Trains.com

An idea for Amtrak Dining Cars

9850 views
38 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, May 18, 2014 11:34 PM

henry6

/quote] But railroads have long been in the dining car business. Unless all who ever worked in the service are dead or otherwise not available. To say Amtrak doesn't know about dining cars is a wrong statement to say the least.

That statement only exists in your head, I never made it. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Monday, May 19, 2014 3:46 AM
Boy are you touchy. If you look at the whole posting I quoted it was who you quoted that inferred that and you agreed. I quoted the whole post for what it said over all. Or

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, May 19, 2014 11:35 AM

schlimm

henry6
 Therefore dining car fare need not be Delmonico's on wheels. But nor can or nor should be Micky D's.  My "etc." was to include the likes  of Red Lobster and other chains...even regional chains to add spice to the fare.  And I'm not sure Cracker Barrel is the choice either.  I am just throwing out a concept which would have to be market defined, researched and tested then redefined and refined to work.  I do think it has to be better than normal fare, but not gourmet or fine dining by any means. 

Whatever the dining niche ends up being, it should cover the costs of providing.   Amtrak's charter is to provide transport, not be the restaurant on wheels..

Which raises another interesting albeit not controversial point!Smilies  

If the charter is to provide public rail transport, does the charter include high priced business class travel that most of the taxpayers cannot afford and is paid for frequently if not mostly by people traveling on expense accounts?  Or in private rooms that only an average of 14.6 per cent of long distance passengers or 2.2 per cent of system passengers choose?  Presumably their choice is driven in part by several variables, including the ability to pay.  Numbers are from the 2009 - 2013 Amtrak Monthly Operating Reports.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, May 19, 2014 11:40 AM

oltmannd

Overmod

Applebees, T.G. Fridays, Ruby Tuesdays, etc. are known menus and qualities.

 So is Red Lobster

Red Lobster is part of Darden.  So let Darden do it and you have food possibilities from Longhorn, Bonefish, Season's 52, Capitol Grill and Olive Garden, as well.

Getting Darden on board and giving them some profit incentive would likely be good all around.  Amtrak would be small incremental business for them.

You don't want the standard salad that comes with your meal?  $4 gets you a premium salad.  You want a bigger fillet?  Okay, $5  more.  You want creme brulee instead of pie and ice cream....etc.

According to a Wall Street Journal article that appeared last week, I believe, Darden has put Red Lobster up for sale.  

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Tuesday, May 20, 2014 8:02 AM
Sam1

schlimm

henry6
 Therefore dining car fare need not be Delmonico's on wheels. But nor can or nor should be Micky D's.  My "etc." was to include the likes  of Red Lobster and other chains...even regional chains to add spice to the fare.  And I'm not sure Cracker Barrel is the choice either.  I am just throwing out a concept which would have to be market defined, researched and tested then redefined and refined to work.  I do think it has to be better than normal fare, but not gourmet or fine dining by any means. 

Whatever the dining niche ends up being, it should cover the costs of providing.   Amtrak's charter is to provide transport, not be the restaurant on wheels..

Which raises another interesting albeit not controversial point!Smilies  

If the charter is to provide public rail transport, does the charter include high priced business class travel that most of the taxpayers cannot afford and is paid for frequently if not mostly by people traveling on expense accounts?  Or in private rooms that only an average of 14.6 per cent of long distance passengers or 2.2 per cent of system passengers choose?  Presumably their choice is driven in part by several variables, including the ability to pay.  Numbers are from the 2009 - 2013 Amtrak Monthly Operating Reports.

The charter has nothing to do with it, marketing does. Is the train a slouch all stops coach only train or a limited with sleepers for businessmen or whatever. Design your dining car and menu to fit the clientele you are selling the train to. The problem is that Amtrak has to market to Congress and not riders, customers. But some trains can serve subs and potato chips or hamburgers on plastic plates and sloshed down with a Bud or a Coke while others should have steak and on ceramic plates, salad, choice of potato and with a glass of wine. Not everything has to be white collar fare nor blue collar fare but designed for the train and its service. However, whichever is presented has to be just a little bit better, a little more special, more appealing because of the cost involved but not made more costly.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 20, 2014 9:52 AM

henry6
Sam1

schlimm

henry6
 Therefore dining car fare need not be Delmonico's on wheels. But nor can or nor should be Micky D's.  My "etc." was to include the likes  of Red Lobster and other chains...even regional chains to add spice to the fare.  And I'm not sure Cracker Barrel is the choice either.  I am just throwing out a concept which would have to be market defined, researched and tested then redefined and refined to work.  I do think it has to be better than normal fare, but not gourmet or fine dining by any means. 

Whatever the dining niche ends up being, it should cover the costs of providing.   Amtrak's charter is to provide transport, not be the restaurant on wheels..

Which raises another interesting albeit not controversial point!Smilies  

If the charter is to provide public rail transport, does the charter include high priced business class travel that most of the taxpayers cannot afford and is paid for frequently if not mostly by people traveling on expense accounts?  Or in private rooms that only an average of 14.6 per cent of long distance passengers or 2.2 per cent of system passengers choose?  Presumably their choice is driven in part by several variables, including the ability to pay.  Numbers are from the 2009 - 2013 Amtrak Monthly Operating Reports.

The charter has nothing to do with it, marketing does. Is the train a slouch all stops coach only train or a limited with sleepers for businessmen or whatever. Design your dining car and menu to fit the clientele you are selling the train to. The problem is that Amtrak has to market to Congress and not riders, customers. But some trains can serve subs and potato chips or hamburgers on plastic plates and sloshed down with a Bud or a Coke while others should have steak and on ceramic plates, salad, choice of potato and with a glass of wine. Not everything has to be white collar fare nor blue collar fare but designed for the train and its service. However, whichever is presented has to be just a little bit better, a little more special, more appealing because of the cost involved but not made more costly.  

The charter (legislation) has everything to do with it.  If the market had been allowed to work, most passenger rail, especially the long distance trains, would have faded from the scene in 1971 if not before.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, May 20, 2014 10:11 AM

henry6
marketing does. Is the train a slouch all stops coach only train or a limited with sleepers for businessmen or whatever. Design your dining car and menu to fit the clientele you are selling the train to.

henry:  What century is this?   The first principle of marketing is reality.  Businessmen have not been riding LD trains in any numbers for 50 years.  They do ride Acela, which is doing just fine, for transportation, not "dinner in the diner."

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, May 20, 2014 10:29 AM

tAren't long distance trains primarily used for liesure travel?  But still, what works for Acela mealwise should work nationally.   Why not?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Tuesday, May 20, 2014 10:35 AM
schlimm

henry6
marketing does. Is the train a slouch all stops coach only train or a limited with sleepers for businessmen or whatever. Design your dining car and menu to fit the clientele you are selling the train to.

henry:  What century is this?   The first principle of marketing is reality.  Businessmen have not been riding LD trains in any numbers for 50 years.  They do ride Acela, which is doing just fine, for transportation, not "dinner in the diner."

That's right. If you don't have businessmen riding you don't have to offer a higher menu fare...but ACELA and other trains in various corridors have a heavy businessman's business thus the menu has to be better than the all stops clunker of non business clientele. A NE Corridor train, even non Corridor operations in the east have to offer a different menu than in the south, mid and north west and west. The Auto train has to be different than any of them but won't be too different than other east coast Boston-NY Florida trains, etc. We are talking Amtrak and not McAmtrak. Marketing is all important matching itself to the service and service area of the charter. That's the reality.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy