Trains.com

When did Norfolk & Western go all diesel?

13713 views
32 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Wednesday, October 7, 2015 1:07 PM

It wasn't in 1948 actually. That's the year that they were built by Baldwin.

The sale to N&W after C&O changed their motive power course was 1950. 

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,289 posts
Posted by carnej1 on Wednesday, October 7, 2015 11:36 AM

L LASKOWSKI

 

 
ndbprr
Didn't N&W purchase the last steam engine from a manufacturer? I believe it was an 0-8-0 switcher.
 

 

 

  I thought the N&W bought up a group of nearly new C&O 0-8-0s which eliminated the need to build further copiies of the N&W 0-8-0

 

 

N&W bought 30 almost brand new Baldwin 0-8-0 switchers from C&O in 1948. The N&W was so satisfied with these engines, basically built to USRA specs,that the railroad but 45 near copies in it's Roanoke shops between 1951-1953.

The final engine of that order was the last new steam locomotive built for Class 1 service in the United States, a few years after the Big 3 locomotive builders had stopped building steam for the domestic market.

 That shows how committed Norfolk & Western was to steam power into the 50's but very soon afterwards the road reversed course and started to buy Alco and Emd diesels..

"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock

  • Member since
    November 2014
  • 1 posts
Posted by L LASKOWSKI on Monday, October 5, 2015 9:03 PM

ndbprr
Didn't N&W purchase the last steam engine from a manufacturer? I believe it was an 0-8-0 switcher.
 

  I thought the N&W bought up a group of nearly new C&O 0-8-0s which eliminated the need to build further copiies of the N&W 0-8-0

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, October 5, 2015 7:17 AM

CSX was smart to take its time in completing the merger.  Aside from the UP/SP debacle, there have been any number of airline mergers that were rushed to completion with corresponding operational problems, United+Continental being the most recent example.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, October 4, 2015 6:09 PM

Firelock76

Certainly true NorthWest, when we moved to Richmond, VA in 1987 there were still quite a few locomotives operated by CSX that still had their Seaboard Coast Lines, Family Lines, L&N, and Chessie System  markings.  And on occasion you'd see one with C&O markings, but not so often as the others.

It seemed like CSX wasn't in any great rush to repaint back then.

Not only weren't they in a hurry to repaint, they weren't in a hurry to merge the operations.  CSX was formed Nov. 1, 1980.  Outside of a few 'coordintion projects', Chessie & Seaboard operated as separate organizations until approximately 1986 when the decision was made on whose computer system was going to be the one that ran the combined organization.  Once that decision was made and the equipment installation and training effort undertaken to train field personnel on on the 'losing' property, the merging of individual departments was undertaken based on the plans that hae been formulated during the 5+ years the organizations operated separately.

Mergers of large organization is not something to be done without a lot of attention to the small details.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Sunday, October 4, 2015 11:37 AM

Certainly true NorthWest, when we moved to Richmond, VA in 1987 there were still quite a few locomotives operated by CSX that still had their Seaboard Coast Lines, Family Lines, L&N, and Chessie System  markings.  And on occasion you'd see one with C&O markings, but not so often as the others.

It seemed like CSX wasn't in any great rush to repaint back then.

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Sunday, October 4, 2015 10:11 AM

I doubt it. Well-run mergers tend to leave actual operations alone for months as equipment is renumbered and worked into the agreed-upon number system.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Sunday, October 4, 2015 10:06 AM

When did Norfolk and Western go all diesel?

Too damn soon!

Grrrrrrr.....

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Northern VA
  • 484 posts
Posted by feltonhill on Friday, October 2, 2015 5:23 PM

I don't have a definitive answer to the queston, but  I don't recall any discussion at teh N&W archives relating to N&W power operating on the VGN post merger.

DRS (aka feltonhill)

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Friday, October 2, 2015 12:57 PM

It seems the N&W-VGN merger was eff 1 Dec 1959-- so no N&W locomotives of any kind on VGN until then?

Hard to believe on 2 Dec 1959 N&W management would say "Let's send a Y6b over to Mullens and see if they have any use for it."

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Friday, October 2, 2015 6:29 AM

Did the Virginian even have the infrastructure left to support steam? I suspect the answer is yes, but active steam had been dead for a while and besides some remnants, was off the property by merger day. 

It wouldn't of been terribly unusual for that answer to be no. It often decided, such as on the Pennsy, which divisions got steam during the few years where significant numbers of steam were kept as reserve power. 

A previously dieselized division of that road (The Conemaugh Division) was basically converted back to steam in one famous instance and the diesels reassigned during a severe power shortage.

That happened precisely because the necessary servicing facilities were still present on that route after a year or more of no steam. And even then, they had to erect a new 35,000 gallon water tank in one location and run canteen cars on another route due to a demolished water facilitiy. Often, a practical return to steam was impossible in short order after dieselization. 

Trains even coined a new term that year, "de-dieselization".

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Friday, October 2, 2015 6:03 AM

carnej1
Does anyone know if N&W operated any of their own steam power on former Virginian lines after the merger? I know that's a pretty obscure topic but I would like to know..

I am waiting for someone like BigJim (or Dave Stephenson) who would know a definitive answer.

But I find it almost incredibly unlikely.  By the date of the merger, Virginian was very effectively dieselized, and electric operations continued without replacement (contrary to the N&W experience at elkhorn Tunnel, where the older electrification was supplanted by steam).  There would have been little or none of the specialized infrastructure like lubritoria that made systematic steam operations so efficient onN&W proper, whereas it could be expected that Virginian had its customary efficiency in place for FM diesel service, at least. 

Although it might be possible that N&W ran some post-merger clearance tests with steam, it was my understanding that by 1959 any use or extension of steam was officially 'dead' as a matter of policy - so what would be the point?

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,289 posts
Posted by carnej1 on Thursday, October 1, 2015 11:27 AM

Wizlish

End of steam on Virginian was mid-1957, with any remaining dead locomotives gone by 1960.

 

Thanks.

But to restate the second part of my question:

Does anyone know if N&W operated any of their own steam power on former Virginian lines after the merger?

I know that's a pretty obscure topic but I would like to know..

"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Wednesday, September 30, 2015 9:41 PM

Some were still on the property past merger day. I've seen pictures from late 1959 of several Virginian locomotives like #906, a completely rebuilt Allegheny that was never ran.

Would've been nice to see them save that one before the merger was official, since N&W's president at the time would've never been bothered and just sealed her fate. I suspect they had thoughts of such a thing, and several well kept and freshly painted engines were displayed during the 1959 NRHS convention that were being kept indoors.

And what about Pacific #212? She led #3 on the Virginian's last day of passenger service and was put on display in Roanoke, but eventually disappeared sometime after merger day. Presumably, N&W didn't share their enthusiasm and had the exhibit scrapped. 

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Wednesday, September 30, 2015 2:00 PM

End of steam on Virginian was mid-1957, with any remaining dead locomotives gone by 1960.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,289 posts
Posted by carnej1 on Wednesday, September 30, 2015 11:23 AM

 This thread brings to mind something I've wondered about: Am I correct that by the time of the 1959 Merger with Norfolk & Western, the Virginian Railway had completely ended Steam operations?

 Did N&W operate any of it's own Steam power on the former Virginian lines?

 It's an interesting "what if" scenario: imagine Virginian Blue Ridge 2-6-6-6s (Alleghenies) pulling long strings of hoppers with Y and A helpers and pushers..

 

 

 

"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:55 AM

Commercial steam production (Or producing your own motive power in-house like the N&W did) isn't really the same thing as we've seen since then on the Mt. Washington Cog Railway and such. 

Steam locomotives have been produced since then, but they've been speciality items from companies that aren't in the business of producing and marketing steam locomotives. And they haven't been built for common carriers or industrial uses, but as tourists power. 

selector
Last mainline steam locomotive built in the USA was Y6b #2200, in Roanoke, in 1952, according to a number of sources.  I believe some yard switchers were erected here and there after that date.

Nope, as already posted in this thread, BLH built export steam into the mid 1950's. For instance, they built 50 2-8-2's for India in 1954, perhaps marking the end.

And Y6b #2200 isn't typically considered the last. While the final mainline locomotive built for an American railroad,  the end is generally viewed as being marked by N&W #244, an 0-8-0 switcher outshopped by Roanoke in December 1953.

While power intended mainly for yards, that's typically viewed as the last steam locomotive built here for a US railroad.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Saturday, September 26, 2015 10:12 PM

Last mainline steam locomotive built in the USA was Y6b #2200, in Roanoke, in 1952, according to a number of sources.  I believe some yard switchers were erected here and there after that date.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Friday, August 28, 2015 11:26 AM

To echo what 16-567D3A said, keep in mind outfits like Crown Products were building steam locomotives for a number of years for amusement parks and tourist attractions, and there's David Kloke building new steam locomotive today.  But we have to say that the steam era ended when both N&W and GTW stopped running steam in 1960.  The narrow gauge lines and small 'roads that kept steam in service, while interesting, really don't figure into the big picture.  They're anomalys, not the rule.

In the same vein, when I was in the gun business people would ask me when the era of muzzle-loaders ended.  My answer was in a way, it never did.  Even after breech-loaders were invented muzzle-loading guns were still produced well into the 20th Century in places like Belgium for export to Third-World countries where the populace were limited to primitive firearm purchases.  But again, this is the exception that doesn't prove the rule.

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Thursday, August 27, 2015 12:25 PM

Those 30 2nd hand purchases were built by Baldwin in 1948.

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:27 AM

ndbprr
Didn't N&W purchase the last steam engine from a manufacturer? I believe it was an 0-8-0 switcher.
 

   I can't find my references right now, but as I recall, N&W bought some 0-8-0 switchers from C&O, then built more based on that design.   I don't remember who built them for C&O.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • From: La Grange Illinois USA
  • 131 posts
Posted by 16-567D3A on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 10:51 PM

.

  • Member since
    April 2011
  • 649 posts
Posted by LensCapOn on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 10:24 PM

16-567D3A

 

 
ndbprr
Didn't N&W purchase the last steam engine from a manufacturer? I believe it was an 0-8-0 switcher.
 

 

 

N&W's Roanoke shops built the last new Steam engine for a US Railroad, in December 1953, S-1a  0-8-0 #244. ALCO's last Steam Locomotive was P&LE 2-8-4 #9401 in June 1948.  LIMA's last Steam Locomotive was Nickel Plate 2-8-4 #779 in May 1949. BALDWIN'S last Steam Locomotive Built for a US Railroad was C&O H6 2-6-6-2 #1309 Delivered September 1949. 50 2-8-2s for export to India in 1954 were the last Baldwin steam locomotive's built.

 

 

My memory isn't certain...., but didn't theMount Washington Cog Railway build a new steam engine in their own shop much later then that?

 

I might need to search my TRAINS back issues on that.

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 5:38 PM

If we're including exports, the Canadian Locomotive Company in Kingston was the last commercial steam builder in North America. 

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • From: La Grange Illinois USA
  • 131 posts
Posted by 16-567D3A on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 5:36 PM

.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Wednesday, August 26, 2015 3:31 PM
Didn't N&W purchase the last steam engine from a manufacturer? I believe it was an 0-8-0 switcher.
  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Tuesday, August 25, 2015 7:40 PM

Do the Lamberts Point electric transfer cars count? Not sure how long they lasted, but I've seen pictures from around this time period of them in action. So they quite possibly outlasted the former Virginian mainline electrification.

The Virginian also used similar cars at the Sewell's Point coal piers, a facility which N&W shuttered immediately in favor of Lambert's Point.

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Tuesday, August 25, 2015 3:42 PM

Forgot about the electrification.

LensCapOn

Please define "all diesel" since they kept 611 for a while and had it running more than once. (Same goes for UP since 844 was never really off the books, although it had to play as 8444 for a couple decades...)

 

No, Norfolk & Western didn't run any steam excursions after the end of commercial steam service.

The 611 pulled the last steam excursion on the line on October 24th 1959, over half a year before freight service ended. That's the trip, I believe, that was famous for going past the century mark, although it's debated over these days [Edit: Looks like that was a Washington DC trip on October 18th].

Not too long after that trip, after a period in storage where she was threatened with scrapping, she went to Roanoke. It was the Southern Railway that resurrected steam after famously dieselizing early and with little sign of sentiment at the time, whose program remained active into the mid 1990's under the merged Norfolk Southern umbrella. 

Not another UP 844 style deal.  

  • Member since
    April 2011
  • 649 posts
Posted by LensCapOn on Tuesday, August 25, 2015 1:15 PM

Please define "all diesel" since they kept 611 for a while and had it running more than once. (Same goes for UP since 844 was never really off the books, although it had to play as 8444 for a couple decades...)

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy