This is a photograph of the remains of Gary Indiana's NYC terminal. I wonder if any of you know whether this is still standing. It is basically an open ruin that was abandoned about 50 years ago. Despite being listed as a historically significant station, it is slowly weathering away in the elements. My understanding is that proposals have come and gone for restoration. I discovered this station on the Lost Indiana website some time ago, and have not been able to stave off my curiousity as to it's fate.
Nothing is more fairly distributed than common sense: no one thinks he needs more of it than he already has.
It was still there as of mid October 2006.
Bert
An "expensive model collector"
I remember catching the B&O "Diplomat" (not the original Washington-St. Louis train) at Gary for a short hop to Chicago Grand Central in 1969 and the station was already deteriorating at that time. It's in a poor location sandwiched between the Indiana Toll Road and the US Steel Gary Works so it's shielded from the view of just everybody except those passing through on the Toll Road.
....It really seems ashame to see America's structures such as pictured in above post rotting away....The sad fact time has passed it by for it's usefullness at it's location.
I'd wager if it's location was somewhere else it might have a chance of revival...Somewhere, where light rail is being redone, and or used as new transportation center...Believe location is critical to have "these types of buildings" revitilized and used in current society. It is sad to see them fall into complete ruin.
Quentin
Don't get me wrong, you are right about "America's ruins." But, I think this sadness is far overshadowed by the sadness that is Gary. I think there should be a study done as to how Gary went under and make it a prerequisite for every mayor to watch prior to taking office.
Gabe
gabe wrote: Don't get me wrong, you are right about "America's ruins." But, I think this sadness is far overshadowed by the sadness that is Gary. I think there should be a study done as to how Gary went under and make it a prerequisite for every mayor to watch prior to taking office.Gabe
Add Cairo Illinios to that list .
Actually, that is a Union Station, and at one time served both NYC and B&O in Gary. It was built of poured concrete, which may be part of the reason it appears to be so sound. Drive by it on the toll road, and you see only the upper (track-level) half, which really appears to be bombed out.
There was an article in the Chicago Tribune a few years back about resurrecting the station to serve as a gateway for something or other (trail access?) as well as a passenger station. I guess nothing came of that idea.
I concur with those folks who say that Gary is a sad-looking city now, in spite of some attempts to revitalize the downtown. (Another one whose downtown looks almost like a war zone is Benton Harbor, Michigan. And the old Michigan Central building in Detroit is tall enough to stand out in its location--it speaks volumes, unfortunately.)
Carl
Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)
CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)
Michigan Central looks much like the Buffalo Terminal....David Plowden, who has taken some of my favorite railroad photographs, has a book out on the theme of buildings in the heartland reverting to their natural state. It's called a Handful of Dust. The photo below is the Michigan Central ruin. Using my imagination, I could see it as a once bustling, noisy place full of activity.
http://davidplowden.com/
....It's scary.....There are too many examples of all we're talking about here in this thread across this great country of ours. I am not trying to be political in any way when I say: What can we start to do to reverse this situation....I am saying we have spent too much money around the world to 3rd world countries, and many other locations...I wish somehow, our elected officials could originate an ongoing discussion of America's problems of rotting cities...Not the blame game but a straight forward looking discussion of how we might revitlize some of the energy needed to redirect our thoughts and doings.....Surely we can do better. We're going to have to.
Modelcar wrote: What can we start to do to reverse this situation...
What can we start to do to reverse this situation...
Put people back to work. In jobs that pay more than a walmart greeter.
Instead of paying money to lower the cost of importing manufactured goods (deepening harbors , raising bridges, and making tunnels doublestack friendly, etc) we should be passing import tariffs that make local manufacturing look attractive by comparison.
As the greatest consumer economy on the planet, we can make out just servicing our own demand.
The hitch being that said tariffs would honk off a number of foreign countries that would reciprocate, and pass tariffs targeting the few big remaining american made exports. Which really boils down to large medical instruments, and a handful of other items. Which are big money for the few companies producing them
SO there are some decisions to be made. For instance would GE be happy building refrigerators in America once again, selling to American consumers, and give up on the idea of selling $6 milliion dollar MRI machines abroad?
Personally, I think a greater common good is served in so doing. Put a chicken back in every pot, instead of a turkey only in the pantry of GE stockholders
TheAntiGates wrote: Modelcar wrote: What can we start to do to reverse this situation... Put people back to work. In jobs that pay more than a walmart greeter.
Wouldn't the additional jobs that the DM&E expansion would create fall under your plan?
.....That's good.....The chicken and turkey part....! Like that.
n012944 wrote:Wouldn't the additional jobs that the DM&E expansion would create fall under your plan? Bert
Just how many jobs are GUARANTEED by the DME expansion ? Last I checked it was all being attributed to "trickle down effect?
What, 2 dozen miners for an extra shift and 30 more T&E guys to haul the coal? 50(+/-) jobs?
Any assumption that line side industry will immediately start to thrive, is just that. An assumption
TheAntiGates wrote: Modelcar wrote: What can we start to do to reverse this situation... Put people back to work. In jobs that pay more than a walmart greeter. Instead of paying money to lower the cost of importing manufactured goods (deepening harbors , raising bridges, and making tunnels doublestack friendly, etc) we should be passing import tariffs that make local manufacturing look attractive by comparison.As the greatest consumer economy on the planet, we can make out just servicing our own demand.The hitch being that said tariffs would honk off a number of foreign countries that would reciprocate, and pass tariffs targeting the few big remaining american made exports. Which really boils down to large medical instruments, and a handful of other items. Which are big money for the few companies producing themSO there are some decisions to be made. For instance would GE be happy building refrigerators in America once again, selling to American consumers, and give up on the idea of selling $6 milliion dollar MRI machines abroad? Personally, I think a greater common good is served in so doing. Put a chicken back in every pot, instead of a turkey only in the pantry of GE stockholders
As much as I have some issues with Henry Ford and his positions on matters, he was a genius, as far as I'm concerned in his understanding of economics. He paid his employees enough money so that they could buy his cars, putting more money back in his pocket.
Why do so few American companies try this method any more?
Erie Lackawanna wrote: TheAntiGates wrote: Modelcar wrote: What can we start to do to reverse this situation... Put people back to work. In jobs that pay more than a walmart greeter. As much as I have some issues with Henry Ford and his positions on matters, he was a genius, as far as I'm concerned in his understanding of economics. He paid his employees enough money so that they could buy his cars, putting more money back in his pocket.Why do so few American companies try this method any more?
Short sighted greed. Long range planning in Corporate America has become the year end report.
Paul
Have seen the Gary IN terminal from Amtrak before (Or was it South Shore?).
Seems to be quite a ways from the tracks themselves...
Now what about the old GT station in South Bend? South Bends Amshack is a real shame..
Erie Lackawanna wrote:As much as I have some issues with Henry Ford and his positions on matters, he was a genius, as far as I'm concerned in his understanding of economics. He paid his employees enough money so that they could buy his cars, putting more money back in his pocket.Why do so few American companies try this method any more?
Interesting that you would bring up that example, because the very same one occured to me as I was making the original post.
Tariffs have been (and still are) used against us, so it plexes me why we pretend to be so noble as to not use them.
There are only a handful of manufactured items that the US is still THE source for, and while they are big ticket items, the benefit of the sale goes to a relative minority.
Funny how someone earning a living soley off clipping coupons on their 50,000 shares of General Electric , can call american workers "lazy".
IRONROOSTER wrote: Erie Lackawanna wrote: TheAntiGates wrote: Modelcar wrote: What can we start to do to reverse this situation... Put people back to work. In jobs that pay more than a walmart greeter. As much as I have some issues with Henry Ford and his positions on matters, he was a genius, as far as I'm concerned in his understanding of economics. He paid his employees enough money so that they could buy his cars, putting more money back in his pocket.Why do so few American companies try this method any more?Short sighted greed. Long range planning in Corporate America has become the year end report.Paul
csx engineer
TheAntiGates wrote: n012944 wrote: Wouldn't the additional jobs that the DM&E expansion would create fall under your plan? Bert Just how many jobs are GUARANTEED by the DME expansion ? Last I checked it was all being attributed to "trickle down effect? What, 2 dozen miners for an extra shift and 30 more T&E guys to haul the coal? 50(+/-) jobs? Any assumption that line side industry will immediately start to thrive, is just that. An assumption
n012944 wrote: Wouldn't the additional jobs that the DM&E expansion would create fall under your plan? Bert
To be honest, DM&E won't add any jobs. It will only transfer jobs from one tranportation company to another. The coal or grain that moves now on UP, BNSF, or truck, will still move, even if there was no DM&E.
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
TheAntiGates wrote: Modelcar wrote: What can we start to do to reverse this situation...Put people back to work. In jobs that pay more than a walmart greeter.
Here we go again off the tracks (mandatory railroad reference to remain somewhat on topic).
OK, I'll play Devil's Advocate...
Fine. Better pay, then.
But in return, how about providing employers with potential employees who are qualified to do more than simple, basic manual labor? Employees who can speak English? That know how to do something as simple as count money accurately and make change? Or put the right order in the bag every time at the drive-up window at fast food joints? The ability to type into a business-specific software program?
Employees at the very least have to generate their salary for their employer so he can pay them. At the very least. That's how business works. Today, the U.S. does not have a very good record of this. Why should workers be the only ones "getting more?"
While workers may not always be offered the best salaries and benefits, they don't always offer a good package to the employer, either.
Erie Lackawanna wrote:While there are a couple neglected buildings in downtown Scranton, you really cannot compare that to Gary and Detroit, which are for all intents gone in many places. Scranton's just an old time city trying to hold on and doing its best.
I apologize if I gave the wrong impression..I really liked Scranton and enjoyed my visit there..some great folks..that's why it bothered me..it was just odd to look up at twenty story building and then as I walked toward it..to realize it was pretty much a shell...I went over to Scranton Hobby...stayed at the old Lackwanna Station which has to have one of the most impressive interiors of any station I have ever entered...I hope Scranton gets some of it's lifeblood back...I just came away feeling..is'nt that a d_____n shame...?
It's easy to do when you are the only one making cars. If you have competition, and you have to sell your product for 20% more because you pay your employees more, then you can bet that those employees will gladly take their generous salaries and buy your competitor's product.
Datafever wrote:It's easy to do when you are the only one making cars. If you have competition, and you have to sell your product for 20% more because you pay your employees more, then you can bet that those employees will gladly take their generous salaries and buy your competitor's product.
Here's an idea, let's level the playing field with tariffs on goods manufactured offshore , and use the proceeds to revitalize Amtrak?
TheAntiGates wrote:Here's an idea, let's level the playing field with tariffs on goods manufactured offshore , and use the proceeds to revitalize Amtrak?
Heh. It really doesn't take tariffs. What will tariffs accomplish, except to raise the prices of imports? If people are serious about it, they can always "buy American" regardless of any price/quality differential that may exist. In fact, if all union members always bought American whenever they had the choice to do so, the American economy would be quite revitalized, with a resulting increase in wages to boot.
....Finding the products you care to buy in America {made in USA}, might be a problem. Many are history.
Datafever wrote: TheAntiGates wrote:Here's an idea, let's level the playing field with tariffs on goods manufactured offshore , and use the proceeds to revitalize Amtrak? What will tariffs accomplish, except to raise the prices of imports?
What will tariffs accomplish, except to raise the prices of imports?
Tariffs will place the incentive upon corporations to repatriate production and assembly jobs
hint: GE didn't move their refrigerator plant to mexico because they were looking for a workforce that spoke english.
Right now many firms that would have kept their means of production in the USA, couldn't and expect to remain competitive with outfits that don't care if their workforce lives in a sewer.
Tariffs (if placed correctly) would work wonders towards bringing jobs back to these shores.
Sometimes a little protectionism is a good thing, and IMO is warranted in this instance.
wallyworld wrote: it's also sad to note the appearance of new ghosts towns out in Nebraska and the Dakotas.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.