would like to know what the industries are and how the towns are located.

All of the yards and spurs need runarounds. The yards especially. The way you have them set up are head in. Once an engine heads in, how does it drop off the cars and get out. That is an easy fix.

You have double tracks for most of the main. Personally I prefer a single track with strategically located passing sidings. It ads a lot of operational complexity--and more fun when operating with your pards.

ON th subject of staging I dug this up for GearDrivenSteam. It was a soap box I got on a while back..

***

To the casual observer, staging just isn't that important. Just a place to store trains. True, but it is the conceptual part of what staging represents that makes it important and changes a train set into a model railroad. Staging represents a link with the rest of the world.

Lets take a brewery as an example. Without a staging yard, you can pick beer up, and you can bring back empties. Just like the liquor store--it magically appears. But in the real world, the brewery needs hops, barley, preservatives, fuel, glass, aluminum, etc. etc. Without a stating yard where do these things come from? You could add a hops farm. But then where does the fertilizer come from for the hops. You just can't make an enclosed system that works like the real world. You have to suspend a lot of reality and give up a lot of operabilty.

With a staging yard, the hops can come from somewhere else. The diesel fuel needed at the coal mine can come from somewhere else. The town's factories can be suppled raw materials from somewhere else. And all their goods can be shipped somewhere else.

In other words, what you can do with your layout is expanded exponentially.

Even if all you can do is get a track or two under your "low hills" you are opening up a world or possibilities.





Space mouse great food for thought as always! Thank you [tup]

I have updated the layout to show the towns (many of which are tiny little places and will only be shown in part, in case you worry about there being so many [:)]). I'll post the new picture at the end of this post.

Ok silly question of the year: What is a runaround? [D)] (meaning I have no idea what one looks like in terms of trackwork [%-)][:I] Any source/pic/drawning you might direct me to?)

As for industries: my primary industry in this area is Passangers.. although when I can get some more cars etc. I will be putting in the ballast pit at Darling (which was the main ballast pit for the entire AT&SF railroad) and run Ballast out of there... How easy will that be in terms of getting realistic loads for my cars [:)] just buy extra ballast. [;)] Also some processed timber/lumber comes into Flagstaff.

As to the double track its there to reflect that this entire line was double track on the prototype.

Here is the updated Pic:




Also if you any of the gang is intrested here is the prototype line:



Thanks again SpaceMouse always great stuff from you buddy.. looking forward to hearing back.

Coyote
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 19, 2005 9:04 PM
Grandpa, it looks really nice. You're gonna have a lot of fun with something that size.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, August 19, 2005 8:55 PM
What's the purpose of the track that ends at 10 B-C?

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!