Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
November 2006 issue: Concrete Railroad
November 2006 issue: Concrete Railroad
698 views
1 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
BellmoreBob
Member since
August 2002
26 posts
November 2006 issue: Concrete Railroad
Posted by
BellmoreBob
on Thursday, September 28, 2006 6:18 PM
Many thanks to William D. Middleton for the article and photos: Concrete railroad: Delaware, Lackawanna & Western pioneered the use of reinforced concrete in its bridges and structures. It reminded me of the day I brought two friends, construction engineers of smaller structures, on an automobile trip to show them the Starrucca Viaduct (fitted stone, without mortar, 1848). On the way home, we stopped also at Tunkhannock (modern reinforced concrete, 1915). My companions instructed me that Tunkhannock was showing the effect of the different expansion in temperature of the metal reinforcement vs. the surrounding concrete. Not civil engineers, they claimed that Starrucca was in better shape. Comments? (Both men are now deceased.)
Reply
Flint Hills Tex
Member since
September 2005
From: Good Old Germany
159 posts
Posted by
Flint Hills Tex
on Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:43 PM
Just for the record: I am not any kind of engineer and the only thing I've had to do with construction was helping build some houses. In the town where I live, the railroad runs under two street bridges, the first, a reinforced concrete bridge built during the 70's, the other, a fitted stone bridge, much older and narrower (1 lane). Both bridges have to put up with modern day traffic, including tractor trailers. The reinforced concrete bridge looks better to the eye; nevertheless, the local authorities have put up pylons and traffic signs limiting the traffic on it by tonnage and direction (the pylons only permit traffic to cross the bridge in one direction at a time, making it effectively also a one lane bridge). The fitted stone bridge has no posted weight limitations, but walking under it, one sees white residue seemingly seeping out from between the stones. The rails underneath are extremely corroded, and upon asking a knowlegdable person, I was told that this was caused by the salt used on the road during the Winter. Despite this, the bridge continues to serve its purpose without any limitations. As a lay person, I am certain that the fitted stone structure is more sound and long lasting than the reinforced concrete. There are bridges over major rivers that were built by the Romans, and still carry traffic! At the same time, the reinforced concret bridges on the German Autobahn need replacement about every 30 to 50 years.
Out here we...pay no attention to titles or honors or whatever because we have found they don't measure a man.... A man is what he is, and what he is shows in his actions. I do not ask where a man came from or what he was...none of that is important. -Louis Lámour "Shalako"
Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy