Trains.com

Fire damaging Sacramento tressle

4979 views
63 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • 71 posts
Fire damaging Sacramento tressle
Posted by jpwoodruff on Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:46 PM

Just this minute TV is showing a 2-track tressle afire in Sacramento.

I'm not able to give any technical data, except that I did not see a train, and did see timber burning and destroying two tracks.

Sorry to bring bad news.

John 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:53 PM

 

.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Marengo, IL
  • 335 posts
Posted by Krazykat112079 on Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:59 PM
I have to say, some of those shots that have the entire trestle wreathed in flames are impressive.  Anyone know which railroad owned that trestle?
Nathaniel
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Sacramento, California
  • 420 posts
Posted by SactoGuy188 on Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:03 PM

 Krazykat112079 wrote:
I have to say, some of those shots that have the entire trestle wreathed in flames are impressive.  Anyone know which railroad owned that trestle?

That trestle is the part of the Southern Pacific Cal-P mainline between Roseville, CA and Oakland, CA. This could be really bad for UP, since that bridge has around 50 trains a day pass through it. I would not be surprised that UP completely rebuilds that trestle and the line will be out of service for at minimum two weeks.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:08 PM
 SactoGuy188 wrote:

 Krazykat112079 wrote:
I have to say, some of those shots that have the entire trestle wreathed in flames are impressive.  Anyone know which railroad owned that trestle?

That trestle is the part of the Southern Pacific Cal-P mainline between Roseville, CA and Oakland, CA. This could be really bad for UP, since that bridge has around 50 trains a day pass through it. I would not be surprised that UP completely rebuilds that trestle and the line will be out of service for at minimum two weeks.

Sees a lot of Amtrak use as well.

dd

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Sacramento, California
  • 420 posts
Posted by SactoGuy188 on Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:15 PM
 dldance wrote:

Sees a lot of Amtrak use as well.

dd

That line is part of the SP Overland transcontinental route and also part of the I-5 north-south route. It could have very serious effects on railroad traffic in California until the bridge is rebuilt.

 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:29 PM

 

....I agree, railroads seem to have the ability to rebuild structures in such quick time...There will be a flood of activity probably before the hot spots cool down.  Somebody {Complete crew}, is already in the planning and executing stage to start the work.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:42 PM
This is a main artery into the bay area.
Its out side of Sacramento, so it will be hard to reroute trains, unless their sent south a bit and brought in near fremont or somewhere over there. This will kill rail traffic into the bay for a while.
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Sacramento, California
  • 420 posts
Posted by SactoGuy188 on Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:11 PM

 the feed wrote:
This is a main artery into the bay area.
Its out side of Sacramento, so it will be hard to reroute trains, unless their sent south a bit and brought in near fremont or somewhere over there. This will kill rail traffic into the bay for a while.

Fortunately, UP can still route the north-south trains using the former Western Pacific tracks through downtown Sacramento for now. Mind you, that could result in a lot of traffic delays through downtown as train traffic increases dramatically.... 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 459 posts
Posted by jclass on Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:29 PM
Would they create a fill instead of reconstructing the trestle?
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • 53 posts
Posted by hrbdizzle on Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:43 PM
Hey all im new here, im a conductor for UP I currently work on the mountain and the canyon. Im telling you that this is going to be a major hamper on freight. someone said above that they can re route through sacramento, on the sacramento sub. Fine and dandy, but the Sac sub is out of service. There is no rail road ties at all, south west of this. No way for freight to head to oakland, and no freight running south to fresno.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,422 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:41 PM

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Mt. Fuji
  • 1,840 posts
Posted by Datafever on Friday, March 16, 2007 12:12 AM
"I'm sittin' in a railway station, Got a ticket for my destination..."
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Mt. Fuji
  • 1,840 posts
Posted by Datafever on Friday, March 16, 2007 12:22 AM
"I'm sittin' in a railway station, Got a ticket for my destination..."
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Friday, March 16, 2007 12:45 AM

Now if I had a wooden structure that important, I'd put a fire supression/alarm system on it.

We've got some firefighters on this board.  What'cha Think!  Sprinkler System?

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 16, 2007 1:31 AM
Like I've said before - Dispersed Redundancy is the best insurance policy when the cost of delays exceeds the cost of structural repair.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Phoenix, Arizona
  • 1,989 posts
Posted by canazar on Friday, March 16, 2007 3:07 AM
U just watched a news cast, via the internet site.  I am guessin it was a 9 or 10 pm show.  The news anchor commented that UP all ready had crews there waiting to get the word from the Fire Department t go.   No word yet how it got started....  

Best Regards, Big John

Kiva Valley Railway- Freelanced road in central Arizona.  Visit the link to see my MR forum thread on The Building of the Whitton Branch on the  Kiva Valley Railway

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,505 posts
Posted by caldreamer on Friday, March 16, 2007 3:36 AM
I disagree with hrbdizzie, The WP Feather river canyon route comes down through Oroville, to Richmond.  There has to be an interchange with UP (SP) at Richmond, since they came into there also.  Then down th SP tracks to Oakland.  Also SP ran up through Marysville/Yuba City and through Oroville. There has to be a way to interchange somwhere along that route.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 32.8
  • 769 posts
Posted by Kevin C. Smith on Friday, March 16, 2007 3:54 AM
 SactoGuy188 wrote:
 dldance wrote:

Sees a lot of Amtrak use as well.

dd

That line is part of the SP Overland transcontinental route and also part of the I-5 north-south route. It could have very serious effects on railroad traffic in California until the bridge is rebuilt.

 

Urgh...I'm due through on the CZ on the 26th of next month. While I'm sure UP has no choice but to have it fixed well before then I'm glad my annual vacations moved from the end of March a few years ago. I'd be getting a call from Julie telling me of who knows what alternate arrangements.

"Look at those high cars roll-finest sight in the world."
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • 53 posts
Posted by hrbdizzle on Friday, March 16, 2007 4:16 AM
 igoldberg wrote:
I disagree with hrbdizzie, The WP Feather river canyon route comes down through Oroville, to Richmond.  There has to be an interchange with UP (SP) at Richmond, since they came into there also.  Then down th SP tracks to Oakland.  Also SP ran up through Marysville/Yuba City and through Oroville. There has to be a way to interchange somwhere along that route.


your correct, somewhat. coming that way from Oroville down the Sacramento sub, they can take a right hand turn and head to oakland. or Left to Elvas Wye. But to continue down the WP Sac sub, is not an option it out of service From all the way to stockton. From Sacramento.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 24 posts
Posted by stanames on Friday, March 16, 2007 5:38 AM

Is not there also an interchange track north of the river to allow Feather River trains to enter Rosville yard.  While I am sure this track is not meant for heavy traffic could it not be used during the next few weeks to help clear traffic?

 

Stan

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Friday, March 16, 2007 8:30 AM

There is always the old WPRR Feather River route as a alternative until the UPRR rebuilds it

Here is another link

http://www.ktvu.com/news/11265818/detail.html

 

 SactoGuy188 wrote:

 Krazykat112079 wrote:
I have to say, some of those shots that have the entire trestle wreathed in flames are impressive.  Anyone know which railroad owned that trestle?

That trestle is the part of the Southern Pacific Cal-P mainline between Roseville, CA and Oakland, CA. This could be really bad for UP, since that bridge has around 50 trains a day pass through it. I would not be surprised that UP completely rebuilds that trestle and the line will be out of service for at minimum two weeks.

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Friday, March 16, 2007 9:24 AM
Now that we have them rerouted - who gets to pay for the restoration?  Will it all be UP or will the county share in the cost? 

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Friday, March 16, 2007 11:11 AM

UP Could have at least one 300 foot precast concrete on steel piling bridge in place by Monday morning with the other complete by Wednesday. They probably have people, pile drivers, surfacing & track gangs, yellow and the replacement bridge pieces already en-route. The bigger delay problem is going to be dealing with the environmental regulatory wackos in CA that already have been well documented as being out of control with their own agenda. (They could care less that passenger and freight users will be inconvenienced in their narrow view of the world)

Mooks: Uncle Pete buys the bridge unless a culpable party is found.(Sharon Springs , KS revisited)

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Mt. Fuji
  • 1,840 posts
Posted by Datafever on Friday, March 16, 2007 11:21 AM
Mookie - UP could very well get billed for the emergency response too.
"I'm sittin' in a railway station, Got a ticket for my destination..."
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Midtown Sacramento
  • 3,340 posts
Posted by Jetrock on Friday, March 16, 2007 11:33 AM

The trestle is actually within the city limits of Sacramento--the American River parkway floods every year, so it looks like open countryside but it is surrounded by city on both sides. Because it floods regularly, it would be unlikely to get replaced by fill, so we'll most likely get a concrete trestle.


Rough week for that neck of the woods: the old interlocking tower at Elvas Junction is due to be razed soon, if it hasn't been done already.

 

The plume of smoke looked pretty amazing--I was driving home from work and caught a shot on my digital camera:

One thing I am almost kind of hoping for: While it is relatively easy to use a bus bridge for Capitol Corridor passengers east of Sacramento, there is perhaps an off-hand chance that the California Zephyr will get temporarily rerouted north on the old WP mainline, up through its original route through the Feather River Canyon. There is precedent for this: when UP does tunnel work in Colorado, they reroute the CZ through Wyoming on the original Union Pacific transcontinental route. If they do, I might just have to schedule a weekend trip to Reno and bring a whole lot of film!

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Southeastern CO
  • 13 posts
Posted by jedi_tev on Friday, March 16, 2007 1:18 PM

 hrbdizzle wrote:
Hey all im new here, im a conductor for UP I currently work on the mountain and the canyon. Im telling you that this is going to be a major hamper on freight. someone said above that they can re route through sacramento, on the sacramento sub. Fine and dandy, but the Sac sub is out of service. There is no rail road ties at all, south west of this. No way for freight to head to oakland, and no freight running south to fresno.

I'm a former Amtrak Conductor, are you saying there are no ties north of Haggin? I thought that was the line the Coast Starlight uses, if that part of it is still in service, they can run trains up to Marysville and then back down and there is a wye at Haggin, the trains can continue over to Evlas and south. 

 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Friday, March 16, 2007 1:47 PM

 

....I'm interested to see how soon the UP folks can get train traffic on their new {soon to be built}, trestle.

Noted last evening on one of the news films....Fireman were at the leading edge off the trestle to the steel sections of the bridge structures playing hoses on the stubburn fire trying to get on the wood ties of the steel structures...It looked like they were going to get that stopped.

Quentin

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,026 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, March 16, 2007 6:00 PM
 greyhounds wrote:

Now if I had a wooden structure that important, I'd put a fire supression/alarm system on it.

We've got some firefighters on this board.  What'cha Think!  Sprinkler System?

And one heck of a pump. 

NFPA guideline for fire flow:  Length times width, divided by three, times number of floors involved.

1000 foot structure, 20 feet high (two stories), 20 feet wide.  13,000 gpm for the whole thing. 

But, the idea of sprinklers is to catch it early, so we don't need that much water.  But that is a lot of pipe to maintain, as well as having some form of nozzles.  It either has to be pressurized all the time, or you've got to have a ready supply of water.

Short answer - probably cheaper in the long run to rebuild than to maintain against a once in 50 years event.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Friday, March 16, 2007 6:57 PM
You're right, Larry--and now it can be rebuilt with nary so much as a splinter of wood in it.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy