Trains.com

Chuffing?

17624 views
33 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Sunday, August 5, 2012 2:30 PM

bubbajustin

We all know the sound, CHUFF CHUFF, CHUF,CHUFF, of a steam locomotive. It is one of the best sounds, In my opinion, that man has ever created.

But something that I never have understood is what exactly is happaning when you hear that chuffing sound? I know it's something to do with airflow, but I don't know much else...

What is happaning during those shuffing sounds?

-Justin

In all responses to Justin's question, I do not recall seeing one thing mentioned--what causes the chuff? As the used steam reaches the atmosphere, it is still under compression, and expands suddenly, this, and the noise of the expansion is the chuff.

I am sure  most of us know this; even Justin may have been aware of  it, but for the benefit of any who may not have been aware, I have posted my response.

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2011
  • From: Bradford County, PA
  • 1,319 posts
Posted by Lehigh Valley 2089 on Monday, July 30, 2012 9:25 AM

Everyone seems to have answered the basic question, but I will provide a guide as to how many you hear per revolution of the drivers.

Non articulated, 2 cylinder: 4 per

Compound Mallet, 4 cylinder: 4 per (uses steam 2 times, results in 4 per)

Non articulated, 3 cylinder: 6 per (extra cylinder adds 2 per)

Simple articulated, 4 cylinder: 8 per

Duplex drive, 4 cylinder: 8 per (steam used once in each cylinder)

Geared engines will have a much higher count than any listed here, because they have drive shafts and gears and not drive rods, so it takes many more revolutions to sustain a low speed, because the gears are much smaller than a standard drive wheel. Same with cog locomotives.

The Lehigh Valley Railroad, the Route of the Black Diamond Express, John Wilkes and Maple Leaf.

-Jake, modeling the Barclay, Towanda & Susquehanna.

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,019 posts
Posted by BigJim on Saturday, June 23, 2012 7:17 PM

Paul,
If you read the explanation of the ALCO - Mellon document at the link I provided early in this discussion (here it is again and I highly recommend that  you take the time to read it: http://www.catskillarchive.com/rrextra/mallet.Html) , it is explained that the supply of live steam at a reduced presure to the low pressure cylinders and the subsequent changeover to high pressure cylinder exhaust steam, when starting, was automatic and was initiated by a differencial in pressure acting on the sliding intercepting valve.

The pictures show how the reducing and intercepting valve are housed deep in the high pressure cylinder saddle.

Also, a "starting" or "simpling" valve was located in the cab ( of all compound locomotives) for the engineer to use IF the need arised to help start the train or to keep the train moving if it was about to stall. This valve piped high pressure steam to one face of the intercepting valve in order to move it into "simple" position.

What the document doesn't tell you, because it hadn't been invented yet, is that when Mr. Pilcher of the N&W designed the "external reducing & booster valve, some of the chambers inside the high pressure cylinder saddle were removed and changed how things operated.

.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 2,741 posts
Posted by Paul Milenkovic on Friday, June 22, 2012 7:38 PM

tomikawaTT

At some relatively low speed, the high pressure cylinder exhaust would be diverted to the receiver, and thence to the low pressure cylinders, by the intercepting valve.  This happened automatically.  (The major difference between the Y6b and earlier Mallets was that the interceptor valve wouldn't go to compound mode until the locomotive reached 10MPH, and would revert to simple if the speed dropped below 10MPH.  Earlier Ys changed over at 4MPH.)

When I first heard the term "intercepting valve" regarding the changeover from simple to compound operation, I thought, well, there is this valve in the cab with a handle you turn to operate it.

In the context of Chapelon's work on the importance of non-restricting steam passages in both the admission and exhaust lines to the cylinders, it occured to me that maybe this intercepting valve is a substantial hunk of metal, perhaps operated with a steam power assist in the way of the power assist for the reversing link on a big locomotive.

Am I right, that the intercepting valve, which has to route and reroute substantial volumes of power producing steam, is of substantial size, and perhaps operated by a steam servo cylinder?  On an N&W Y-class, where is it -- is it buried in the smokebox or steam dome or between the front cylinders, or can you see it as this lump or wart on pictures or drawings of the locomotive?

Maybe off-topic, but on a Mallet or simple articulated, you can see the massive steam pipes connecting the front engine.  On a Beyer-Garratt, I can't see the steam pipes -- as with the intercepting valve on a Mallet, where are the steam pipes hidden?

If GM "killed the electric car", what am I doing standing next to an EV-1, a half a block from the WSOR tracks?

