Originally posted by BentnoseWillie Assuming you're into HO, I'd suggest starting with Code 100 unless you intend this layout to last you forever - and the first layout rarely does. who said its my first layout? its my 3rd, but anyway, i have some older IHC engines that i like so i think im gonna go with the code 100. Reply Edit BentnoseWillie Member sinceJanuary 2002 From: Nova Scotia 825 posts Posted by BentnoseWillie on Thursday, June 3, 2004 1:35 PM I didn't know, so I had to make an assumption. Your IHC engines will probably be fine on Code 83 - I've never seen or heard a firsthand account of such problems with 83 - but 100 has the virtue of being more widely available at a lower cost. B-Dubya -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inside every GE is an Alco trying to get out...apparently, through the exhaust stack! Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 4, 2004 12:41 PM QUOTE: Originally posted by EL PARRo I suggest code 83. It is much more protoypical than code 100. Code 100 is better for things like hidden staging i agree code 83 is perfect for mainline traffic, code 100 is also good for heavy grades and hiddin mainline track. code 70 is perfect for branch line and industrail and spur tracks i hope i have been some help to you[8D][8D][8D] Reply Edit Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 6, 2004 1:12 PM My 30 + year old Rivarossi 2-8-8-2 will stall at low speeds going through Atlas code 83 Snap Switches. It gets through at medium speeds. My Rivarossi 0-8-0 (also 30 + years old) bumps up and down a bit but gets through at any speed. Others with old wide flange Riv’s. report no problems with Code 83 but I do not know what kind of track / turnouts they are using. The IHC 4-6-2 does not have any problem with Code 83. Can you really tell the difference between Code 100 and Code 83 from more than a couple of feet away? Hugo Reply Edit Subscriber & Member Login Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more! Login Register Users Online There are no community member online Search the Community ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Model Railroader Newsletter See all Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox! Sign up
who said its my first layout? its my 3rd, but anyway, i have some older IHC engines that i like so i think im gonna go with the code 100. Reply Edit BentnoseWillie Member sinceJanuary 2002 From: Nova Scotia 825 posts Posted by BentnoseWillie on Thursday, June 3, 2004 1:35 PM I didn't know, so I had to make an assumption. Your IHC engines will probably be fine on Code 83 - I've never seen or heard a firsthand account of such problems with 83 - but 100 has the virtue of being more widely available at a lower cost. B-Dubya -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inside every GE is an Alco trying to get out...apparently, through the exhaust stack! Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 4, 2004 12:41 PM QUOTE: Originally posted by EL PARRo I suggest code 83. It is much more protoypical than code 100. Code 100 is better for things like hidden staging i agree code 83 is perfect for mainline traffic, code 100 is also good for heavy grades and hiddin mainline track. code 70 is perfect for branch line and industrail and spur tracks i hope i have been some help to you[8D][8D][8D] Reply Edit Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 6, 2004 1:12 PM My 30 + year old Rivarossi 2-8-8-2 will stall at low speeds going through Atlas code 83 Snap Switches. It gets through at medium speeds. My Rivarossi 0-8-0 (also 30 + years old) bumps up and down a bit but gets through at any speed. Others with old wide flange Riv’s. report no problems with Code 83 but I do not know what kind of track / turnouts they are using. The IHC 4-6-2 does not have any problem with Code 83. Can you really tell the difference between Code 100 and Code 83 from more than a couple of feet away? Hugo Reply Edit Subscriber & Member Login Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more! Login Register Users Online There are no community member online Search the Community ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Model Railroader Newsletter See all Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox! Sign up
QUOTE: Originally posted by EL PARRo I suggest code 83. It is much more protoypical than code 100. Code 100 is better for things like hidden staging