I havent decided what I'm going to do for subgrade support, it will NOT be the OSB board in the pics, I considered it but it wouldnt last a year even if drowned in preservative before being put down. Maybe i could use something like TREX or similar, or concrete or a mix of both depending on the location. Of course since I'm planning to use stone wall supports I could concievably build up my stone 'faces' with a platform for the track and just float the track on that.
I will be using the OSB boards like in the pics as a template to guide the stone wall construction. I can set the grades and ROWs and then build all the mountains and cliffs around it.
Have fun with your trains
I'm not quite sure on what the problem is but i'd defenatly use steel supports for the risers, be there forever. and for the transitions id get a roll pipe bender and rachet away, a little expensive but for a perfict curve evry time, I'll take the cost, and you can bend almost evrything (including fingers)
I like it big grades, small stock, I can see it now......
(warning BS story comming)
...... The headlines of the Borracho News (the paper) Engeneer fired for spilling coffie!! Will "can do" Tomelson was fired yesterday after taking the owner of the (incert RR name here) railroad in his private inspection car and traveling up the spectacular five persent grades the new coffie machene fell over and sailed out the back wall. It was later recovered but not before old Mr. Tomelson had lost his olny job. Forentally this event has caused an uproar in the local union and undoubtly this will be setteled peacifully.
Now wasn't that a good story?
The head is gray, hands don't work , back is weak, legs give out, eyes are gone, money go's and my wife still love's Me.
Just a couple of pics of the torture track. This is the worst grade on the layout, so far I've found a couple engines I'll need to add weight to for better traction. The last pics shows the kerfed rails on the easment section from grade to level, theres another corved easement at the bottom going into a reverse S curve, I wont have any but I figure thats a great way to test my engines
That is a very aggressive track plan. I would use 1x6 ceader fence boards for track support with side elevation on the turns. to help with the transitions attach all sub-sections to each other, such as a complete loop starting and ending with a strate. wet down the wood and start adding spacers till you get the hight you need, then repeat .weting the ceader will allow it to bend.try it you will like the results.
Looks like you are coming right along!!!
underworld
Hi all,
I've just been testing items in my 5%+ test track, I need to add a transition piece ffrom level to grade and test my larger stock on it, I might need to fabricate a verticly curved transition peice. Anyway, as I said, I'm in no hurry, so testing continues....
John, R2s would increase the layout by 20%, and I just dont have the real estate.
How is the project coming along???
I've gone nuts!
It happens
Hi Vic
Is it possible to do it with a min radius of R2 instead of R1.
You might consider some of these in 45mm gauge
http://www.ipengineering.co.uk/page85.html
regards John
I am with you on that one Tom, and I cannot stress enough the importance of getting your camber correct particularly with regard to points (switches).
Rgds ian
Tom Trigg
I've always liked the Darjeeling....that pic of the Cass looks more like a shot of a roller coaster!!!
Ah well, good luck anyway.
Rgds Ian
Darjeeling RR
http://www.dhr.in/PHOTO%20GALLERY/SOME%20PHOTOGRAPHS%20OF%20DHR/loop3.jpg
http://www.dhr.in/PHOTO%20GALLERY/SOME%20PHOTOGRAPHS%20OF%20DHR/batasia.jpg
Uintah RR
http://home.bresnan.net/~bpratt15/images/UintahMoroCastle.jpg
Mt Tam Scenic RR
http://www.catskillarchive.com/rrextra/mrtama01.jpg
http://www.catskillarchive.com/rrextra/mrtama04.jpg
http://www.catskillarchive.com/rrextra/mrtama03.jpg
Cass Scenic RR
http://im1.shutterfly.com/procserv/47b7dc20b3127cce816fe3e10f7400000016109QZOXDhs4U
Gilpin RR
http://www.gilpintram.com/images/gilpin-tram-5.jpg
http://www.gilpintram.com/images/castleton%20mone%20and%20castle%20rock.jpg
Arizona Copper Co. RR
http://www.vintagephoto.com/reference/coppercreekarticle/cc3.jpg
http://www.vintagephoto.com/reference/coppercreekarticle/cc2.jpg
iandor wrote: Tom mate.I am not going to lambaste you because i don't fully know what it means but i have a fair idea though.I still would advise against it, not just the grades and the curves but to have a dozen sets of points in that area would be a nightmare, really good expensive points will alleviate the situation some though but it will still be trouble.Vic you Americans have invented a type of layout called a double or folded dog bone and it is the best you can have for a small layout; i have one in my area 3 and it has its problems but basically it works well.If you are interested i will get a set of pics posted for you top ahve a look at. 60 m track in 21 m2 and it looks good. I can also advise of the page in the bible where it is drawn up.Rgds Ian
Tom mate.
I am not going to lambaste you because i don't fully know what it means but i have a fair idea though.
I still would advise against it, not just the grades and the curves but to have a dozen sets of points in that area would be a nightmare, really good expensive points will alleviate the situation some though but it will still be trouble.
Vic you Americans have invented a type of layout called a double or folded dog bone and it is the best you can have for a small layout; i have one in my area 3 and it has its problems but basically it works well.
If you are interested i will get a set of pics posted for you top ahve a look at. 60 m track in 21 m2 and it looks good. I can also advise of the page in the bible where it is drawn up.
ttrigg wrote: vsmith wrote: I figure given the short consists I plan to use I should be OK, but next up will be full sized mock ups of a couple of the worst spots and then experiments with various stock, we'll see how that goes. I'm not going to rush this layout. Vic;Nice to see your plan, but you got me in trouble. I printed it and was looking at during the commercials on the tube last night. The wife wanted a look, and then asked "Why doesn't ours go all twisty and turney like this?" To which I replied "It could but that would mean filling in the Koi Pond!" She responded "NO you don't, but maybe we could find some ground over on the other side of the patio." THANKS A WHOLE BUNCH, VIC! As it is it will take me another 3~4 years to finish the current plan, and now she wants to add more! Again THANKS A WHOLE BUNCH!But she did say she would look into getting a "cog"/rack engine in the near future after I told her that LGB had discontinued production of their rack drive engine.
vsmith wrote: I figure given the short consists I plan to use I should be OK, but next up will be full sized mock ups of a couple of the worst spots and then experiments with various stock, we'll see how that goes. I'm not going to rush this layout.
The cog railway should be a lot of fun!!!
For the steep grades you might consider a cog railway.
The voices are correct. The voices are ALWAYS correct :)
Looks like a cool challenge. I say go for it and PLEASE post pics as you go along.
It does look cool on paper....I'm not sure about the grades.
Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month