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, June 21, 2012 8:33 PM

As to the rain of cinders, one evening as I waited by the engine for the Pelican to leave Bristol, I was warned about the coming shower by an N&W employee. It was always a beautiful sight to see the J handle the train that the Southern had brought in from New Orleans behind two E's, especially since two sleepers were added in Bristol (one for New York and one for Richmond). Incidentally, no one ever questioned my presence by the engine back then (1954-1957).

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 2:33 PM

Modelcar

......And don't forget the "rain" of small cinders falling down as it passes, especially if it's working hard....and your on the side of the track to which the wind is blowing.

As a child, I remember attending a B&O Pittsburgh Division company picnic that was held at a picnic ground adjacent to the B&O's P&W Subdivision at Mars, PA which was about midway up the Bakerstown Hill that extended from Etna, PA to Bakerstown, PA.  Recall watching a coal train, working hard, headed upgrade with a Mallet on the head end and two Mallet's on the rear end - as I recall, it rained cinders for about 15 minutes after the passage of the train.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, June 17, 2012 8:07 PM

......And don't forget the "rain" of small cinders falling down as it passes, especially if it's working hard....and your on the side of the track to which the wind is blowing.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Cordes Jct Ariz.
  • 1,305 posts
Posted by switch7frg on Sunday, June 17, 2012 6:01 PM

Smile All this information is absolute. To realise this more one would have to have been there standing by  the ROW   when  one went by ~~ to feel the power  as the ground shook . This is hard to imagine, I know I was there many times . Has any one stood by one  and listened  to it  simmer and sputter   andthe air compressor chuff ??   ~~~  Y6b s  evergreen in my mind

                                                      Cannonball

Y6bs evergreen in my mind

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:02 AM

Semper Vaporo

The steam engine works by using steam that is created in a confined space (the boiler) and letting that steam into a cylinder that has a piston in it that can move due to the pressure of the steam.  That moving piston is connected to the main rod to turn the wheels 1/2 turn. 

When the piston has reached the end of its travel, there is still pressure in the steam and in order for the piston to return to the other end (and the wheel to continue to rotate) the pressure of that steam must be released. 

The steam that is released is put to one more use after most of the pressure has been used in the cylinder to move the piston.  That steam passes though some pipes to the bottom of the smoke box directly below the chimney.   There a pipe, appropriately known as the "Blast Pipe" aims the steam directly up the chimney.  The moving steam in the chimney creates a draft of air going up the chimney.

The air that is moved up the chimney has to come from somewhere and that is through the flue tubes in the boiler.  That air has  to come from someplace and that is from the firebox at the other end of the boiler.  And of course, that air has to come from somplace and that is from the openings in the grate on bottom of the firebox where the fuel is being burned.  The fresh air being drawn in that way helps the fire burn hotter which creates more steam to be used to make the pistons move and thus move the locomotive.

Anyway, it is that sudden release of steam up the chimney that makes the chuffing sound.  On the most common configuration of a locomotive there are FOUR chuffs per revolution of the wheels.  There are two pistons, one on each side of the locomotive, and each piston is alternately pushed to one end by steam and when the piston reverses direction and pushed from the other end by steam, the steam is released, creating a chuff.  You hear a chuff from the front end of one cylinder, then a chuff from the front end of the other cylinder, then a chuff from the rear of the first cylinder and then a chuff from the rear of the other cylinder.  At that point the first cylinder is already moving due to pressure in the front of it and the next chuff is from that end of that cylinder, which is the cycle starting all over again.

You will note that the pistons do not move in the same direction all of the time, nor do they move in opposite directions all of the time.  When one piston is just starting to move one direction the other piston is in the middle of its travel in the same direction.  When the 2nd one reaches the end of its travel and reverses direction the first one is in the middle of its travel.  When the 1st one is reaching the end of its travel, the 2nd one is again in the middle of its travel but in the opposite direction. So half the time they are traveling in the same direction and half the time they are traveling in the opposite directions.

Anyway, it is the release of the "used" steam up the chimney that creates the CHUFF sound.  When the throttle is open all the way to get the train moving is when the chuff is loudest.  Once the train is moving, the  throttle is closed a small amount (or more importantly the valve gear that times letting the steam into the cylinder and letting it out is changed to let less steam in) then the chuffing quiets down.  Thus starting the train, acceleration or working up a hill makes louder chuffs than when just holding speed, and the chuffing can almost go away when slowing down.

There is a lot more to this, but it takes huge books to explain it all and the various differences that have been invented to make the locomotive more effecient or easier to maintain.

if you really, really want to understand all of this and like to read, I recommend the book "The Locomotive Up To Date" by Chas McShane.  Get the 1909 edition!  There are a couple of publishers that have reprinted it and it is not too expensive, but it contains some really good explanations.  There are some more modern books, but the McShane book is a classic and can hardly be outdone. 

This is one of the best posts that I have read in Train's forums.  I am not an engineer, but I am able to understand what you have said.  Also, many of the responses are equally informative.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Norfolk Southern Lafayette District
  • 1,642 posts
Posted by bubbajustin on Wednesday, April 25, 2012 8:48 AM

Semper Vaporo

Today, we think that "high tech" is computers, but "back in the day" these machines were every bit as High Tech as today's computers.  They were anything BUT "simple".  There were all kinds of intricate technology developed and built into the machines to make them work as effeciently as possible.

The only difference between now and then is that today you need a massive scanning electron microscope to see the parts, and back then it took massive cranes and jacks to pick up the parts to see them.

 

So true!

 

So the Y6's had massive low pressure cylinders on the front end of the boiler, up by the pilot truck, and had smaller high pressure cylinders back closest to the cab?

So the way I take it, steam from the steam dome was sent to the, small,  high pressure cylenders first, and once it went through it's two stroke cycle adn became cooler and more expanded, then it was piped up to the massive low pressure cylinders to be used again beofre being sent up through the blast pipe and out the stack? I would imagine that the draft comming through the flue tube was massive with all that steam being exhausted! That make a lot of sense actually.

And in simple mode, steam was directly fed from the steam dome to both the high pressure and the low pressure cylinders at the same time. This, in turn, made the locomotive seem louder that it would have been in compund mode.... Lightbulb Moment!!!IdeaIdeaIdeaSurpriseSurprise

Very interesting indeed!

Makes me appreciate these mamoth machines even more.

-Justin

The road to to success is always under construction. _____________________________________________________________________________ When the going gets tough, the tough use duct tape.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Norfolk Southern Lafayette District
  • 1,642 posts
Posted by bubbajustin on Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:30 AM

Thanks to all for the stellare explanation of the "Chuff"! Glad to know much much more about how these great machines worked! Yes

 

-Justin

The road to to success is always under construction. _____________________________________________________________________________ When the going gets tough, the tough use duct tape.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Wednesday, April 18, 2012 12:42 AM

There seems to be a bit of confusion about when and how Mallets shifted from simple to compound operation.  To (hopefully) clarify:

Starting from a dead stop, the locomotive was in simple mode.  The high pressure cylinders got steam from the boiler at full pressure and exhausted to the atmosphere through the blast pipe.  The low pressure cylinders had steam fed through a reducing valve to keep them from slipping the drivers, and exhausted to the atmosphere.

At some relatively low speed, the high pressure cylinder exhaust would be diverted to the receiver, and thence to the low pressure cylinders, by the intercepting valve.  This happened automatically.  (The major difference between the Y6b and earlier Mallets was that the interceptor valve wouldn't go to compound mode until the locomotive reached 10MPH, and would revert to simple if the speed dropped below 10MPH.  Earlier Ys changed over at 4MPH.)

When running in compound mode the engineer could give the low pressure cylinders a shot of reduced-pressure boiler steam by using a valve which was controlled manually.  This came standard on the Y6b, and was retrofitted to earlier locos as they went through the shops.

That long treatise from 1914 referenced earlier ended with the two design features that soured the Santa Fe on articulateds - the jointed boilers.  They were maintenance nightmares, prone to problems.  All of Santa Fe's jointed-boiler articulateds were rebuilt into normal 2-cylinder rigid-frame locos by 1916.  The next articulateds to carry Santa Fe numbers were the Y3s purchased from the N&W during WWII.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - with one articulated that never ran there)

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, April 16, 2012 1:45 PM

....The mechanical engineering age, vs the electronic engineering age.

All one has to do {that has an interest, and a bit of knowledge of what is happening}, just observe one of these steam brutes pass by with all the rotating parts, and cams, 200 tons of mechanical parts that have to work together....and reliably so, to really "see" the marvel in these machines.....and of course, someone with knowledge how to make it work {best}, for him....{or her}.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Monday, April 16, 2012 10:43 AM

Today, we think that "high tech" is computers, but "back in the day" these machines were every bit as High Tech as today's computers.  They were anything BUT "simple".  There were all kinds of intricate technology developed and built into the machines to make them work as effeciently as possible.

The only difference between now and then is that today you need a massive scanning electron microscope to see the parts, and back then it took massive cranes and jacks to pick up the parts to see them.

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, April 16, 2012 9:57 AM

.....Thanks fellows.  Seems I opened up a subject that requires quite a bit of studying, and understanding just what the capability of these brutes were.

I never realized they could be fed steam in two different ways before these conversations.

Can't right now, but we'll study what is here to see, and I'm sure we'll understand a bit better what really was possible with these engines.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,019 posts
Posted by BigJim on Monday, April 16, 2012 8:49 AM

erikem

Quentin,

My understanding is that the Y-6b's were always in compound - i.e. the exhaust from the high pressure cylinders went to the low pressure cylinders. To get extra tractive effort, some high pressure steam was admitted to the piping between the high pressure and low pressure cylinders to increase the pressure being admitted to the low pressure cylinders which then increased he tractive effort.

- Erik


No, the Y6b was just like all of the others. They could be simpled if the need arised.

If you have read the information in the link I provided above, you will see that the reducing valve was originally located in the high pressure cylinder saddle. This caused some maintainence problems in that the valve needed to be kept well oiled for proper operation.

In the early 1950's, the N&W developed the external reducing / booster valve (seen as a round cylinder above the right side high pressure cylinder) to help solve the maintainence problems. This brought the reducing valve to a more accessible location and added the benifit of the ability, while working in compound, to add a small amount of superheated steam to the reciever going to the low pressure cylinders. While this added a small amount of steam pressure the bigger difference in power was gained from the amount of heat this added to the exhaust steam from the high pressure cylinders. 

It was found that the extra power caused the front engine to slip, so lead was poured into the front frame to gain the weight needed to stem the slipping.

If the train could not be started or was about to stall while moving in "Compound", then the engineer could "Simple" the engine. Simple operation could be used up to around 10mph. Working in compound the "booster" valve could be opened for more power up to around 15mph.

The external reducing valve worked well and all of the Y5, Y6 Y6a & Y6b classes were fitted with them. All of these were then rated the same. The N&W then refered to them as "Improved Y5/Y6".

.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 445 posts
Posted by Kootenay Central on Sunday, April 15, 2012 11:57 PM
."

 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/imlsdcc/5020620389/sizes/z/in/photostream/

This flickr photo is fasinating, I've never seen a cylinder set up like this one on this; A TANDEM Compound configuration on this CPR Locomotive.

[/quote] Thank You for activating the links! There were changes to the system a while back. I tried several hints from the Forums to get the links to work from this end, but, to no avail. ONLY the 778 is a CPR locomotive. The Tandem Compound is another road's. I understand Santa Fe had Tandem Compounds. I do not have a CP steam roster here, but, I understand that many of their Compounds, regardless of 'System' of Compounding were later superheated and rebuilt to straight simple locomotives, several lasting until the Diesels came. Others were never rebuilt and went directly to scrap, the last operating as a Compound c. 1928. The Depression eliminated many old locomotives no longer required. Thank You.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Cardiff, CA
  • 2,930 posts
Posted by erikem on Sunday, April 15, 2012 11:10 PM

Quentin,

My understanding is that the Y-6b's were always in compound - i.e. the exhaust from the high pressure cylinders went to the low pressure cylinders. To get extra tractive effort, some high pressure steam was admitted to the piping between the high pressure and low pressure cylinders to increase the pressure being admitted to the low pressure cylinders which then increased he tractive effort.

- Erik

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, April 15, 2012 9:37 PM

.....That's a lot of homework....But we'll get to it and work on it.  Thanks.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,019 posts
Posted by BigJim on Sunday, April 15, 2012 9:33 PM

Read the following and learn something:

http://www.catskillarchive.com/rrextra/mallet.Html

.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, April 15, 2012 6:19 PM

.....And again, {Paul}, that certainly makes sense.  I wonder if it was possible to switch back to "compound" then....after the load was under way in moving.  On the other hand....doesn't seem that would have been any help in "power"....Just economy, so to speak.

Now, I'm starting to wonder where the advantage might have been to have available the two different modes of control....It almost sounds to me the only advantage to reverting back to compound...would be the less use of steam / fuel...water......

Understand powering the large cylinders at start up, and doing so thru some kind of steam supply orfice....so I really don't see any "power" advantage to this compound / simple control......

Makes one think though....

Quentin

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Sunday, April 15, 2012 6:17 PM

Thanks for sharing the two links, Kootenay Central. I had never have seen anything(maybe never noticed anything) quite like these two classes of Locomotives.

http://members.shaw.ca/cprsteam/m2.htm

FTL: "...the Richmond or cross-compound system, was particularly adaptable to freight locomotives such as No. 778. In the Richmond system, the high-pressure cylinder was placed on the right-hand side of the locomotive, with the low-pressure cylinder in corresponding place on the opposite side. The illustration above shows this arrangement clearly, the much larger low-pressure cylinder, with an inside diameter of 35", appearing prominently in the foreground. The diameter of the high-pressure cylinder was only 22"; both, of course, had the same stroke: 26"..."

 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/imlsdcc/5020620389/sizes/z/in/photostream/

This flickr photo is fasinating, I've never seen a cylinder set up like this one on this; A TANDEM Compound configuration on this CPR Locomotive.

 

 


 

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Sunday, April 15, 2012 2:13 PM

   A couple of comments on what I've read about mallets:   To start, you almost had to be in simple mode since only one engine would be working.   The low pressure cylinders ran off the exhaust from the high pressure engine, so if you were just starting, there was nothing to feed the low pressure engine in compound mode.   

    In simple mode, the steam being fed to the low pressure cylinders was run through a pressure-reducing valve or regulator first.   If you ran full pressure to the those big cylinders, they would exert much more force than the high pressure cylinders so that you would not get much effort from the smaller cylinders before the big ones would slip.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 445 posts
Posted by Kootenay Central on Sunday, April 15, 2012 10:03 AM
Image of CP two-cylinder Compound locomotive. The large low-pressure cylinder is obvious on the locomotive's left side. http://members.shaw.ca/cprsteam/m2.htm Here is a Tandem Compound locomotive with BOTH high and low pressure cylinders on the same piston rods on each side. http://www.flickr.com/photos/imlsdcc/5020620389/sizes/o/in/photostream/ Thank You.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, April 15, 2012 6:25 AM

.....Oh what history...!  Never heard anyone comment of such an engine before.  Wonder if "Google can produce a photo"....? 

Quentin

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 445 posts
Posted by Kootenay Central on Sunday, April 15, 2012 3:26 AM
Interesting Data.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Saturday, April 14, 2012 9:37 PM

.....Thankyou { CZ}, for that interesting, and comprehensive answer....What you say of the designs and operating sure makes sense to me.

Quentin

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,264 posts
Posted by CAZEPHYR on Saturday, April 14, 2012 9:23 PM

The N&W perfected the Compound locomotive and made many changes over the first version that was designed by the USRA.   The Y6a and Y6B had a valve or control that the engineer could start a train in Simple mode for extra tractive effort.  The N&W designed this control valve which was not used on any other compound locomotive that I am aware of.     The Y6a and Y6b had a traffic effort listing of 152,206 in simple and 126,838 in compound.   Traffic effort was always calculated on steam presure along with piston force and in the case of the larger 39" cylinders with the boiler presure, the traffic effort was much greater.  You also have to realize that on poor or wet rail, this extra force might not be so useful at times.  I know the engineers tended to use them in simple mode for switching out coal at mines since the engine would respond better than waiting for the steam to exit the high presure cylinders and start towards the low presure cylinder for extra force.  With the locomotive in simple mode, you got response when the thottle was yanked.   And you are correct about switching to compound for normal running and saving steam for a coal savings also.  

 

I would have to make a guess about running in simple at higher speeds, but this would probably had caused a lot of rail pounding since the large cylinders would be exerting way too much force and would overcome the normal counter balancing.  These engines were designed to run in compound once the train was underway on the road.     

I know the Y6b had the SA feedwater system and the Y6a had some other type, but most of the rest of the details were common to the Y6a.  Both were equal in the traffic effort tables and both were very capable locomotives.   The one at St. Louis museum is a Y6a if I remember correctly.

CZ

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Saturday, April 14, 2012 6:09 PM

Question:  Am I to understand the Mallet's such as the Y6's with the two different size cylinders....are capable of running in "compound mode", and also run in "simple mode"....?

And what is the difference between the Y6a and b class....?

If both "modes" are available in the Y6's....how is the different size pistons dealt with when running in "simple mode"....?  Does that cause slipping problems....?

If it is possible to run both or at least one of the above class engines in both "modes", that would seem to be an advantage for starting power, and then switch to compound mode for running...and perhaps use less steam....

Any comments on this...?

Quentin

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy