EMPIRE II LINE wrote: So is it feasible to use any of the popular DCC sytems that are being used for the smaller scales, like N, or HO. On a really huge "G" scale layout ?? Does it work ?? That is, does it get the signal through out the whole layout ??Byron
So is it feasible to use any of the popular DCC sytems that are being used for the smaller scales, like N, or HO. On a really huge "G" scale layout ?? Does it work ?? That is, does it get the signal through out the whole layout ??
Byron
Byron: I just finished reading a magazine put out by MR. It cost me $14.99 and is about 25 pages thick. The pages are thick, too. It covers DCC for beginners. I figured, after a year of trying to decipher DCC & R/C DCC, I trekked to the closest hobby shop, a mere 25 miles or so away. The guy wouldn't talk to me, kept repeating, "Buy the books and read them." So, WTH, I did.
To directly answer your question: I have no experience along the lines you're inquiring about. But, I did read where power boosters are advised for larger layouts. I assume you know this but posted in case you didn't. It seems the 'control center' or whatever they call the encoder part, puts out a rather puny signal, and it needs to be amplified, hence the boosters. It suggests dividing a big layout into 'zones' or suchlike, with a dedicated booster to each zone. Since my layout will be comparatively tiny, I didn't pay a lot of attention.
You may be aware already that track itself can act like an antenna for all sorts of stray electrical emissions. I don't know why someone hasn't whipped up a tuned bypass filter and put it on the market. Perhaps they're on the decoder module, the mag took care not to burden the reader with a lot of technical facts. Thus, the signal the onboard decoder sees is 'noisy'. And if boosters aren't used, according to the mag, the signal strength, due to resistive and other losses in the track, falls too low to be reliable.
Hope this helps.
Les W.
I read in several of the replys about conductive greese.
I picked up several tubes of copper color conductive greese in my loco big box store. I read the label about its benefits and warnings. After using it on all of my rail joints.
I took a OHM meter and stuck the probes into the greese in the tube. I got a "INF" reading.
You would do better purchasing a tube of "NEVER SEZE" from the auto parts store. It will not wash away with the rain.
I posted solutions previously that really I got from raymond at http://www.rayman4449dynip.com/. The biggest solution came from connecting a correct bulb that draws enough to clean up the track signal to allow the engines to transpond. Track connections were a lower but important problem after once the signal made it to the track. I also had to modify antennas on the mth to get rid of out of range error messages!
from an O gauge post:
As we all know, wiring a bulb across the output of the TIU (or alternatively, across the input to a barrier strip) can significantly enhance a DCS signal. I became curious as to what would be the best bulb to use. So I ran a series of tests looking at the DCS signal for a variety of bulbs. The test set up is as follows:Layout, 2 rail DCS, with the TMCC signal activeLocos are two Atlas RSD-7s, running in a lashup. Both have been converted to DCS15 scale mph speed3 minute lap timeTrain goes through eight blocks, which are distributed to two TIU channelsEach channel powered by a Lionel ZW running at 18 V nominalThe bulbs are located at the input to the barrier stripThe same type of bulb is used in each channelI confined the tests to bulbs that have a standard bayonet base to make them compatible with my systemI recorded the track signal every time a new one appeared on the hand held. I recorded all the error messages as a zero. Typically I took 130 -150 readings in one circuit. I averaged the readings and calculated the standard deviation to get some idea of how much the signal varied. Results are: Bulb Type: NoneTrack Signal Average 1.5Standard Deviation +/- .86Bulb Type: 1445 (14.4 V, .13 Amps, 2000 hours)Track Signal Average 5.70Standard Deviation +/- 1.73Bulb Type: 363 (14 V, 0.20 Amps, 250 hours)Track Signal Average 7.49Standard Deviation +/- 1.70Bulb Type: 1893 (14 V, 0.33 Amps, 7500 hours)Track Signal 7.94Standard Deviation +/- 1.35Bulb Type: 1826 (18 V, .15 Amps, 250 hours)Track Signal Average 4.69Standard Deviation +/- 1.96Bulb Type: 1818 (24 V, .17 Amps, 250 hours)Track Signal Average 4.59Standard Deviation +/- 1.19Obviously any bulbs helps. I would have really liked the 1818 Bulb to be good, because that is a 24 V bulb and hence would last longer running on my 18 V. But as you can see I got not only the highest track signal, but also the lowest relative standard deviation with the1893 bulb.Incidentally, you can get all these bulbs from http://www.interlight.biz/ Just plug in the bulb number in the search box in the upper left hand corner
I hope this worked for him and anyone else encountering this set of problems. Ask me anything else I can help you with. Joe at jwpcfv@msn.com. I'll be signing off for good soon cause I lost my job and running out of cash fast!
My mainline is 234 feet, 8 inches. There are 12 turnouts. There is an additional 198 feet of sidings and branch line. That is approaching 500 feet total track.
I'm using DCC (Digitrax command station) I have close to 80 mobile decoders including Digitrax, LGB, Lenz, TCS, Phoenix, Soundtrax and NCE. There are 76 stationary decoders for lights, turnouts, signals , etc.
All the rail is currently LGB brass, all joiners are split jaw, no grease used in the joiners. There is currently a single 8 guage duplex feeder from each booster to the rails. I typically have 10 trains on the rails, and run as many as 7 at one time. That includes 12 lighted passenger cars and 8 lighted cabooses.
My layout has been in operation using DCC for over 7 years. I have had no problems at all getting the DCC signal to any part of the railroad.
I'm a little confused about your mixing the term "DCS" and "DCC" Are you asking about anyone getting DCS to run outside on a larger railroad? Or trying to decide if you should switch to DCC?
DCS and DCC are two entirely different things.
DCS is a small control signal that is superimposed on top of either AC or DC track voltage. The control signal is quite small.
Think of DCS as a river. The constant flow of water propels boats or turns waterwheels at mills along the river. The boats and mills are powered by the flow of water. You could sent signals to the boat captains, or the mill operators by slapping you hand on the top of the river to make waves. The captains and operators would have to watch the surface of the water to see your signals. The farther up or down river they are, the harder it will be for them to see your signals. If the river branches, the signals will be even harder for them to see.
DCC is a large control signal. There is no ac or dc on the rails at all! Just the DCC signal. The DCC signal itself can a light a bulb, or run a motor.
Think of DCC as a river with no flowing water. There is a dam with a big gate. The gate opens and closes constantly to form a signal. Opening and closing it rapidly represents a 1. Opening and closing it slowly represents a 0. As a result, the water in the river flows, stops, flows, stops etc. The length of the flows and stops is used to signal the captains and mill operators along the river. Even if the river splits, each branch still flows and stops.
On a DCC system, the signal is so strong that it will run motors, and lights. The decoder decides, based on the messages it gets from the signal how to apply the signal to the motor and lights.
On DCC, the signal IS the power. If you want to check to see if a bad joiner is cutting off the DCC signal, put a Light bulb across the rails. If it lights, then you have a DCC signal. In reality, a DCC decoder should never have a problem seeing the data sent to it. That is, at least not until the signal becomes so weak that the decoder can not extract enough POWER from the signal to operate.
B0B
stanames wrote: Yes lots of experience with DCC, no experience with DCS (DCS is not DCC). http://www.tttrains.com/sjrpI tend to ovekill things with a bus line and feeders and do not rely much on rail joiners. Stan
Yes lots of experience with DCC, no experience with DCS (DCS is not DCC). http://www.tttrains.com/sjrp
I tend to ovekill things with a bus line and feeders and do not rely much on rail joiners.
Stan
So Stan,
Where are you located, are you using brass track, who's brand track do you use, or do you make your own, and how long is your mainline track ?
Do you have a lot of switches in your layout, and who's DCC system are you using ?
OH, Last off how long has your line been in operation ?
Any info is appriciated....Byron
PS: DCS- Digital Command System is similar to DCC- Digital Command Control, I think....
And also TOAD, is it BILL,
I'm going to definitely do the conductive grease thing, but for now, I'll wait till this heat breaks, their talk'in 95 with heat index of 103 today.
Just did finish mowing and trimming yard again, early this morn'in, every 8 ta 10 days this time'a year, and also pressure washed some used awnings, I'm gonna put'em up over 4 of my windows, including 2 over the windows in the train room, gott'a try an keep some'o the sun out.
All the advice everyones giving is certainly appriciated, much of it will be implemented....
EMPIRE II LINE wrote: So does anyone out here have any real LARGE SCALE experience with a DCC type set up and how well it performs on a really large mainline, say 500 foot or more in length, one that also has a lot of power/signal loosing switches in it's overall design.
So does anyone out here have any real LARGE SCALE experience with a DCC type set up and how well it performs on a really large mainline, say 500 foot or more in length, one that also has a lot of power/signal loosing switches in it's overall design.
Age is only a state of mind, keep the mind active and enjoy life
Robert,
Bigger lines just require bigger ideas and power sometimes. Now that the manufacturers are starting to think beyond narrow gauge only. Ever since I had my first Lionel in 1951 the Santa Fe Chief passenger set, I've always loved the magnificence of the streamliner era, and the transition from the huge steamers to diesel era. That's what I grew up in, a busy city, lots of train activity, Akron, Ohio---Rubber City, you know.....And the Great Northern RR has a colorful history as well as Paint Scheme......OK.....Maybe Just a little bragging though !!!!
And Sean,
Yes, please do keep us updated, anything new, and an understanding of how it seems to work best, OK, best for you, is always appriciated.
Byron,
I don't have the "real world" experience, yet, but I'm in the similar boat you are... I'm putting down a parallel mainline with 250' of track on each line (little over 500' total, plus some spurs, switchyard, etc) I've purchased the NCE PowerCab Pro (Wireless) 10A system (separate cab and booster) and a power supply, and am having my LHS finish up four decoder installations (I'm swamped at work right now, so it's that or let them sit for a couple weeks )-- I'm hopeful I'll have trains on the 40' of track I have laid by week's end...
I'm doing SplitJaw with conductive paste on Brass code 332 -- a mix of Aristo and LGB. I spoke to an engineer from NCE at length, and they do recommend power drops to the track every 20-30 feet, at minimum, on a large layout. We'll see how that works out. I'm currently wiring for three "power districts" on the mainline -- two for the main loop, and one for the switch-yard / passing siding. I'll run it on one booster initially, since I'm months away from having the full line finished.
I'll keep posting to let you know how it goes, if you'd like.
--Sean--
With this DCS system that only seems to confuse the signal, the fewer leads the better, so everyone who uses it says...
My main thread here is, has anyone been able to incorporate the use of any of the popular DCC systems successfully on a really long mainline "G" scale layout ??
So does anyone out here have any real LARGE SCALE experience with a DCC type set up and how well it performs on a really large mainline, say 500 foot or more in length, one that also has a lot of power/signal loosing switches in it's overall design. That is where I am having the problem with getting the signal from MTH's DCS (Digital Comand System) signal to go through. Even with using all "Split-Jaw" rail clamps in the layout. Mind you soldering jumpers is out, I use the Aristo stainless steel track.
I've recently been communicating with a gent in south Florida, who says he is coating all of his clamps and track ends with electrical conductive grease before assembly, as yet he has not run a train on any of the layout. I'm curious to hear if that helps conduct the signal any better or not, as he is using the same basic power set up as I presently am.
Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month