Trains.com

Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 68

5222 views
51 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 68
Posted by Bergie on Monday, March 26, 2007 1:52 PM
I just posted the latest installment of Trackside with Erik and Mike in our new section within the Railroad Reference area of TrainsMag.com. 

Read Trackside with Erik and Mike Volume 68

Voting for Trackside with Erik and Mike now occures at the top of the Trackside with Erik and Mike section. Click here to vote.

Please add your comments regarding this week's photos here.

Thanks, Erik

Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, March 26, 2007 2:30 PM

 

....My vote is with Mikes.  Strange reason.  I equate both photos equal as quality from the photographer.  Obviously similar type of settings and compositions.

Have to make my judgement from the content. In this case, that is the railroad equipment....The equipment in Erik's photo looks more unkempt, crapy....Mike's, brighter colors, etc...

One unrelated photo question:  Seems strange, tank cars connected right to the power...Maybe they are not fuel carrying tanks.  Just thought that was not done where it could be avoided.

Quentin

  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Milwaukee, WI, US
  • 1,384 posts
Posted by fuzzybroken on Monday, March 26, 2007 3:14 PM

I must have been #9 to vote -- probably the highest I've ever voted!  And I tipped the scales in Erik's favor... Wink [;)]  I liked Erik's shot better, since it is something that we won't see anymore, as SOO 6004 is no longer on the roster.  I just like the rare and/or endangered stuff, I guess.

I was kinda wondering why I didn't see Mike yesterday...Wink [;)]

-Fuzzy Fuzzy World 3
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Monday, March 26, 2007 3:15 PM

Another difficult choice!

I like the uniqueness of Erik's shot; two units of SOO power, mis-matched number boards on the lead unit; but most of the train seems a bit out-of-focus to me, and the overhead wires and tower are a bit of a distraction.

Mike's image of the "one-unit wonder", all nice and clean, with enough snow on the pilot and walkways for effect, made for a sharp photo. 

 

Mike gets the vote this week.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Monday, March 26, 2007 3:17 PM
 fuzzybroken wrote:

I must have been #9 to vote -- probably the highest I've ever voted!  And I tipped the scales in Erik's favor... Wink [;)] 

50/50 when after I voted.

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • 39 posts
Posted by cpprfld on Monday, March 26, 2007 3:23 PM
I went with Mike's photo this time. It was difficult to choose, because both photos were so similar. I liked Mike's photo better because of the sharpness of the color of the locomotive.
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Reedsburg WI (near Wisconsin Dells)
  • 3,370 posts
Posted by Noah Hofrichter on Monday, March 26, 2007 4:01 PM

Both shots were really good this week guys! I had a hard time deciding. In the end I went with Erik's. Between the sweet light, the awesome power, and with a little more telemash just seemed like the best to me. It was definately a tough decision though!

Noah

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Monday, March 26, 2007 4:12 PM
Well, I put the Jinx on Mike, by voting for his CP shot over Bergie's SOO SD60 shot, decided by the time honored Vermont Quarter method. Mike's shot was a bit better, but I'll do my damage..Sign - Oops [#oops] and vote for Mike's shot. We did not get anywhere near 80 in Mudville, USA, but 60 sure was an improvement on what we're gonna get this coming weekend, when winter is supposed to return Disapprove [V]Angry [:(!]
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 18 posts
It's the small things that make a difference
Posted by UnionPacificVic on Monday, March 26, 2007 5:35 PM

Two standard loco mug shots.   So how do you vote?  What seperates these two pictures?  I voted for the picture with the little extras in it-- Bergies.  What is that "mist" emenating from the side of the train?  Is it snow being slung up?  Is it steam?  Or in a "harken to the past" moment, is it brake shoe smoke?  Whatever it is, it lends character to and otherwise standard approach shot.  That, and the beat up SOO grinder leading the way.  That little extra and the lighting difference is really all that seperates these two otherwise fairly standard photos. 

"Did you see what I did?"

  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Turner Junction
  • 3,076 posts
Posted by CopCarSS on Monday, March 26, 2007 5:50 PM

Difficult vote this week. Two very similar shots.

Advantage Mike: The image looks a bit sharper. There's less clutter (Power Lines, etc.) Little bit more of a wintery feel.

Advantage Erik: That delicious late evening light.

