Trains.com

To go through, behind or in front

4456 views
32 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
To go through, behind or in front
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 6:31 PM

For those who are familiar with my layout; i am reworking area 1 , hence the dialogue elsewhere on this forum. I have 2 aims; 1) is to raise the track between 8 and 16 cm to allow a new section to be connected to it and 2) i had 15 R1 curves in 20 metres and it needed to be straightened out.

But now i have come to beautiful Queensland golden palm, some 5 m high, 4 years old; like many palms it does not have a single trunk but many; so we come to the question of this subject.

1st consideration, under no circumstances do i wish to lose the tree. 2 nd consideration, i wish to damage it as little as possible with consideration 1 in mind. consideration 3 i must straighten the track out.

a) If i go in front tof it, the the rail will be clearly visiible all the time and i do not wish this and it will nearly touch another part of the track (this is a reversing loop as well), however damage to the tree will be not worth considering as it is very minor.

b) If we go through the tree, the problems with solution a) will be greatly reduced and i will have to have a 220 mm hole bored through a 200 mm concrete block wall. I have already got one of these elsewhere and it looks great. cost me A$143.00

c) If i go behind, this will cause the greatest damage to the tree but i will get the track right away from itself and it will hide the track the most, which is desirable. I will have to have two of the above tunnels bored. either 1 or 2 will cost another A$143.00.

I have tried to post pictures of the tree but was unsuccessful

Rgds Ian  

 

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: North, San Diego Co., CA
  • 3,092 posts
Posted by ttrigg on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 7:26 PM

Ian;

Without a pix makes it hard to suggest.  Sounds to me as if the LEAST dammage to the tree would be go in front.   Sounds like you do not have much room on the front side?  Is there enough room to get a respectable distance from the tree, either in fron or behind?

 

Tom Trigg

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:14 PM

No mate it will be jammed in between the other part  of the track and the tree if in front. behind it will be jammed between the tree and a wall, this like all my other areas is a courtyrd.

Rgds Ian

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Pisa, IT
  • 1,474 posts
Posted by RR Redneck on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:22 PM
Sounds like you is stuck 'tween a rock and a hard place.

Lionel collector, stuck in an N scaler's modelling space.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:27 PM

Not really more between a wall and a tree. Every hour or so i vacillate between the 3 solutions, Doreen likes the in front solution but i am leaning toward the right through the middle so we willprobably go behind.

Rgds ian

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:29 PM

The tree must not be caused to suffer because of your RR expansion.  We can always build new RR's but nature's creations sometimes cannot be replaced.  Protect the tree.................

Go in front................ 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Pisa, IT
  • 1,474 posts
Posted by RR Redneck on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:30 PM
If it was me, I would take out all the buildings and as much equipment as possible out of the area, and level the tree, then yank out the trunk and roots. Then just refill and renovate that section of the railroad.

Lionel collector, stuck in an N scaler's modelling space.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 13, 2006 8:16 AM

Ian,

These guys here are the best in there field. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arborist

You need a Arborist in your area to come and look at it. If you can find several that would check and advise you for free or some like when I was landscaping did it for a small fee.

Good Luck, William

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Jones County, Georgia
  • 1,293 posts
Posted by GearDrivenSteam on Wednesday, December 13, 2006 1:14 PM
Trees can be moved.
It is enough that Jesus died and that he died for me.
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Snoqualmie Valley
  • 515 posts
Posted by S&G Rute of the Silver River on Wednesday, December 13, 2006 5:19 PM
I agree w removal, this way you can plant something better like a blue spruce (where you want, Yay blue spruce)
"I'm as alive and awake as the dead without it" Patrick, Snoqualmie WA. Member of North West Railway Museum Caffinallics Anomus (Me)
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Jones County, Georgia
  • 1,293 posts
Posted by GearDrivenSteam on Wednesday, December 13, 2006 8:47 PM
I wasn't saying REmove it. I was saying MOVE it. There's a difference.
It is enough that Jesus died and that he died for me.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 13, 2006 9:05 PM

Redneck read the brief again, this is just what i do not do and will not do.

William, that is a brilliant suggestion, however i think i will need to contact a different mob as this is the tropics and things are different here. For a tree to grow to 4 odd metres  and be as full as this one is, with about 20 trunks (4 serious ones) in 4 years, you will understand that the tropics are a source of rapidly growing flora of all types.

Robert mate Palms and any tree in Australia have terrific root systems to live; as this is a very dry continent (the driest actually) but that is a very good idea though and although it will be hard; i will look into it.

S& G I didn't think much of what you had to say; it is obvious that you havent seen a Queensland golden palm they are absolutely beautiful and very expensive to buy as well. Your attitude is quite parochial and i would suggest that you don't have a very distant horizon in your thinking. What would a spruce, blue or toherwise be doing in the tropics? how would i get such a thing past Australian Quarantine, even if i was silly enough to follow your advice.

Keep up the suggestions though gentlemen. thank you.

Rgds Ian   

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, December 14, 2006 1:12 AM

As it will finally grow to 9 metres I suspect that whilst thro is an option maintaining it  could be troublesome

http://www.desert-tropicals.com/Plants/Arecaceae/Dypsis_lutescens.html

interesting idea of moving it but as has been said neither simple or cheap  

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Virginia Beach
  • 2,150 posts
Posted by tangerine-jack on Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:46 PM

That is a tough problem.  I don't think that going through the tree is a very good option as the growth of the tree with destroy the track in short order.   I think the least problematic solution is to go behind, it will damage the tree a little bit to be sure, but it won't be seen and you will have the track where you want it.

In the big picture cutting a little bit off a tree is not a crime by any means.  We must conserve nature as much as possible, but trees lose limbs all the time and it will recover very quickly.  Ian, trim the tree and lay your track.

The Dixie D Short Line "Lux Lucet In Tenebris Nihil Igitur Mors Est Ad Nos 2001"

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Thursday, December 14, 2006 6:01 PM

Going thru a palm sounds like a sure-fire way to kill it.

Palms are different from regular trees. Their trunk system is very different from a tree. Go in front, back or around, but not directly thru it. Trimming a little of the outside of the trunk sounds like the least damaging way to do it if your left no other option. I would consult someone familiar with palms first.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, December 14, 2006 6:13 PM

Jack, Dave and Vic.

Thank you for your offerings but all of your assumptions may not be correct, Dont forget it has about 20 trunks as such and about 4 of them are serious ones. I don't think it will get much taller than it is though, it doesn't seem to get much taller at all really.

Tropical plants have huge recovery powers and i have actually put a gouge in some other trunks elsewhere on my layout to about halfway through with no discernable effect.

The old track used to go behind this tree but i am trying to straighten the track out and going right through the middle will only effect about 4 trunks and the lesser of the 4 serious trunks. Queensland golden palms do not have boughs more fronds.

How about some one vollenteering to post a few pictures for me? all will become clearer then.

Thnks evryone

ian

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, December 14, 2006 6:48 PM
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Slower Lower Delaware
  • 1,266 posts
Posted by Capt Bob Johnson on Thursday, December 14, 2006 7:13 PM

Ian, there is another option you apparently haven't considered.   Purchase the property next door, sell or give any structures thereon to anybody who will move them off the property within 90 days, and move your trains there and leave the poor palm tree alone!   You could then even plant a brother or sister nearby for it to commiserate with.

Think of the broad sweeping curves and long straightaways you could have.   You could get big new engines and run loooooong trains.   Paradise within paradise!

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 15, 2006 9:48 AM
Ian just look in your tele book for a Arborist in your area!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 15, 2006 6:44 PM

Bob mate unfortunately i can't buy the property next door, it is an expensive street that has been streetscaped and hardly anyone i know would be able to afford to buy it even if they could.

Unfortunately i cannot leave the tree alone, i must overcome this problem to go on with my project.

William your idea is a good one but i must damage the tree somehow to go on with what i am doing and i want to minmimise that.

Rgds ian

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Pisa, IT
  • 1,474 posts
Posted by RR Redneck on Friday, December 15, 2006 6:48 PM

 GearDrivenSteam wrote:
Trees can be moved.

True, but I prefer to take the easy route.

Lionel collector, stuck in an N scaler's modelling space.

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: North, San Diego Co., CA
  • 3,092 posts
Posted by ttrigg on Saturday, December 16, 2006 2:28 PM
Ian:
From what I've been reading you have four (4) solutions to your problem.

1.  Remove the tree: Not an option! (end of this option)
2.  Lay track in front of tree.  Visually poor option, too close to existing track!
3.  Lay track behind the tree:  Viable option; but WILL NOT  solve the desired track correction (to straighten out the section)
4.  Slice through the tree trunk(s) as needed to achieve the course correction desired. Will cause short term trauma to tree, will require periodic maintenance to maintain the required clearance.

I say "break out the chain saw and go down the middle"

Tom Trigg

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Pisa, IT
  • 1,474 posts
Posted by RR Redneck on Saturday, December 16, 2006 6:39 PM

 ttrigg wrote:
Ian:
From what I've been reading you have four (4) solutions to your problem.

1.  Remove the tree: Not an option! (end of this option)
2.  Lay track in front of tree.  Visually poor option, too close to existing track!
3.  Lay track behind the tree:  Viable option; but WILL NOT  solve the desired track correction (to straighten out the section)
4.  Slice through the tree trunk(s) as needed to achieve the course correction desired. Will cause short term trauma to tree, will require periodic maintenance to maintain the required clearance.

I say "break out the chain saw and go down the middle"

I'll start er up!

Lionel collector, stuck in an N scaler's modelling space.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 16, 2006 8:37 PM
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Pisa, IT
  • 1,474 posts
Posted by RR Redneck on Saturday, December 16, 2006 10:37 PM
That'll get er done.

Lionel collector, stuck in an N scaler's modelling space.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 17, 2006 6:19 PM

My princicple with my railway has always been to make it fit the lay of the land and not the opposite, so i have no intention of bulldozing the lot nor am i going to do anything toward making major changes to the flora or anything else. Don't forget this is a very expensive architect designed house with an equally expensive architect desingned tropical garden. The railway lives in it not the other way round.

Incidentally of interest to drinkers, this area is a white tiled outdoor bar area, complete with a bar, comfortable raised bar chairs and shade. The railway is part of the scenery and maintaining a tropical look with palms and ferns is of paramount inportance. New ideas have emerged now about running a stream through this area 1 as well.

So forget about silly ideas such as removing the tree using a bulldozer or anything like that.

Rgds ian

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Blackpool, Lancashire, UK
  • 448 posts
Posted by kimbrit on Monday, December 18, 2006 2:23 AM

Ian, any chance of a pic yet? You used to post pics on the old forum, using the tree symbol is just the same as then.

Kim

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: North, San Diego Co., CA
  • 3,092 posts
Posted by ttrigg on Monday, December 18, 2006 5:02 PM

 

Whoa!!!!!!

Ian only wants to cut a hole in the tree, not remove the entire township!!!!!!!!!!! 

Back that beast up a tad!!!! 

Tom Trigg

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Pisa, IT
  • 1,474 posts
Posted by RR Redneck on Monday, December 18, 2006 6:54 PM
Seriously though, it sounds to me like that is your only option unless you completely redo the railroad, and yes pictures would be nice to help assess the situation.

Lionel collector, stuck in an N scaler's modelling space.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:50 PM

I have got photos of  the tree, but Doreen hads tried to post them for me but it hasn't worked. In the past i used to send them to Troy and he would post them for me.

Whoever suggested redoing the railway, this is actually what i am doing and i must go down this path. The track used to go behind the tree and i can still run it behind the tree but i am trying to straighten it out, (the track that is).

Palm trees in the tropics grow very quickly and are quite hard to kill or even hurt, so even if i take a quarter of the tree away, it will not suffer or look unduly damaged.

Rgds ian

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Garden Railways magazine. Please view our privacy policy