Trains.com

TCA Dues now $50.00. What will be the impact? Locked

8379 views
44 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2007
  • From: Glendora, Calif.
  • 2,672 posts
Posted by SPMan on Saturday, April 12, 2014 5:54 PM

I have reached the age where I am no longer required to pay National Dues but I do send donations when asked.  I attended maybe 6 or 8 York shows during my working years and thought the dues were well worth it then.  I am no longer able to travel and I doubt I will ever go to York again but I hope the organization will continue.  I get very little from TCA local now but I still pay local dues.  Sometimes I wonder why but I guess you can call it pay back for all the good times I had at TCA.

Ray

 

SPMan

              

 

              

 

              

 

              

 

              

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hopewell, NY
  • 3,230 posts
Posted by ADCX Rob on Saturday, April 12, 2014 10:13 PM

SPMan

I have reached the age where I am no longer required to pay National Dues but I do send donations when asked.

Thank you.

Rob

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • 8,050 posts
Posted by fifedog on Sunday, April 13, 2014 6:53 AM

Just wondering how much coin was lost during the TCA museum's battle with Lancaster County over its septic system...?

I'm staying.  But I do understand why some won't.

Perhaps an incremental increase would have lessened the blow...

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • 1,786 posts
Posted by cwburfle on Sunday, April 13, 2014 7:16 AM

Just wondering how much coin was lost during the TCA museum's battle with Lancaster County over its septic system...?

 

I guess the replacement / upgraded septic system cost the TCA a pretty penny. They didn't have a choice on whether the work would be done,

Once again, the increase was fifteen dollars. That might cover lunch at a fast food place for my younger son and I.

Belonging to the TCA is certainly worth the cost of dues to me, regardless of whether I attend York.

  • Member since
    April 2014
  • 120 posts
Posted by dlagrua on Sunday, April 13, 2014 8:33 AM
The simple law of economics dictates that as prices go up revenues go down. The range of opinions on this thread goes from price gouging to "I will pay anything that the TCA asks". OK fair enough! The end always justifies the means. The membership numbers and revenue will tell the story a year down the line but consider, for every members who passively submits to the exorbitant 40% increase there may be another who resists. If this proves true, fill in the blanks.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hopewell, NY
  • 3,230 posts
Posted by ADCX Rob on Sunday, April 13, 2014 9:57 AM

I like your idea, but if the fee was lowered to $21 instead, would that cause a corresponding surge in the membership? Could the TCA cover the expenses at this level? Where is the tipping point?

Rob

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • 1,786 posts
Posted by cwburfle on Sunday, April 13, 2014 1:05 PM

 The range of opinions on this thread goes from price gouging to "I will pay anything that the TCA asks".

 

I don't think anyone posted that "I will pay anything that the TCA asks".

Fifteen dollars won't cover the admission to a movie with a trip to the snack bar for one person.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Sunday, April 13, 2014 2:28 PM

"The simple law of economics dictates that as prices go up revenues go down."  I think that this may be a misunderstanding of the Law of Demand, which, to quote Wikipedia, is, "...as the price of a product increases, quantity demanded falls...".  For example, if I had sold hamburgers for a nickel apiece and now double my price to a dime, my sales will fall, but not significantly; so I will take in almost twice the revenue.

"The end always justifies the means" is the principle of consequentialism, which most Judeo-Christian sects condemn, in favor of deontology, or rule-based morality.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Florida
  • 2,238 posts
Posted by traindaddy1 on Sunday, April 13, 2014 8:10 PM
I noticed that SPMan and ADCX Rob posted that they have reached the age that allows them to pass on the dues. What is the age and does it apply to everyone ie new members as well as current members? Thanks.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hopewell, NY
  • 3,230 posts
Posted by ADCX Rob on Sunday, April 13, 2014 8:30 PM

Sorry to infer that, but I'm a dues paying member.

Rob

  • Member since
    October 2013
  • 5 posts
Posted by eastonlionel on Monday, April 14, 2014 6:55 AM

I agree with others that have said the issue is value.  I jointed TCA and LCCA in the late 1990s.  I dropped membership in TCA about 5 or more years ago because I was getting little value out of the dues I was paying, whereas, I was getting value from my LCCA membership.  I don't go to swap meets of either organization because there are none in my area, and I don't travel long distances just to go to a show.  So, the value I was seeking was mostly the magazines and buy/sell publications.  I re-joined TCA last year (at $50) to see if things had changed.  So far not!  The magazine is ok, but so much is dedicated to obscure, pre-war trains.  This is clearly for the over-70 crowd.  And, I was shocked at how few actual listings are in the TCA buy/sell publication.  In fact, it appears to be 80% advertisements selling products or promoting conventions and 20% actual member listings.  Here again the LCCA publication provides more value.  And then there is the website, which is abysmal.  It is confusing and hard to navigate.  I find it nearly impossible to do a successful search on the Interchange track, or maybe there just isn't much listed there?  The LCCA has kept up with the "internet" age with their website, where the TCA is just falling further and further behind.  I find LCCA is really being agressive at keeping up with "modern day" members and their needs.  In fact LCCA just announced a $25 annual membership where you get everything electronically rather than on paper.  I'll be signing up for that.

The fact is, TCA is overpriced, I can only assume because members are supporting a Toy Train Museum (which I will never visit) and the York shows.  It seems to me that TCA is still living in a bygone era, while other clubs are "keeping up with the times."

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • 1,786 posts
Posted by cwburfle on Monday, April 14, 2014 8:43 AM

I agree that the Toy Train Museum and library is probably at the root of the TCA's high expenses, and have posted on multiple occasions that the TCA needs to find a way to make them revenue neutral or close them. Maybe corporate sponsorship,

I don't see why folks who do not get value from the TCA would belong.
The tangible benefits I get from the TCA are its quarterly magazine, insurance program, and trading mediation.
I like to attend York, but I do not go every time.
I expect to maintain my membership long after I stop going to the meet.

I guess the comparisons to the LCCA are inevitable.
I belonged to the LCCA many years ago, and recently rejoined for a couple of years.
My LCCA membership was of no value to me.
I never purchased any of their custom runs.
I did purchase a couple of their Lionel closeouts, but generally their closeout prices were higher than some other sources.,

To each their own.

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • 635 posts
Posted by Nationwidelines on Monday, April 14, 2014 9:19 AM

For all those who think that the TCA general dues support the York meet, you are incorrect.  The York meet is organized and operated by the Eastern Division, which is separate from the National TCA. 

As for the comments of the TCA Quarterly, features articles about "obscure prewar trains" I would disagree.  The fact is the TCA quarterly is one of the few publications that publishes articles on these very interesting trains.  And for the "clearly for the over 70 crowd" also seems a bit off to me.  I am under 50 and collect prewar trains.

I will go on to say that as a collector of trains, after subscribing for 20 years, I dropped CTT several years ago as I found that it was not worth the value to my interests.  I have heard similar comments from fellow collectors about this topic.

The comparison of the TCA to the LCCA as far as offering value, also seems a bit biased.  It may be better for a specific person's tastes, but appears to make the assumption that everyone collects Lionel (or should).  Not everyone does collect Lionel, so the LCCA is not for everyone, nor is the TCA for everyone.  I personally have never even been interested in joining LCCA, as I do not collect Lionel.

I agree that the TCA could do a better job of delivering their information.  As for the expenses of the TCA, I seem to recall that the largest expense is related to the printing and mailings of the TCA Quarterly and TCA newsletter.  I personally think that the TCA needs to modernize and offer electronic versions of these publications.  I am of the belief that maybe a higher or separate fee could be charged to those members that want to receive hard copies of the publications.

As for the advertising in the TCA newsletter, I believe that the revenue from that helps to lower the costs to the TCA members.

The TCA members do support a museum and if you never plan on visiting it or using any of its resources, I am sorry to hear that.  I do not believe that the museum is a perfect institution, but it does display some incredible trains and has a very large library with numerous resources, which I think is a treasure trove of information. 

I personally do not see a large membership drop due to the higher dues.  Rather, I see the membership decline due to a decline in trains in everyday life, as trains are no longer the primary means of transportation like they were in the early 20th century.  Therefore, although children may see toy trains when they are young, they don't see the real trains in their everyday life and trains do not hold their interest throughout life.  Therefore, as the people who grew up with trains being a large part of their lives continue to age and pass away, the membership within the TCA will continue to decline from its peak.  That being said, I do not see the TCA going away either.

NWL

  • Member since
    October 2013
  • 16 posts
Posted by oscar99 on Monday, April 14, 2014 9:58 AM

If I do not have to be a member of the TCA to attend the York meet, why should I be a tca member? The museum and  museum maintence is the problem. The TCA members never voted to have a museum.  

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 2,877 posts
Posted by Bob Keller on Monday, April 14, 2014 10:02 AM

Well folks, I think we've beaten this horse to death. You either see value in TCA membership – or you don't. 

Bob Keller

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month