Trains.com

Will F-units make a comeback?

17902 views
36 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Saturday, December 22, 2012 2:55 PM

No surprise NS bought some more F's.  They may be old, but they ARE cool, and they provide a classic head end to their office trains with (probably) a minimum of maintanance headaches. 

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,289 posts
Posted by carnej1 on Saturday, December 22, 2012 1:11 PM

Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't modern passenger diesels which use monocoque style carbodies somewhat similiar to F units? I know the body shell is stressed in such designs but IINM the shell can be lifted off to service the machinery...

"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Saturday, December 22, 2012 12:34 PM

lone geep

From another thread here, there are many shortlines that still use F-units for freight. One reason why they disappeared from Class 1s is that the engineer couldn't see backwards that well. But know, most big power isn't mean't to be run long hood forward anymore. So is there a slight possibility that the F-unit shape will come back?

With a defference to Posters Chuck and Jim and Firelock:

There comes a story like this from TRAINSNewswire of December 21,2012:  as follows FTA:

"Norfolk Southern acquires additional F-units"

By Chris Guss
Published: December 21, 2012
5004612691_722f264a5b_z
Two of the current NS F-units on a ferry move at Marion, Ohio, on Sept. 18, 2010.
Photo by Brian Schmidt

FTA:"...CHICAGO – Norfolk Southern has acquired an additional three F7 locomotives. The three units are located at two National Railway Equipment facilities in the Midwest. Former Canadian National EMD F7A No. 9177 is located at NRE Dixmoor, Ill. Two additional units, former Coe Rail F7A No. 407 and former Canadian Pacific F7B No. 1019 are reportedly at NRE’s Mt. Vernon. Ill., Facility. No. 9177 has reportedly been relettered SOU No. 9177 at Dixmoor.

Norfolk Southern Spokesman Robin Chapman declined to comment on the locomotives..."

It seems like the old saying of "...Never say Never..." Has come to this Hobby and avocation in spades this last few weeks.  First there is the announcement that UPRR is in negotiation for re-acquiring a "Big Boy" to potentially incorporate into their Heritage Steam Operations" .  Still waiting the outcome on that and then apparently comes word that NS is shoping for some EMD "F's !  The smart money would guess  there would be to add to their fleet of Office Car Power (?)   More class to an already class operation.Bow

 

 


 

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Saturday, December 22, 2012 11:55 AM

Keep in mind taking a cue from the automotive side of the house GM offered trade-in values on the F units in an attempt to keep moving product, which is why a lot of 'roads were happy to trade in their F units on new Geeps and SD's.  Some 'roads didn't, which is why there's still some F units out there, otherwise they'd be darn near extinct.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: SE Minnesota
  • 6,847 posts
Posted by jrbernier on Friday, December 21, 2012 9:28 PM

  The 'F' has a trussed car body - it costs more to build than a road switcher type of unit(sheet metal hood over the engine that is mounted to rather heavy-duty frame rails).   EMD figured this out with the GP7, and sold them for less than an equivalent F7.  It did not take the railroads long to figure out that a GP would do everything that a F can, and cost less!

  Maintenance with an F requires pulling the prime mover out of the car body.  A power assembly can be pulled from a GP with the side access doors opened.  When access is simple, things get fixed faster and there are less road failures.

Jim

Modeling BNSF  and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Friday, December 21, 2012 2:51 PM

The F-unit shape 'came back' in the form of 'cowl' units - full-width cosmetic carbodies on switcher-style frames.

The key difference between the original covered wagons and the later full-width carbody types was that in the earlier form the sides were structural trusses that supported the frame to prevent sag.  Returning to that design is, to put it mildly, improbable.

The one big advantage of the narrow hood, absent in the full-width body, is the ability to open a couple of doors and have easy maintenance access from a built-in, easily accessible platform which leaves 'wiggle room' between rails and stanchions.  With a solid car side, that wiggle room isn't there.

Chuck

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • From: outside of London, Ontario
  • 389 posts
Will F-units make a comeback?
Posted by lone geep on Friday, December 21, 2012 2:26 PM

From another thread here, there are many shortlines that still use F-units for freight. One reason why they disappeared from Class 1s is that the engineer couldn't see backwards that well. But know, most big power isn't mean't to be run long hood forward anymore. So is there a slight possibility that the F-unit shape will come back?

Lone Geep 

 \

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy