Code 55 vs. Code 80

[Anonymous]

I'm getting ready to start my first "real" layout--my first project was a small 16" by 3' diorama to help me get a feel for the various aspects of model railroading before I dove into a larger project. I used code 55 (N-scale) for the diorama, but I am considering using code 80 track for a larger layout, due to the wider variety of track pieces/ accessories to choose from, and also I have had some troubles with power loss as my locos went thru code 55 turnouts. Any pros or cons on the 2 types of track from those who have used both types? I used Atlas code 55 track and turnouts on my diorama.

[nfmisso]

code 80 is way oversize for N scale, about right for HO.

You need an electrical bus, and feeders to the rails every 3 ft or so.

code 55 is a bit more fragile.

[Anonymous]

I love the look of Code 55, but I am at a loss, how should I wire the switches? insulate them completely and give them there own feeders, I am using the Digitrax Zephyr

[Anonymous]

I am about to build a new layout and I am going to use the new Atlas code 55

I will only buy the switches and the flex track- Why buy individual peices if I can cut them out of flex track?

I have not used the code 55 yet but I am impressed with it's looks and the fact that the switches use an all metal frog. I would think that that would help with any power loss problems.