Trains.com

Sunday Photo Fun 04/14/2013

2699 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: South Carolina
  • 9,713 posts
Sunday Photo Fun 04/14/2013
Posted by rtraincollector on Saturday, April 13, 2013 6:57 PM

 Hey all guess will try and start this one. Never concidered it as didn't have any but look how close Gargraves track is to Super O track

 

By the way the most inside track is super O the other 3 are gargraves.   

Life's hard, even harder if your stupid  John Wayne

http://rtssite.shutterfly.com/

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hopewell, NY
  • 3,230 posts
Posted by ADCX Rob on Saturday, April 13, 2013 7:25 PM

I guess Lionel is lucky that Eldyn(Graves) & Earle(Gardner) did not sue them over the design.  Oh well, there will never be any Super O made again, & GarGraves is still going strong.

Rob

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: South Carolina
  • 9,713 posts
Posted by rtraincollector on Saturday, April 13, 2013 7:47 PM

Close look there not identical and all lionel had to say there where trying to make realistic track and don't be to sure about it never being made again theres arguments about the molds and if I remember right there was a guy making some about 10 years ago but it wasn't exact but real close.

Life's hard, even harder if your stupid  John Wayne

http://rtssite.shutterfly.com/

  • Member since
    March 2013
  • 166 posts
Posted by Zero Export on Saturday, April 13, 2013 8:15 PM

RT, if I may ask, and maybe I missed it some where, why super o? There's so many other readily available track systems available....

I am just curious. I am not in any way saying it was a bad idea. Just wondering...

Ryan

EDIT : I just read the WHOLE post......   I thought you where doing the whole layout in Super O and trying to jerry rig GarGraves in between it......  I am tired........Sleep

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: South Carolina
  • 9,713 posts
Posted by rtraincollector on Saturday, April 13, 2013 8:48 PM

I happen to get this post war train set which turned out to be 2571W from 1961 The Fort Knox set it was missing a couple of cars which I obtain real easy and it came with super O track and a LW transformer so now all I'm missing is a box for the fort knox gold car and a set box other wise have the whole set. So decided to do a loop in super O and run the set there probably add a couple other post war cars to it as the loop will have room as I'm thinking the loop will be like 5' by 12'

Life's hard, even harder if your stupid  John Wayne

http://rtssite.shutterfly.com/

KRM
  • Member since
    January 2011
  • From: North Bluff above Marseilles IL
  • 6,506 posts
Posted by KRM on Sunday, April 14, 2013 11:36 AM

Well I got most of my landscaping supplies so I will be taking all of the track off of the addition to start on that. I will replace the 1/2 042" curve so I can still run the trains as they were before the table expansion.

I don't have anything new to add but here is a shot of one of the Hobos catching a free ride. Smile


A shot of the Dockside when it still ran. Laugh

And some action in the yard. 

Have a nice Sunday.

 

Joined 1-21-2011    TCA 13-68614

Kev, From The North Bluff Above Marseilles IL. Whistling

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Hightstown, NJ
  • 2,886 posts
Posted by anjdevil2 on Sunday, April 14, 2013 11:49 AM

Here's something from my old layout :

The local Mopar Club hanging out at the Diner.

CNJ Beep meeting up with the Pennsy Flyer

I am the monster in your head...And I thought you'd learn by now, It seems you haven't yet.
I am the venom in your skin  --- Breaking Benjamin


  • Member since
    March 2013
  • 166 posts
Posted by Zero Export on Sunday, April 14, 2013 11:56 AM

LOOKING GOOD every one

RT, like i said, I though you were doing the whole thing in super o, and I couldnt figure out why some one would want to use such a hard to find track system. 

But I answered my own question

Have a good Sunday

Ryan

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hopewell, NY
  • 3,230 posts
Posted by ADCX Rob on Sunday, April 14, 2013 12:19 PM

Zero Export
...I though you were doing the whole thing in super o, and I couldnt figure out why some one would want to use such a hard to find track system...

Easy to find and very plentiful, a LOT less expensive than FasTrack, and can be custom bent to any radius.  Super O is the best!

Rob

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: South Carolina
  • 9,713 posts
Posted by rtraincollector on Sunday, April 14, 2013 12:44 PM

Rob not sure about bending Super O as had one piece that I got in with a large lot that someone tried to bend I think ( Don't know why you would want to bend a curve tighter than it is ) but the kinked the day lights out of it. But yes Super O is very plentiful the only thing I see is the electric switches are $$ but You still can get the conversion pieces to convert an O gauge switch to be used with super O.

Life's hard, even harder if your stupid  John Wayne

http://rtssite.shutterfly.com/

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hopewell, NY
  • 3,230 posts
Posted by ADCX Rob on Sunday, April 14, 2013 1:45 PM

Super O remote and manual switches cost less than Fastrack equivalents.

Rob

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,207 posts
Posted by stebbycentral on Sunday, April 14, 2013 2:04 PM

OK, back to pictures...

Once again I have been "multilating" my Flyer 355.  It never ran well on the 2% grades on my current layout.  Lots of wheel-slip trying to pull even a single car up the hill.  So last weekend I fabricated a small "fuel tank" out of sheet brass and filled it with lead fishing weight.  I glued a couple of plastic tubes to the sides, in replacement of the simulated air tanks on the original. 

In all I probably only increased the weight of the locomotive by a couple of ounces, but I am happy to say it can now at least pull 3 cars up the hill.

I have figured out what is wrong with my brain!  On the left side nothing works right, and on the right side there is nothing left!

  • Member since
    January 2011
  • From: ___ _, ____
  • 323 posts
Posted by srguy on Sunday, April 14, 2013 4:37 PM

Yes ... back to photos. This is SPF!

[/URL]
  • Member since
    March 2013
  • 166 posts
Posted by Zero Export on Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:57 PM

I learn something new every day. I was under the impression of just the opposite on Super O stuff

Any way, a picture of the soon to be no more layout:

Look what I found in an MTH bridge box:

Ryan

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: South Carolina
  • 9,713 posts
Posted by rtraincollector on Sunday, April 14, 2013 7:10 PM

Ryan get use to it. he's not going anywhere by the look on his face, hes there to stay. You got a good companion there by the looks of it. He will not forget how you helped him in his time of need.

Well I picked up a PRR interurban set with tmcc by K-Line befor Lionel obtain it so this doesn't have the detail seats and all but it does have TMCC and railsounds which the other doesn't( it might have railsounds but not tmcc) any way that will be on its way to me. ( Hmm what do I tell you know who about this one lol) Oh well she'll get over it.

To me the switches ( super O) are expensive all I can find are the ones that are about $100 each. Don't have plans for switching anyway with it lol.

Not much else going on getting ready as work tomorrow

Life's hard, even harder if your stupid  John Wayne

http://rtssite.shutterfly.com/

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: SE MI
  • 915 posts
Posted by MichRR714 on Sunday, April 14, 2013 7:26 PM

Charlie a.k.a. MichiganRailRoad714 (Charter Member TTC)      

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month