overall wrote: My point was that places like Argintina and Viet Nam can see the value in high speed rail while "leaders" like John McCain would rather please the high way lobby than move HSR ahead in our country. I do think that the more HSR is built in other countries the more it begs the question as to why we don't have it here anywhere except the NEC. It sort of undermines the argument that our country is not populated enough to have HSR doesn't it?George
My point was that places like Argintina and Viet Nam can see the value in high speed rail while "leaders" like John McCain would rather please the high way lobby than move HSR ahead in our country. I do think that the more HSR is built in other countries the more it begs the question as to why we don't have it here anywhere except the NEC. It sort of undermines the argument that our country is not populated enough to have HSR doesn't it?
George
I knew McCain was anti-Amtrak LD trains, but not anti-HSR. Do you have a link to a position paper or article about this?
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
The new line is being built along a corridor that extends from Buenos Aires, Rosario and Cordoba. Does anyone know what the population is there? How does it compare to the NEC or the Chicago to Kansas City corridor mentioned above?
A lot less people live between Chicago and Kansas City than between Boston and Washington and the distances are comparable.
Railway Age News is reporting that Argentina will build a 435 mile high speed rail line using TGV technology. Argentina beats the US to the punch in the western hemisphere building high speed rail. I think that is pathetic.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.