Skokie Swift: Another tree incident with a rail train. One hurt. Note how many trees are along the ROW. Seems like RRs and transit never learn about keeping ROW from probable trees falling on tracks ? As well note third rail vulnerable to getting shorted out by tree.
https://chicago.cbslocal.com/2020/06/09/cta-yellow-line-train-derails-in-skokie-service-suspended
Are the trees growing (and dying) on railroad OWNED property?
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
And don't forget the political power of nature-lovers.
daveklepper And don't forget the political power of nature-lovers.
As opposed to political power of nature-haters?
The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.
Just asking, are these trains autonomous? Isn't the rngineer (or motorman?) supposed to be paying attention to whats in front of their train?
samfp1943Just asking, are these trains autonomous? Isn't the rngineer (or motorman?) supposed to be paying attention to whats in front of their train?
Trains - Freight or Passenger - operating under signal indication, with Clear signals ARE NOT line of sight vehicles.
You gotta watch out for these trees, I'm telling you. Ask Saruman at Isengard what he thinks about them. Or Jesus -- he made a life's work out of mutilating them... but they got their revenge on him in the end. I ask you, can you trust Christ-killing things you can't even reason with?
You are right about railroad trains not being line-of-sight vehicles. That is why signals started in use some 160 years ago. An automotible driver drives on line of sight and is supposed to be able to stop safely no matteer what the emergency. Ditto a streetcaf operator, which is why light rail operqtions today restrict speeds in downtown on=street operations, even if on dedicated lanes. Oveying traffic lights, of course. And then use signals for higher speed safety elsewhere.
The last Third Avenue Elevated had no signals except at interlodkings on its local tracks. CTA jad some simiklar operations, but I believe is completely signalled today. Am I correcdt?
CTA has wayside signals on some routes and locations and cab signalling everywhere else.
samfp1943 Just asking, are these trains autonomous? Isn't the rngineer (or motorman?) supposed to be paying attention to whats in front of their train?
Quoting Overmod:
Hey, Overmod, are not we supposed to steer clear of politics and religion? How dare you use the C___t word!!!!! (But Jesus is OK. Also the name of a Cuban ball-player, if I remember correctly.)
daveklepperHow dare you use the C___t word!!!!!
Interestingly no American denomination pronounces the name correctly. (Which should not be surprising considering they can't pronounce 'thou' correctly either... let alone understand how it is grammatically used.)
None of this addresses faith at all, or is supposed to. Just as the map is not the territory, the name doesn't define the person. The Orthodox do this in a slightly different manner by never naming the Eternal, even in print; in my opinion we can kid a bit about the carpenter part without, well, the other.
More specifically, thinking about it a bit, I did not intend to reference any other religious groups 'historically reviled' for you-know-what. I will happily take that reference out if it offends in that respect.
Overmod You gotta watch out for these trees, I'm telling you. Ask Saruman at Isengard what he thinks about them. Or Jesus -- he made a life's work out of mutilating them... but they got their revenge on him in the end. I ask you, can you trust Christ-killing things you can't even reason with?
Although I'm not personally offended, your post seems tasteless and pretty tangential to the topic.
Overmod daveklepper How dare you use the C___t word!!!!! It's a participle that means 'anointed'. Would you prefer I refer to him as 'Oily Josh'? Interestingly no American denomination pronounces the name correctly. (Which should not be surprising considering they can't pronounce 'thou' correctly either... let alone understand how it is grammatically used.) None of this addresses faith at all, or is supposed to. Just as the map is not the territory, the name doesn't define the person. The Orthodox do this in a slightly different manner by never naming the Eternal, even in print; in my opinion we can kid a bit about the carpenter part without, well, the other. More specifically, thinking about it a bit, I did not intend to reference any other religious groups 'historically reviled' for you-know-what. I will happily take that reference out if it offends in that respect.
daveklepper How dare you use the C___t word!!!!!
It's a participle that means 'anointed'. Would you prefer I refer to him as 'Oily Josh'?
Bizarre. Can't you just admit your original post was offensive to some/many and leave it at that?
charlie hebdoCan't you just admit your original post was offensive to some/many and leave it at that?
It is not as if the thread would stand or fall if a humorously-intended post fell flat or not, so no one would (or should) miss it. And in any case far more posts viciously directed against the particular group in question and likely far more "offensive" to it, remain not only unacknowledged, but unapologized for.
Rationalization, as expected.
This thread is operating in excess of Track Speed.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.