Trains.com

Why 79 mph

9393 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Mooresville, NC
  • 90 posts
Why 79 mph
Posted by FTGT725 on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 2:50 PM
Could someone explain why many railroads have 79 mph as the track speed. Why not make it an even 80 Mph?
In my experience, the light at the end of the tunnel is usually the train.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: US
  • 383 posts
Posted by CG9602 on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 3:49 PM
One reason is the FRA requirement that, for a route to have a speed limit greater than 79 mph, the route must have either ATS, ATC, or cab signals. The railroads also have to pay for their maintenance and upkeep out of their own funds. rather than pay for the expense of maintaining track to a higher standard, and having to maintain the additional cab signals, and having to outfit all locomotives that use the line with cab signals, or ATS, or ATC, the freight RRs simply place the speed limit at 79 mph, and use Automatic Block signal systems.

If you are asking why the ICC (and, currently, the FRA) arrived at 79 mph as the speed threshold for cab signals / automatic train stop / automatic train control, instead of some other speed, I don't know. Rumor has it that in Canada, the regulations allow for a 100 mph speed limit while using automatic block signal systems.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,337 posts
Posted by timz on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:25 PM
When the ICC set the rule in 1947, apparently their mindset was that RR speed limits were set in stone. They said (roughly) "If your passenger limit is 80 mph or higher, you must have or install blah blah... if your passenger limit is 60 or higher you must have or install blah blah..." They figured they were requiring certain signal installations-- but, it turned out they were actually requiring reductions in timetable speed limits. On many RRs, anyway. One suspects that some railroads dutifully put the 79 limit in their timetables and turned a blind eye to violations-- SAL being a likely example.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, January 24, 2008 12:42 PM

It was a somewhat-arbitrary speed, chosen by factoring in stopping distances, distance between signals, and terrain.  It could have been 75mph just as easily as 85mph. 

A similar situation exists on the highways.  Why 55mph?  Why not 60?  Why not 50? Why not 57?  On city streets--why 25mph, or 30?  It's a compromise.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,337 posts
Posted by timz on Thursday, January 24, 2008 2:55 PM

 zardoz wrote:
It was a somewhat-arbitrary speed, chosen by factoring in stopping distances, distance between signals, and terrain.

If the ICC had factored those things in, the resulting limit would have been different for each subdivision of each railroad. They had no interest in doing that, even if it were feasible, which it wasn't.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,786 posts
Posted by wjstix on Thursday, January 24, 2008 4:58 PM
I think part of it is just that if they said "80" it would be easier to fudge a little and go 82 or 83 or whatever. "79" makes it clear that you can't go 80 or faster. Kinda the same thing that makes something costing $1.99 sound a lot cheaper than something costing $2.00.
Stix
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Winnipeg, Mb
  • 628 posts
Posted by traisessive1 on Friday, January 25, 2008 10:12 AM
VIA goes up to 100mph and does not have cab signals.

10000 feet and no dynamics? Today is going to be a good day ... 

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,483 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, January 25, 2008 10:14 AM

 traisessive1 wrote:
VIA goes up to 100mph and does not have cab signals.

The ICC did not have any jurisdiction outside of the United States.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Austin,TX
  • 537 posts
Posted by chefjavier on Friday, January 25, 2008 9:22 PM
What about track perfomance? Does hold for the speed limit?
Javier
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 302 posts
Posted by JT22CW on Friday, January 25, 2008 11:42 PM
IINM, the top speed allowed for CTC in pretty much the rest of the world is 100 mph.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Winnipeg, Mb
  • 628 posts
Posted by traisessive1 on Saturday, January 26, 2008 2:57 PM
The track is the same crap CN track as everywhere else. It's dangerous track. Just the coaches that have the tilt capabilities (LRC coaches) can do the 100mph.

10000 feet and no dynamics? Today is going to be a good day ... 

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Saturday, January 26, 2008 3:30 PM

In the U.S., maximum speed limit has both a track geometry/defect limit and a Method of Operation limit, whichever is more restrictive is the one that applies:

Track speed limit, as proscribed by 49 CFR 231.9 and 49 CFR 213.307, in mph:

Track Class		Freight		Passenger
Excepted track 10 N/A
Class 1 track 10 15
Class 2 track 25 30
Class 3 track 40 60
Class 4 track 60 80
Class 5 track 80 90
Class 6 track...110 m.p.h.
Class 7 track...125 m.p.h.
Class 8 track...160 m.p.h.
Class 9 track...200 m.p.h. 
Method of Operation speed limit, as proscribed by 49 CFR 236.0:
    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part 
applies to railroads that operate on standard gage track which is part
of the general railroad system of transportation.
(b) This part does not apply to rail rapid transit operations
conducted over track that is used exclusively for that purpose and that
is not part of the general system of railroad transportation.
(c) Where a passenger train is operated at a speed of 60 or more
miles per hour, or a freight train is operated at a speed of 50 or more
miles per hour, a block signal system complying with the provisions of
this part shall be installed or a manual block system shall be placed
permanently in effect which shall conform to the following conditions:
(1) A passenger train shall not be admitted to a block occupied by
another train except under flag protection;
(2) No train shall be admitted to a block occupied by a passenger
train except under flag protection;
(3) No train shall be admitted to a block occupied by an opposing
train except under flag protection; and
(4) A freight train, including a work train, may be authorized to
follow a freight train, including a work train, into a block but the
following train must proceed prepared to stop within one-half the range
of vision but not exceeding 20 miles per hour.
(d) Where any train is operated at a speed of 80 or more miles per
hour, an automatic cab signal, automatic train stop or automatic train
control system complying with the provisions of this part shall be
installed.
RWM
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 26, 2008 3:58 PM

We can forget HST, TGV's and Bullets then.

Getting an Agency to change speeds higher (Much higher) is like trying to tow Mt Everest.

Personally I think if 80 is good, 110 is better but not much.

So much for the Milwalkee track sign "Slow to 90"

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Saturday, January 26, 2008 4:11 PM
 Falls Valley RR wrote:

We can forget HST, TGV's and Bullets then.

Getting an Agency to change speeds higher (Much higher) is like trying to tow Mt Everest.

Personally I think if 80 is good, 110 is better but not much.

So much for the Milwalkee track sign "Slow to 90"

Not so -- it's just "forget about it" with track and train-control system that doesn't meet the requisite FRA standard.

There are two advantages of increasing speeds from 80 mph to 110 mph -- better platform-to-platform times and increased track capacity.

RWM 

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Austin,TX
  • 537 posts
Posted by chefjavier on Saturday, January 26, 2008 4:19 PM
 Railway Man wrote:

In the U.S., maximum speed limit has both a track geometry/defect limit and a Method of Operation limit, whichever is more restrictive is the one that applies:

Track speed limit, as proscribed by 49 CFR 231.9 and 49 CFR 213.307, in mph:

Track Class		Freight		Passenger
Excepted track 10 N/A
Class 1 track 10 15
Class 2 track 25 30
Class 3 track 40 60
Class 4 track 60 80
Class 5 track 80 90
Class 6 track...110 m.p.h.
Class 7 track...125 m.p.h.
Class 8 track...160 m.p.h.
Class 9 track...200 m.p.h. 
Method of Operation speed limit, as proscribed by 49 CFR 236.0:
    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part 
applies to railroads that operate on standard gage track which is part
of the general railroad system of transportation.
(b) This part does not apply to rail rapid transit operations
conducted over track that is used exclusively for that purpose and that
is not part of the general system of railroad transportation.
(c) Where a passenger train is operated at a speed of 60 or more
miles per hour, or a freight train is operated at a speed of 50 or more
miles per hour, a block signal system complying with the provisions of
this part shall be installed or a manual block system shall be placed
permanently in effect which shall conform to the following conditions:
(1) A passenger train shall not be admitted to a block occupied by
another train except under flag protection;
(2) No train shall be admitted to a block occupied by a passenger
train except under flag protection;
(3) No train shall be admitted to a block occupied by an opposing
train except under flag protection; and
(4) A freight train, including a work train, may be authorized to
follow a freight train, including a work train, into a block but the
following train must proceed prepared to stop within one-half the range
of vision but not exceeding 20 miles per hour.
(d) Where any train is operated at a speed of 80 or more miles per
hour, an automatic cab signal, automatic train stop or automatic train
control system complying with the provisions of this part shall be
installed.

RWM

RWM

Great Info.What is our current track class in Regional & Shortline Railroads? Do we have anything higher than Class 7 in U.S.? I know in Europe is higher..Whistling [:-^]

Javier

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy