Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

which code of track????

1783 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
which code of track????
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 2, 2004 11:14 PM
im just tonight getting started on the benchwork for my new layout. I know im not at this point yet but what would you guys suggest for track code on mainlines. 100 or 83?
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: California
  • 263 posts
Posted by EL PARRo on Thursday, June 3, 2004 12:33 AM
I suggest code 83. It is much more protoypical than code 100. Code 100 is better for things like hidden staging
huh?
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,474 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Thursday, June 3, 2004 8:15 AM
Two thoughts one actual and one model:
1. If you plan to model the PRR corridor then code 100 is perfect because it is the size rail the PRR used there
2. If you plan to run equipment with oversize flanges the you will also need to run Code 100.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Nova Scotia
  • 825 posts
Posted by BentnoseWillie on Thursday, June 3, 2004 9:09 AM
Assuming you're into HO, I'd suggest starting with Code 100 unless you intend this layout to last you forever - and the first layout rarely does. Code 100 offers the widest variety of components from the widest variety of manufacturers, and is generally the least expensive. It also is available most anywhere model trains are sold, whereas many shops carry smaller sizes on a more limited basis, if at all.

I keep hearing references to problems with deep flanges and Code 83 track, but in nearly 30 years around model trains I have neither seen it happen nor heard a firsthand account of it. Older Rivarossi and Lima engines had flanges too deep for anything smaller than code 83, as do some Steamers made by Mehano (sold as Mehano, IHC, Model Power, AHM, and "President's Choice").

I prefer the look of Code 83 on main lines and Code 70 on spurs and sidings. I may also add some code 55 for some real nasty bits.
B-Dubya -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inside every GE is an Alco trying to get out...apparently, through the exhaust stack!
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: San Jose, California
  • 3,154 posts
Posted by nfmisso on Thursday, June 3, 2004 9:28 AM
If smooth reliable operation is more important to you: code 100.

If prototypical appearance is more important to you code 83 (or even code 70) for the mainlines, and smaller for branch lines, industries, etc.
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 3, 2004 1:28 PM
Originally posted by BentnoseWillie

Assuming you're into HO, I'd suggest starting with Code 100 unless you intend this layout to last you forever - and the first layout rarely does.



who said its my first layout? its my 3rd, but anyway, i have some older IHC engines that i like so i think im gonna go with the code 100.



  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Nova Scotia
  • 825 posts
Posted by BentnoseWillie on Thursday, June 3, 2004 1:35 PM
I didn't know, so I had to make an assumption. Your IHC engines will probably be fine on Code 83 - I've never seen or heard a firsthand account of such problems with 83 - but 100 has the virtue of being more widely available at a lower cost.
B-Dubya -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inside every GE is an Alco trying to get out...apparently, through the exhaust stack!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 4, 2004 12:41 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by EL PARRo

I suggest code 83. It is much more protoypical than code 100. Code 100 is better for things like hidden staging


i agree
code 83 is perfect for mainline traffic, code 100 is also good for heavy grades and hiddin mainline track. code 70 is perfect for branch line and industrail and spur tracks
i hope i have been some help to you[8D][8D][8D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 6, 2004 1:12 PM
My 30 + year old Rivarossi 2-8-8-2 will stall at low speeds going through Atlas code 83 Snap Switches. It gets through at medium speeds. My Rivarossi 0-8-0 (also 30 + years old) bumps up and down a bit but gets through at any speed. Others with old wide flange Riv’s. report no problems with Code 83 but I do not know what kind of track / turnouts they are using. The IHC 4-6-2 does not have any problem with Code 83.

Can you really tell the difference between Code 100 and Code 83 from more than a couple of feet away?

Hugo

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!