Trains.com

Metrolink Tier 4 Locomotive Schedule Update (9-23-16 Metrolink Board Agenda)

2070 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Altadena, CA
  • 340 posts
Metrolink Tier 4 Locomotive Schedule Update (9-23-16 Metrolink Board Agenda)
Posted by 081552 on Tuesday, September 20, 2016 6:11 PM

The delivery schedule of Tier 4 locomotives has been revised. Previously, nine additional locomotives were scheduled to be delivered by the end of 2016. That number has been
reduced to four locomotives.
The locomotive manufacturer, EMD/Progress Rail, is working through some difficulties as the manufacturing process has encountered quality issues stemming from vendors who
supply materials and components used to build the locomotive. Correcting these problems has significantly delayed project delivery.
The manufacturer has been taking actions to correct these deficiencies with the suppliers and dealing with internal issues
within their organization. We are working closely with EMD
to ensure the project is back on schedule by May of 2017.
RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Tuesday, September 20, 2016 8:52 PM

Yikes!

Entropy, is this material problem related to the diesel prime mover itself?

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 7,968 posts
Posted by K. P. Harrier on Tuesday, September 20, 2016 9:22 PM

Does that mean SCAX No. 905 will be heading back to EMD for the corrections? 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.P.’s absolute “theorem” from early, early childhood that he has seen over and over and over again: Those that CAUSE a problem in the first place will act the most violently if questioned or exposed.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Wednesday, September 21, 2016 8:44 AM

RME

Yikes!

Entropy, is this material problem related to the diesel prime mover itself?

 

 

Since Progress/EMD is a subsidiary of Caterpillar, the engine is in-house and the reference to "suppliers" suggest that the problem is something from outside Caterpillar/Progress.

Of course, in this case the carbody is contracted out, so it could be almost anything except the engine...

M636C

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • 62 posts
Posted by WM7471 on Monday, September 26, 2016 11:22 AM

I wonder if this has anything to do with the sale of the Vossloh plant in Valencia, Spain to Stadler.  IRRC the F-125 bodies and a number of the other components were being built there, not in Muncie.   Vossloh was building a new plant in Kiel, Germany, but I don't know it's status.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy