Trains.com

All Aboard Florida update

13533 views
50 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, March 4, 2016 6:09 PM

Unable to get link to work.

The West Palm Beach AAf station had a construction accident.  What appears to be a casion boring crane was boring and hit a snag.  Caused the crane to tip over but no injuries. 

Any one who has operated know what warning an operator has that a snag is hit ?

EDIT found another link.  Wonder if operator was wearing his seat belt ?

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/news/west-palm-beach-fire-rescue-no-one-injured-in-cran/nqdRy/

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Sunday, February 14, 2016 4:47 PM

AAf is leaning more toward expansion to Jacksonville after going to Orlando.

http://www.metrojacksonville.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=1d4a08189b765f7543c06228773d3b0f&/topic,25868.0.html

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 50 posts
Posted by Brian_Tampa on Saturday, February 13, 2016 10:35 AM

Actually AAF has already built freight bypass tracks around both the WPB and Ft Lauderdale stations. I would assume any future stations would also get a bypass track as well. I am under the impression that freight trains will not run through on the platform tracks. 

Amtrak trains should be able to use the platforms as the height matches the NEC platform height. 

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Saturday, February 13, 2016 8:13 AM

CSSHEGEWISCH
I'm not sure why bridge plates would be needed.  South Shore does quite nicely with gantlet tracks at Hegewisch and other stations.

That is fine if you already have your gantlet tracks in, and have money to keep the switches, their controls, tie-in to PTC, etc. maintained.  I would be interested to see a cost analysis comparing the gantlet alternative for all the stations with putting bridge plate arrangements on the cars 'one time' and then maintaining them.

Failure of one of the bridge plates = send the affected people to another door, or in worst case to another car.  Or schlep a fixed plate from the office, if you know a train with a failed car is due.

Failure to switch a train to the gantlet track = interesting.   Presumably PTC would catch it, and ECP would stop the affected train before any actual contact occurs, and a safe backing move would then be possible.  Presumably also the gantlet switches would never move or split under a moving train, and will always be maintained in good order regardless of weather or power failures.  Presumably there is no situation under which a fast-moving train gets shunted through one of the gantlet switches (and it might, at AAF speeds, be both of them by the time the train stops...) 

Etc.

Frankly, I prefer the bridge plates in this application.  Really prefer them.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, February 13, 2016 6:37 AM

I'm not sure why bridge plates would be needed.  South Shore does quite nicely with gantlet tracks at Hegewisch and other stations.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Saturday, February 13, 2016 5:11 AM

blue streak 1
Subway gap fillers in NYC are platform mounted for curved stations. That is entirely different than car mounted for AAF

But they do the same effective thing, and I am not particularly surprised that the term would be applied to mechanically-actuated bridge-plate solutions. 

On the other hand, when I first read the post, I assumed the bridge plates were on the platform until I read the story.  Yes, it makes more sense to put them on the train, and yes, it makes sense to deploy them the way the Bode solution does.

(And no, I don't think FEC would be happy with a stuck sliding gap filler, or with one that extended into a moving consist, either.  Be interesting to see how -- if at all -- you could arrange platform fillers to 'fail safe' if a locomotive hit them...)

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Saturday, February 13, 2016 3:35 AM

Subway gap fillers in NYC are patform mounted for curved stations.  That is entirely different than car mounted for AAF.  Allows for central maintenance location to fix these beasts.  Don't think FEC would want a plate "H" train goint thru a station with a hung up extender in the way.

 

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Friday, February 12, 2016 11:07 PM

"This is the first time we have seen 'gap filler' used"?

They must not be from New York.

Which is funny because I thought Simmons-Boardman was headquartered in south Manhattan, no more than a few subway stops from, well, you know...

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, February 12, 2016 10:01 PM

Here is AAF's ( Brightline ) solution to having high level platforms on the mainline of FEC which will have plate "H" & "K" cars that would not clear present Amtrak high level platforms.  Hope this retractable plate system will work. 

A consequence of this set up will probably preclude Amtrak ever operating on the FEC ?

http://www.railwayage.com/index.php/passenger/high-performance/retractable-bridge-plates-a-first-for-brightline.html?channel=54

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: East Coast
  • 1,199 posts
Posted by D.Carleton on Thursday, January 28, 2016 10:23 AM

Editor Emeritus, This Week at Amtrak

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:17 PM

blue streak 1

 

Looks like a shell of a viewliner almost.   Now what is going to be interesting to me with this project is how fast......two private companies both experienced with rail passenger service get this from the shop floor onto the rails and any bugs associated with the construction (worked out)............and comparing it to Amtrak's past track record.

In this case real money is on the table vs monopoly money (taxpayer funds).

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Tuesday, January 26, 2016 9:26 PM
  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Sydney Australia
  • 80 posts
Posted by gregrudd on Monday, October 12, 2015 10:42 PM
I wonder if FEC are going to make a video of the construction of the AAF sets like BR did for the HST 125 See plenty of footage on the development of the Paxman Valenta for rail use. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGBQxWwMbIA
Let me reiterate, what I was saying to you previously -Rex Mossop
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Thursday, October 8, 2015 12:22 PM

If it was me deciding on a Siemens Coach for AAF I would pick the two level coach in the brochure below (page 17).......

http://www.mobility.siemens.com/mobility/global/SiteCollectionDocuments/en/rail-solutions/passenger-coaches/viaggio-imagebroschuere-en.pdf

This wasn't hard to find, BTW.    Now I hope I am not dreaming too much here but possibly we can also get the three chime before PA announcements, automated train announcements with digital schedule........ along with multi-linqual announcements in the train stations to be a little more compatible with the rest of the world and a little more civilized than Amtrak?

On the wheelchair discussion I had read on the Midwest HSR Bi-Level specs that there would be a wheelchair elevator on each car to take wheelchair bound passengers up to the second level.    So it does not surprise me if FEC read those specs or attempted to duplicate as much as possible with the design since FEC is also going to need rapid passenger entry and exit........they will also need the dual door arrangement as displayed on the Simens cars on Page 17 on the above link.    The double doors on the first floor is going to limit seating there, so I would expect them to ask for double level cars.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Altadena, CA
  • 340 posts
Posted by 081552 on Wednesday, October 7, 2015 11:12 AM

MikeF90

 Sorry, I was typing with my right thumb on my iPhone yesterday during Gene's presentation. WC = wheelchair.

The All Aboard Florida train cars will have an aisle wide enough for use by a wheelchair user. I'm sure all customers will appreciate the wide aisle! 

 
Deggesty
WC is Wesleyan Chapel--no, the context tells me that it is Wheel Chair.

 

Thanks Johnny, I was thinking something related to the ADA.

Still, 10 feet plus is some wide wheel chair. That must refer to the passenger coach width, Superliners are about the same.

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: San Francisco East Bay
  • 1,360 posts
Posted by MikeF90 on Tuesday, October 6, 2015 6:04 PM

Deggesty
WC is Wesleyan Chapel--no, the context tells me that it is Wheel Chair.

Thanks Johnny, I was thinking something related to the ADA.

Still, 10 feet plus is some wide wheel chair. That must refer to the passenger coach width, Superliners are about the same.

 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Tuesday, October 6, 2015 5:31 PM

WC is Wesleyan Chapel--no, the context tells me that it is Wheel Chair.

Johnny

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: San Francisco East Bay
  • 1,360 posts
Posted by MikeF90 on Tuesday, October 6, 2015 5:25 PM

081552
Trains will be the first totally accessible to WC users. 10' 6" width.


West Coast? Water Closet? Confused How about a decode and a Wikipedia update? TIA!

  • Member since
    December 2012
  • 279 posts
Posted by A McIntosh on Tuesday, October 6, 2015 2:23 PM

Thanks for the site and the info. The only thing that would be neat to see, if it is available, is an artist rendition of a AAF Siemens built train 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, October 6, 2015 8:09 AM

A McIntosh

I wonder when there will be an illustration of what these trains will look like from the inside and outside?

 

Look  at the AAF and Siemens websites.  http://news.usa.siemens.biz/press-release/rail-systems/all-aboard-florida-selects-siemens-train-manufacturer

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2012
  • 279 posts
Posted by A McIntosh on Tuesday, October 6, 2015 7:33 AM

I wonder when there will be an illustration of what these trains will look like from the inside and outside?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Altadena, CA
  • 340 posts
All Aboard Florida update
Posted by 081552 on Monday, October 5, 2015 5:17 PM

Gene Skoropowski, All Aboard Florida just finished his presentation at the APTA conference in SF. The size of the Miami station is amazing. A city in itself. Cummins just shipped the first engine to Seimens for the first Charger locomotive. Train set testing next year. Trains will be the first totally accessible to WC users. 10' 6" width. 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy