Trains.com

"Amtrak is no way to run a railroad"

5043 views
49 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, May 24, 2015 9:14 PM

Jim200

There was also the amendment to stop funding Amtrack by Republican Tom McClintock from central California. 147 Republicans voted with McClintock including some who had long distance trains which served their district. Fortunately, 90 Republicans and 182 Democrats defeated the amendment. Later, McClintock and 45 other Republicans changed their minds and voted for H.R. 749 to fund Amtrak. It is hard for me to understand how they could be for Amtrak funding and against Amtrak funding at the same time. Perhaps, that is what it takes to get elected these days.

 

 

Depending on their districts, they may fear a challenge from the far right, who probably consider Amtrak evil socialism.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, May 26, 2015 6:46 AM

When it comes to the evils of socialism, I've noticed that nobody in the GOP is taking shots at the Tennessee Valley Authority.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Tuesday, May 26, 2015 8:57 AM

CSSHEGEWISCH
When it comes to the evils of socialism, I've noticed that nobody in the GOP is taking shots at the Tennessee Valley Authority.

It's only 'evil' if it doesn't appear to make money or 'pull its own weight'.  Or if it benefits your opponents or something you want to demonize expediently.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, May 26, 2015 9:02 AM

Wizlish

 

 
CSSHEGEWISCH
When it comes to the evils of socialism, I've noticed that nobody in the GOP is taking shots at the Tennessee Valley Authority.

 

It's only 'evil' if it doesn't appear to make money or 'pull its own weight'.  Or if it benefits your opponents or something you want to demonize expediently.

 

Not sure what the GOP pols' views are currently, but their hypocrisy abounded as recently as 2013:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/16/republicans-blast-obama-proposal-to-sell-tennessee-valley-authority/

So where do the so-called 'free market' fans stand on infrastructure?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Tuesday, May 26, 2015 9:36 AM

schlimm
Not sure what the GOP pols' views are currently, but their hypocrisy abounded as recently as 2013:

Hypocrisy about what?  From the story:

"For the first time that I'm aware of, you've got a Democratic administration proposing the sale of TVA and simultaneously you've got significant, conservative federal representatives in the House and Senate defending their local socialist project," Smith said. "There's a lot irony in it and little bit of humor actually."

Meanwhile it's Democrats who point out that debt makes the privatization unpalatable, and that non-power aspects of TVA (including the 'flood control' that was one of the nominal reasons why TVA was formed) would be spun off...

Sing with me: "If buttercups buzzed..."

 

On the other hand, it's pretty easy and technically nonhypocritical to figure this out:  "If it's Obama's idea, it must be BAAA...AAA...AAD!"

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, May 26, 2015 1:53 PM

Wizlish
Hypocrisy about what?

[M-W] Hypocrisy = "behavior that does not agree with what someone claims to believe."

For free market conservatives to vote against the privatization of a government-owned and operated service in an economic sector that is largely private, is a textbook example. 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 1,530 posts
Posted by NKP guy on Tuesday, May 26, 2015 3:02 PM

As a kid I was taught that TVA was a great idea and a great success.  Later I found out that its cheap electricity played a part after 1945 in many northern businesses moving south for the cheaper power and cheaper-yet labor.  Still, I think TVA was a great thing and it's a lasting monument to the New Deal.

So, since it's a successful government agency, how about we let the TVA operate Amtrak?

(By the way, who actually owns and operates the TVA?)

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Tuesday, May 26, 2015 3:34 PM
Excerpt from Fortune magazine, May 25, 1987
When the sale of Conrail was almost complete, some supporters of privatization gathered to celebrate, and Ronald Reagan asked: ''Okay, when do we sell the TVA?'' The faithful looked at their shoes. The President told about a tiff he had had with TVA years ago. Everyone laughed. Then someone changed the subject.
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Tuesday, May 26, 2015 3:40 PM

Kay Bailey Hutchinson was a Texas Republican Senator and she was a staunch Amtrak supporter.     Same with former New Mexico Republican Pete Domenci.  Both Senators actually rode the Amtrak trains in their respective state instead of just viewing them on a post card. 

So I am not sure I would say all Republicans vote against Amtrak instinctively.

There are a few idiots on the Republican side just as there are on the Democrat side (John Murtha International Airport.....really?    How many planes land there?.....How much did that cost?)

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/23/murtha.airport/

I think the concern here across both political parties is that we are spending a LOT and awful LOT of money on "Can't touch this" Social Programs yet seeing meager results if any.   We have Rand Paul running around saying Audit the Fed, Audit the Fed..........You know what?    When are we going to Audit Unemployment programs or Social Security for that matter?

Also, I would like to know what happened to the $8 Billion in Amtrak funding that the House approved earlier this year, that was to stretch to 2020.    Did that not pass the Senate?    What happened to it?

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, May 26, 2015 5:38 PM

It is a federally-owned corporation of your government, the Tennessee Valley Authority, authorized in 1933.  Speaking of Reagan, he was fired by GE (sponsor of the GE Theater, which he hosted on TV) in 1962 in response to his publicly referring to the TVA (TVA being a major customer for GE turbines) as one of the problems of "big government".

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 19 posts
Posted by Rialroad Coal Man on Tuesday, May 26, 2015 6:19 PM

Apparently you don't live in tva service area. I do.   Poor reliability, over staffed and high rates

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, May 26, 2015 9:19 PM

High rates?

In the Chicago area, ComEd charges residential customers 11.57 cents per kWh + a monthly flat fee of $15.95.

By contrast in Knoxville, KUB passes on what they pay TVA per kWh and adds  an additional 25% of that to cover their expenses. So a customer pays 8.965 cents + a $14.00 fee.

TVA states on their own site they charge 8.97 cents per kWh on average through April 2014.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Tuesday, May 26, 2015 10:34 PM

schlimm
TVA states on their own site they charge 8.97 cents per kWh on average through April 2014.

Thats about what we pay in Texas with electrical deregulation, maybe a little less...without the TVA.   We are also the largest Wind Energy producer in the United States.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, May 27, 2015 8:26 AM

"A new analysis shows that people pay 35 percent more for electricity in states that abandoned traditional regulation of monopoly utilities in the 1990s compared with states that stuck with it. Residential customers in the 15 states that embraced wholesale markets paid on average 12.7 cents per kilowatt-hour last year versus 9.4 cents in states with traditional regulation."

 

http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/5/free-market-dogma-has-jacked-up-our-electricity-bills.html

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Wednesday, May 27, 2015 8:46 AM

schlimm

"A new analysis shows that people pay 35 percent more for electricity in states that abandoned traditional regulation of monopoly utilities in the 1990s compared with states that stuck with it. Residential customers in the 15 states that embraced wholesale markets paid on average 12.7 cents per kilowatt-hour last year versus 9.4 cents in states with traditional regulation."

 

http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/5/free-market-dogma-has-jacked-up-our-electricity-bills.html

 

Schlimm, Al-Jezzerra America has an agenda for the United States in how they report the news and it is not a "live happily ever after" agenda.    I would not trust anything they report on......anymore than I would if it was on RT.

In my experience here in Texas we have some of the lowest electrical rates in the country because we have our own grid apart from the rest of the United States and are self-sufficient.

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Wednesday, May 27, 2015 8:58 AM

Off topic but Texas also has it's own stand alone Air Force, Marine Corps, Navy and State Militia.........kind of on the fringe of the structure of the Reserve forces of the Pentagon.   For some strange reason which I will never understand why we are paying for all that as state taxpayers.     However if the President Federalized DoD run Armed Forces the Texas Governor would still have a fairly substantial Armed Forces under his command in manpower.   Not sure about arms or equipment.....that might be lacking.

Goes back to state paranoia about a Fed government takeover of the state I guess.

  • Member since
    October 2012
  • 177 posts
Posted by Jim200 on Wednesday, May 27, 2015 10:10 AM

CMStPnP

 

 
schlimm
TVA states on their own site they charge 8.97 cents per kWh on average through April 2014.

 

Thats about what we pay in Texas with electrical deregulation, maybe a little less...without the TVA.   We are also the largest Wind Energy producer in the United States.

 

Are they still constructing wind farms, or did that stop with the change in federal subsidy? T Boone Pickens was supposed to build the largest wind farm in Texas, maybe 4000 MW. Texas is a great place for wind and solar energy. Amtrak could double track the Texas Eagle route and operate electrically for very little. I understand that the wholesale electric rate sometimes got so low that they paid you to take it. Maybe that  is what TCR high speed rail between Dallas and Houston was thnking. Low operatiñg costs might also sit well with the anti Amtrak Republicans.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, May 27, 2015 11:28 AM

CMStPnP
Schlimm, Al-Jezzerra America has an agenda for the United States in how they report the news and it is not a "live happily ever after" agenda.    I would not trust anything they report on......anymore than I would if it was on RT.

I don't 'trust' Al Jazeera any more than I would than an article on FoxNews.  However, Pulitzer Prize-winning author David Cay Johnson has a long record of excellent journalism and he cites the relevant academic study with links.  He has a strong background in economics, business and tax accounting.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Friday, June 5, 2015 12:08 AM
Excerpt from The Hill, June 4
The House on Thursday rejected a conservative lawmaker’s push to impose steep cuts on Amtrak’s budget a month after a fatal derailment near Philadelphia.
The annual appropriations measure for the Department of Transportation contains $1.13 billion for Amtrak, down from the current $1.4 billion level.
Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) offered two amendments to slash Amtrak funding further. His first proposal, rejected 143-283 with 99 Republicans in opposition, would eliminate all $288.5 million for Amtrak operating grants. The other amendment, defeated 139-286, would strike the entire $850 million allocation for Amtrak capital and debt service grants.
Brooks called on Congress to have the “courage to wean Amtrak from the taxpayer nipple.”
“It is appalling that the federal government undermines and threatens the future of America's children and grandchildren in order to subsidize Amtrak service that would be self-sufficient if riders stopped mooching off of Americans and instead simply paid for the actual cost of their rides,” Brooks said.
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 773 posts
Posted by ruderunner on Friday, June 5, 2015 11:10 AM
From someone who fly's in taxpayer supplied jets...

Modeling the Cleveland and Pittsburgh during the PennCentral era starting on the Cleveland lakefront and ending in Mingo junction

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy