Trains.com

Locomotive Questions

3933 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • 10 posts
Locomotive Questions
Posted by mjchern on Friday, September 12, 2003 8:42 PM
Two Questions:

I've been reading the story in the latest Trains Magazine about the SD70M. One of the improvements over the earlier models is "split cooling." Can anyone tell me exactly what that is?

Also, what does anyone know about GE's radial truck? Last I heard it was experimental, but I don't think I've seen it on regular GE production units except for the AS6000s.

Mike Chern
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • 10 posts
Locomotive Questions
Posted by mjchern on Friday, September 12, 2003 8:42 PM
Two Questions:

I've been reading the story in the latest Trains Magazine about the SD70M. One of the improvements over the earlier models is "split cooling." Can anyone tell me exactly what that is?

Also, what does anyone know about GE's radial truck? Last I heard it was experimental, but I don't think I've seen it on regular GE production units except for the AS6000s.

Mike Chern
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 12, 2003 9:11 PM
This cooling system allowes the turbocharger altercoolers to be cooled down using the same coolant as the engine, but on a separate piping network, separate circulating pump, radiators and fans. The reason for such system was strictly to increase the engine output (+HP's). And in these days the EPA emission regulation for locomotives was not a concern as it's now. Furthermore it been observed that lower the air box temperature offers an improvement in regard to emission reduction as well. So today new and many rebuilt EMD 645 and 710 engines are equiped with four (4) pass aftercoolers instead of a two (2) pass as in the past (better efficiency). BTW the new Metra MP36PH-3S equiped with a 16-645F3B is design as such using a 50/50 water glicol mixture as aftercoolers coolant. The engine coolant is still treated water as before.Don


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 12, 2003 9:11 PM
This cooling system allowes the turbocharger altercoolers to be cooled down using the same coolant as the engine, but on a separate piping network, separate circulating pump, radiators and fans. The reason for such system was strictly to increase the engine output (+HP's). And in these days the EPA emission regulation for locomotives was not a concern as it's now. Furthermore it been observed that lower the air box temperature offers an improvement in regard to emission reduction as well. So today new and many rebuilt EMD 645 and 710 engines are equiped with four (4) pass aftercoolers instead of a two (2) pass as in the past (better efficiency). BTW the new Metra MP36PH-3S equiped with a 16-645F3B is design as such using a 50/50 water glicol mixture as aftercoolers coolant. The engine coolant is still treated water as before.Don


  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Harrisburg PA / Dover AFB DE
  • 1,482 posts
Posted by adrianspeeder on Saturday, September 13, 2003 2:07 PM
Will the 50/50 water glicol mixture freeze, and therefor have to be drained every time the unit is shut down in cold weather? Thanks.

Adrianspeeder

USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Harrisburg PA / Dover AFB DE
  • 1,482 posts
Posted by adrianspeeder on Saturday, September 13, 2003 2:07 PM
Will the 50/50 water glicol mixture freeze, and therefor have to be drained every time the unit is shut down in cold weather? Thanks.

Adrianspeeder

USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Harrisburg PA / Dover AFB DE
  • 1,482 posts
Posted by adrianspeeder on Saturday, September 13, 2003 2:08 PM
Hey! I got a star!

Adrianspeeder

USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Harrisburg PA / Dover AFB DE
  • 1,482 posts
Posted by adrianspeeder on Saturday, September 13, 2003 2:08 PM
Hey! I got a star!

Adrianspeeder

USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,537 posts
Posted by jchnhtfd on Saturday, September 13, 2003 9:24 PM
Coupla comments... another reason for the split cooling is that aftercoolers, turbochargers, and main engines all like to run at different temperatures if they can. A lot easier with split circuits.

And 50/50 glycol (usually ethylene glycol, but could be propylene...) water mixes don't freeze, and so don't have to be drained. On the other hand... they ain't cheap.
Jamie
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,537 posts
Posted by jchnhtfd on Saturday, September 13, 2003 9:24 PM
Coupla comments... another reason for the split cooling is that aftercoolers, turbochargers, and main engines all like to run at different temperatures if they can. A lot easier with split circuits.

And 50/50 glycol (usually ethylene glycol, but could be propylene...) water mixes don't freeze, and so don't have to be drained. On the other hand... they ain't cheap.
Jamie
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Harrisburg PA / Dover AFB DE
  • 1,482 posts
Posted by adrianspeeder on Sunday, September 14, 2003 7:26 PM
What is an aftercooler? My diesel pickup has an intercooler, it cools air coming out of the turbo before going into the engine. Is that the same thing?

Adrianspeeder

USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Harrisburg PA / Dover AFB DE
  • 1,482 posts
Posted by adrianspeeder on Sunday, September 14, 2003 7:26 PM
What is an aftercooler? My diesel pickup has an intercooler, it cools air coming out of the turbo before going into the engine. Is that the same thing?

Adrianspeeder

USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 14, 2003 7:48 PM
You guys should look at this month's TRAINS. It has a complete discussion on this issue starting on page 34.

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 14, 2003 7:48 PM
You guys should look at this month's TRAINS. It has a complete discussion on this issue starting on page 34.

LC
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, September 15, 2003 6:33 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by adrianspeeder

Hey! I got a star!

Adrianspeeder

Congratulations! Welcome to the world of silent conversation!

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, September 15, 2003 6:33 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by adrianspeeder

Hey! I got a star!

Adrianspeeder

Congratulations! Welcome to the world of silent conversation!

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 15, 2003 10:48 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by adrianspeeder

What is an aftercooler? My diesel pickup has an intercooler, it cools air coming out of the turbo before going into the engine. Is that the same thing?

Adrianspeeder


Adrian, Yes they do the same thing but an aftercooler uses the coolant to cool the compressed air and an intercooler uses the air passing thru the radiator to cool the air. [^]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 15, 2003 10:48 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by adrianspeeder

What is an aftercooler? My diesel pickup has an intercooler, it cools air coming out of the turbo before going into the engine. Is that the same thing?

Adrianspeeder


Adrian, Yes they do the same thing but an aftercooler uses the coolant to cool the compressed air and an intercooler uses the air passing thru the radiator to cool the air. [^]
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: NW Ohio
  • 37 posts
Posted by gwjordan1950 on Friday, September 19, 2003 10:44 PM
IfSince your on the subject of coolers. The trucking industry on their engines, mostly large c.i. displacement, has both. The intercooler is along side the radiator. You might think that the whole area is radiator and coolant. It is not . the one side is air flow off of the turbo. it then hoes out to to intake manifold where it goes into the aftercooler. This cools the air down to where it is a reasonable temp.to go into the cylinder for mixing, as the fuel is being atomizing thru the injectors for combustion. The temp of the air coming out of the turbo, if being under a heavy pull can be in excess of 1200 degrees!! that is the reason for inter and after cooler4s. I don't understand why the railroad industry is just now switching over to either ethylglycol or other types of coolant for their engines. They run so much cooler with a 50/50 mix of water and coolant. this is My opinion!!!!!!
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: NW Ohio
  • 37 posts
Posted by gwjordan1950 on Friday, September 19, 2003 10:44 PM
IfSince your on the subject of coolers. The trucking industry on their engines, mostly large c.i. displacement, has both. The intercooler is along side the radiator. You might think that the whole area is radiator and coolant. It is not . the one side is air flow off of the turbo. it then hoes out to to intake manifold where it goes into the aftercooler. This cools the air down to where it is a reasonable temp.to go into the cylinder for mixing, as the fuel is being atomizing thru the injectors for combustion. The temp of the air coming out of the turbo, if being under a heavy pull can be in excess of 1200 degrees!! that is the reason for inter and after cooler4s. I don't understand why the railroad industry is just now switching over to either ethylglycol or other types of coolant for their engines. They run so much cooler with a 50/50 mix of water and coolant. this is My opinion!!!!!!
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,492 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:18 PM
Railroads don't use glycol/water mix for a number of reasons. Cost is one factor. Antifreeze isn't cheap and locomotive cooling systems are huge. Another is the possibility of bearing damage from coolant leaking into the crankcase oil if glycol is in the coolant mix.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,492 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:18 PM
Railroads don't use glycol/water mix for a number of reasons. Cost is one factor. Antifreeze isn't cheap and locomotive cooling systems are huge. Another is the possibility of bearing damage from coolant leaking into the crankcase oil if glycol is in the coolant mix.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:44 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CSSHEGEWISCH

Railroads don't use glycol/water mix for a number of reasons. Cost is one factor. Antifreeze isn't cheap and locomotive cooling systems are huge. Another is the possibility of bearing damage from coolant leaking into the crankcase oil if glycol is in the coolant mix.


...and one other thing. You don't get as much cooling capacity out of antifreeze/water mixture as you do with straight water. Although the boiling point is raised and you can carry a higher temp differential, it's more that offset by the mixture's lower specific heat and lousy heat transfer properties. At Conrail, we looked pretty hard at testing some antifreeze (propylene glycol) in some EMDs and thought we could get away with the reduced cooling capacity (the cooling systems on locos are designed for the desert SW - the NE isn't as hot), but the chance of the coolant getting into the crankcase was just too scary.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:44 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CSSHEGEWISCH

Railroads don't use glycol/water mix for a number of reasons. Cost is one factor. Antifreeze isn't cheap and locomotive cooling systems are huge. Another is the possibility of bearing damage from coolant leaking into the crankcase oil if glycol is in the coolant mix.


...and one other thing. You don't get as much cooling capacity out of antifreeze/water mixture as you do with straight water. Although the boiling point is raised and you can carry a higher temp differential, it's more that offset by the mixture's lower specific heat and lousy heat transfer properties. At Conrail, we looked pretty hard at testing some antifreeze (propylene glycol) in some EMDs and thought we could get away with the reduced cooling capacity (the cooling systems on locos are designed for the desert SW - the NE isn't as hot), but the chance of the coolant getting into the crankcase was just too scary.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy