watch?v=Ym5y6J9kuW0
Charlie a.k.a. MichiganRailRoad714 (Charter Member TTC)
Ryan get use to it. he's not going anywhere by the look on his face, hes there to stay. You got a good companion there by the looks of it. He will not forget how you helped him in his time of need.
Well I picked up a PRR interurban set with tmcc by K-Line befor Lionel obtain it so this doesn't have the detail seats and all but it does have TMCC and railsounds which the other doesn't( it might have railsounds but not tmcc) any way that will be on its way to me. ( Hmm what do I tell you know who about this one lol) Oh well she'll get over it.
To me the switches ( super O) are expensive all I can find are the ones that are about $100 each. Don't have plans for switching anyway with it lol.
Not much else going on getting ready as work tomorrow
Life's hard, even harder if your stupid John Wayne
http://rtssite.shutterfly.com/
I learn something new every day. I was under the impression of just the opposite on Super O stuff
Any way, a picture of the soon to be no more layout:
Look what I found in an MTH bridge box:
Ryan
Yes ... back to photos. This is SPF!
OK, back to pictures...
Once again I have been "multilating" my Flyer 355. It never ran well on the 2% grades on my current layout. Lots of wheel-slip trying to pull even a single car up the hill. So last weekend I fabricated a small "fuel tank" out of sheet brass and filled it with lead fishing weight. I glued a couple of plastic tubes to the sides, in replacement of the simulated air tanks on the original.
In all I probably only increased the weight of the locomotive by a couple of ounces, but I am happy to say it can now at least pull 3 cars up the hill.
I have figured out what is wrong with my brain! On the left side nothing works right, and on the right side there is nothing left!
Super O remote and manual switches cost less than Fastrack equivalents.
Rob
Rob not sure about bending Super O as had one piece that I got in with a large lot that someone tried to bend I think ( Don't know why you would want to bend a curve tighter than it is ) but the kinked the day lights out of it. But yes Super O is very plentiful the only thing I see is the electric switches are $$ but You still can get the conversion pieces to convert an O gauge switch to be used with super O.
Zero Export...I though you were doing the whole thing in super o, and I couldnt figure out why some one would want to use such a hard to find track system...
Easy to find and very plentiful, a LOT less expensive than FasTrack, and can be custom bent to any radius. Super O is the best!
LOOKING GOOD every one
RT, like i said, I though you were doing the whole thing in super o, and I couldnt figure out why some one would want to use such a hard to find track system.
But I answered my own question
Have a good Sunday
Here's something from my old layout :
The local Mopar Club hanging out at the Diner.
CNJ Beep meeting up with the Pennsy Flyer
I am the monster in your head...And I thought you'd learn by now, It seems you haven't yet.I am the venom in your skin --- Breaking Benjamin
Well I got most of my landscaping supplies so I will be taking all of the track off of the addition to start on that. I will replace the 1/2 042" curve so I can still run the trains as they were before the table expansion.
I don't have anything new to add but here is a shot of one of the Hobos catching a free ride.
A shot of the Dockside when it still ran.
And some action in the yard.
Have a nice Sunday.
Joined 1-21-2011 TCA 13-68614
Kev, From The North Bluff Above Marseilles IL.
I happen to get this post war train set which turned out to be 2571W from 1961 The Fort Knox set it was missing a couple of cars which I obtain real easy and it came with super O track and a LW transformer so now all I'm missing is a box for the fort knox gold car and a set box other wise have the whole set. So decided to do a loop in super O and run the set there probably add a couple other post war cars to it as the loop will have room as I'm thinking the loop will be like 5' by 12'
RT, if I may ask, and maybe I missed it some where, why super o? There's so many other readily available track systems available....
I am just curious. I am not in any way saying it was a bad idea. Just wondering...
EDIT : I just read the WHOLE post...... I thought you where doing the whole layout in Super O and trying to jerry rig GarGraves in between it...... I am tired........
Close look there not identical and all lionel had to say there where trying to make realistic track and don't be to sure about it never being made again theres arguments about the molds and if I remember right there was a guy making some about 10 years ago but it wasn't exact but real close.
I guess Lionel is lucky that Eldyn(Graves) & Earle(Gardner) did not sue them over the design. Oh well, there will never be any Super O made again, & GarGraves is still going strong.
Hey all guess will try and start this one. Never concidered it as didn't have any but look how close Gargraves track is to Super O track
By the way the most inside track is super O the other 3 are gargraves.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month