Would it be state boiler inspectors? Federal Railway Adminstration? OSHA? Western Maryland 734 is under inspection but I cant find out who is doing the work and why it would take 10 years to complete.
The FRA.
Under some circumstances, don't ask me what, a steam locomotive is exempt from FRA standards and only subject to state standards. Someone who's heavily involved with a steam restoration project could explain it far better than I can.
For example, that little 0-4-0 saddletanker down in Texas that's the subject of today's "Trains News" is FRA exempt.
And it shouldn't take ten years to get the WM 2-8-0 back in service. You may be confusing the FRA inspection/rebuild requirement timetable of 1,400 days of operation or 15 years, whichever comes first with the actual rebuild time.
If it takes ten years it may be due to parts availability or manufacture and that old bugaboo, money.
CandOforprogress2Would it be state boiler inspectors? Federal Railway [sic] Administration? OSHA?
Let's just shut this off with an actual reference:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/49/part-230
There are some other references in CFR 49 affecting steam-locomotive practice, but you can easily find them in eCFR with a little reading.
...and then there's this little thing called $$$ that the restoration group probably has precious little of and then discovered there is a lot more involved than their optimistic initial appraisal. The regulating agency probably isn't the problem here.
mudchicken...and then there's this little thing called $$$ that the restoration group probably has precious little of and then discovered there is a lot more involved than their optimistic initial appraisal.
I think part of this situation is more likely 'priorities' for what would otherwise be adequate $$$ - as with, in a different context, the pace of rebuilding for UP 3985.
The priority now is on finishing the Mallet, and when she's done there may be comparatively little need to have the 2-8-0 also running. If I remember correctly there are some critical problems with their ROW integrity, at least one of which may require a considerable volume in cubic dollars to repair. I can easily see a good organization adjusting a reasonably competent PERT or PMP to take longer, perhaps much longer, than a full-priority 1472-day would otherwise involve.
mudchicken ...and then there's this little thing called $$$ that the restoration group probably has precious little of and then discovered there is a lot more involved than their optimistic initial appraisal. The regulating agency probably isn't the problem here.
Quite true. The master at this, Lynn Moedinger of the Strasburg Railroad has said
"....it's always going to cost more than you think it will if you do it right. I've never been right on an estimate yet."
And if he says that, then well...
RME CandOforprogress2 Would it be state boiler inspectors? Federal Railway [sic] Administration? OSHA? Let's just shut this off with an actual reference: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/49/part-230 There are some other references in CFR 49 affecting steam-locomotive practice, but you can easily find them in eCFR with a little reading.
CandOforprogress2 Would it be state boiler inspectors? Federal Railway [sic] Administration? OSHA?
Actually, the answer to this question isn't that complicated. Let me try:
1. Subject to the exception described in #2 below, all railroad steam locomotives (24" gauge or greater) are regulated by the Federal Railroad Administration, not by state boiler inspectors. This includes excursion locomotives used on freight railroads, regardless of ownership. It also includes locomotives used on most tourist railroads, even if those roads aren't part of the general railroad system.
2. Now for the exception. The major exception is that a locomotive used solely on an "insular" railroad isn't regulated by FRA. An "insular" railroad is a passenger railroad that's not part of the general railroad system, and operates in an "enclave" with no public grade crossings or bridges over a public roads or navigable waterways, and certain other features specified in the FRA rule (49 CFR 230.2(b)(4)). Essentially, this exception covers amusement park railroads (think Disneyworld) and railroads like them. The steam locomotives on railroads covered by this exception are regulated by the states.
Clear as mud?
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.