Since photography literally translates from Greek as "Light Writing," my vote has to go to the nice warm light of Erik's shot. Just my personal preference as a "Golden Hour" photo chaser.

-Chris
West Chicago, IL
Christopher May Fine Art Photography

"In wisdom gathered over time I have found that every experience is a form of exploration." ~Ansel Adams

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: BNSF NM Division (ABQ)
  • 39 posts
On Trackside Vol 68
Posted by asnjoe24 on Monday, March 26, 2007 6:23 PM

It was a really tough choice for me this week; both have some characteristics that really caught my eye, so I had to weigh them by how much they had before I reached my final decision of Mike's. Though the day that Mike's CP photo looks clear, there seems to be almost a pale blue shade to the photo that brings on a cold, winter mood, contrasted with the light patches of snow on the ground that suggest a spring thaw. That's what won me over.

Erik's Soo Line photo also grabs me for a few reasons: 1.) the Soo Line engines are worn and give the impression of their seeing a long haul, 2.) the consist is autocarrier, and autocarrier cars are the most common thing I see sitting in the ABQ yard in my area, and 3.) the trail of blowing snow, mist, brake smoke, or whatever it is that is being blown up by the train, giving it the appearance of emergence from mist. That effect is really awesome, and was the first thing that caught my attention in Erik's shot, making it a great one.

- Bryan

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Centennial, CO
  • 82 posts
Posted by Rocket Man on Monday, March 26, 2007 7:10 PM
Real Estate = Location, Location, Location
Photography = Lighting, Lighting, Lighting
Winner = Erik, Erik, Erik
The Rock Island Line is a mighty fine line...
  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Northwest Washington State
  • 58 posts
Posted by gemotor on Monday, March 26, 2007 7:18 PM
Well, much as I normally like the long, warm light of late afternoon, the power lines pretty much spoiled it for me in Erik's photo.  The composition of Mike's photo is right on!  A bit of winter trees in the background to set off the crisp focus on the locomotive - check it out under high magnification, the locomotive appears three-dimensional against those trees.  Shows ya what selective focus can do.  In fact, the greater the magnification, the better this image looks.  The thumbnail looked just too contrasty and blue, but two steps bigger, really nice.  Good work, both of you.  I'll be looking forward to spring as much as you. 
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 26, 2007 7:45 PM
Sorry guys, didnt cast a vote this time as neither shot did much for me. Composition wise they were equal.  Seen these types of shot time after time after time after time ad infinium
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • 19 posts
Posted by gapotter09 on Monday, March 26, 2007 8:35 PM

I must agree...Mike took a big chance in getting this picture with those tank cars directly behind the locomotive.  Where were the Auditors for OSHA ?? Whatever happened to the

normal operating rules.

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 115 posts
Posted by lhtalbot on Monday, March 26, 2007 9:15 PM

Both shots seem to be the same, so I had to use some other criteria to vote.

I went with the poor little SOO engine, beat up & raggedy, even the numbers are make-shift (is that an upside-down 9?) No new paint job, just doing it's best day after day...............

OMG! What an I saying???? I HAVE gone insane, & didn't realize it until now????

Larry in Wauwatosa

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Amherst, MA
  • 6 posts
Posted by pawbase on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 4:48 AM
I couldn't resist that Gleaming Engine!!
PAW
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 5:59 AM
 Yawn..

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: MRL 3rd Sub MP117 "No defects, repeat, no defects"
  • 360 posts
Posted by ValorStorm on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 6:25 AM
Chose Erik's. They're both very similar photos, except that in Erik's pic the train looks like it's bursting into the sunlight. The train in Mike's...isn't.
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Long Island
  • 121 posts
Posted by mandelswamp on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 7:52 AM
At first, I was leaning toward Mike's photo because his had a nice new shiny locomotive in it and Erik's engine looked rather drab.  However, I took one more close look at both and decided that Erik's photo featured a closer view of the train and in my opinion, a more dynamic shot than Mike's.  So Erik won my vote this time.  Mike, I hope you have a wonderful vacation and bring back lots of interesting photos to share with us in future editions fo Trackside with Erik and Mike.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
Posted by Bergie on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:26 AM

 Mookie wrote:
 Yawn..

It's a good thing I'm not petty. If I were, I would be tempted to move over to the coffee shop and give your posts the same treatment.

Angry [:(!] Bergie

Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 9:06 AM
Mr. Bergie it seems like you heard what I said last time, not that it mattered all that much in the scheme of things.  The power you have is unique and your shot has the 'little things' that make pictures stand out.  You've got the beat up older units still giving their all, a sense of power emanating from the exhaust plume coming from the engines, and a sense of speed from the powder/snow/whatever being kicked up by the train.  To sum that up it's a railroad at work, working hard.  I like that picture.  That being said I usually go for widenose power as it's a favorite of mine, but yours Erik gets my vote.  Nice shot!  Smile [:)]

Dan

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 10:28 AM
 Bergie wrote:

 Mookie wrote:
 Yawn..

It's a good thing I'm not petty. If I were, I would be tempted to move over to the coffee shop and give your posts the same treatment.

Angry [:(!] Bergie

I apologize if I upset you.  Let's just say I don't care for either one this week.

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Omaha, Nebraska
  • 1,920 posts
Posted by Willy2 on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:03 AM
 Mookie wrote:
 Bergie wrote:

 Mookie wrote:
 Yawn..

It's a good thing I'm not petty. If I were, I would be tempted to move over to the coffee shop and give your posts the same treatment.

Angry [:(!] Bergie

I apologize if I upset you.  Let's just say I don't care for either one this week.

Mookie

Yikes!

I decided to go with Mike's photo this time around. I liked the nice clean power on the point rather than the older locomotives in Erik's pic. However, I thought both photos were almost equal in quality and it was a really hard choice.

Some people have mentioned that the power lines in Erik's photo decrease its quality, but I don't see why the power lines in Erik's shot take anything away from the photo. In fact, I didn't even notice them until I looked at the photo a second time. Details, details, I guess.

Willy

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Kearney, MO.
  • 5 posts
Posted by TrackTalk 1 on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:13 AM

This is the first time that I've responded in the comments section of the contest.  While each shot has it's own unique charitstics they both share the same type of compostion.  I voted for Eriks photo because it reminds me so much of what everyday railroading is all about.

The semetry of the jointed rail, the workaday locomotives in run 8 lashed together only because they are the horsepower needed, the trail of light snow kicked up by the movement of the train, the low late winter but warming lighting, the late winter leaveless trees, the crew attentive to their task and how the sum of all the parts come together to represent everyday railroading.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
Posted by Bergie on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:21 AM
 TrackTalk 1 wrote:

This is the first time that I've responded in the comments section of the contest.  While each shot has it's own unique charitstics they both share the same type of compostion.  I voted for Eriks photo because it reminds me so much of what everyday railroading is all about.

The semetry of the jointed rail, the workaday locomotives in run 8 lashed together only because they are the horsepower needed, the trail of light snow kicked up by the movement of the train, the low late winter but warming lighting, the late winter leaveless trees, the crew attentive to their task and how the sum of all the parts come together to represent everyday railroading.

 

Thanks for joining the conversation, TrackTalk1. Welcome!

Bergie

Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: PACIFIC NORTHWEST
  • 118 posts
Posted by LVJJJ on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:36 AM

voted for Erik, more train less landscape (seems happier too), what power lines?, also prefer EMD.  Whatever happened to the 6000 hp units EMD & GE were supposed to build, since Mike's shot is of an ES44AC?  Larry of the North

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:59 PM
 Mookie wrote:
 Bergie wrote:

 Mookie wrote:
 Yawn..

It's a good thing I'm not petty. If I were, I would be tempted to move over to the coffee shop and give your posts the same treatment.

Angry [:(!] Bergie

I apologize if I upset you.  Let's just say I don't care for either one this week.

Mookie

Gee, I'm glad I didn't catch any flak for my non-committal response in the last contest...

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Columbus NC
  • 45 posts
Posted by Chris Owens on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:59 PM
I really enjoyed Mikes photo.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: The Beautiful North Georgia Mountians
  • 2,362 posts
Posted by Railfan1 on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:13 PM

I went with Erik's this time. For some reason I find it interesting to see locomotives with mis-matched number boards. It was a tuff choice yet again.  Keep up the great work.

"It's a great day to be alive" "Of all the words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these, It might have been......"

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy