Trains.com

Train Crews: shorts allowed?

2204 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Southern Iowa, near BNSF double track mainline
  • 111 posts
Train Crews: shorts allowed?
Posted by william6 on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 4:03 AM
Since we are having alot of very hot weather all over the USA, I got to wondering?: are train crews allowed to wear shorts on the job? I assume cabs on locomotives are air-conditioned, but do they work real well?
1st train ride was at 18 months old...and still riding the rails!
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: The Beautiful North Georgia Mountians
  • 2,362 posts
Posted by Railfan1 on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 5:38 AM
I think short are strictly prohibited.
"It's a great day to be alive" "Of all the words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these, It might have been......"
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 6:35 AM
Shorts are a potential safety hazard.  Long pants provide a manner of protection against any number of possible scrapes, cuts and other abrasions.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 7:43 AM

That's right--no shorts for us railroaders.  Some people working my job wear them, and they don't get into too much trouble.  But they wouldn't be allowed to climb down from the tower and knock off an errant brake or open a knuckle (which I've done when necessary).

The "right" official is going to come along one day, and that will be the end of that.  One of the RCOs was written up and told to change when he had on a sleeveless shirt of some sort during the previous heat wave.  Short sleeves are OK, but no sleeves are not.

It gets really frustrating to see the Global 2 spotters in shorts, not to mention the over-the-road truckers.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 3:10 PM

Even with long pants - I have a continuing series of bruises and scrapes between my knees and the tops of my safety shoes.  I would never consider shorts for railroad work.

dd

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 3:18 PM

OTR Truckers can wear shorts and short sleeves.

Just not around the main ternimal. I worked for an outfit years ago and came out of the south Gulf Coast where it was 110+ for days. It was a balmy 90 in Williamsport. Everyone inside the office were choking on suits and slacks. I got chewed out because someone has to say something with the "Official dress code" Reality sometimes demand proper clothing to stay cool or warm.

The heaviest thing besides lumping beef and seafood is pulling 5th wheels and sliding tandems. Some of the parts will go thru your body should they fail. Long pants or not. Especially on flatbed work.

I look at our Military in Iraq and other places wearing armor and carrying almost half thier own weight on other stuff in that heat. I salute them.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 4:02 PM
Another reason for Long Sleeves and Pants is to Prevent Immediate Skin Contact with Possibly Dangerous Lading such as Acids and Chemicals that may have Spilt from Tank Cars, etc. onto their Grab Irons or Hand Rails During Loading or Coupling.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 5:08 PM

Yup,

No shorts, or sleeveless shirts allowed on my railroad.

Prevents just what SDR north was speaking off…nothing like getting splashed from a tankcar to ruin your day.

Some of the refineries and plants we work even go so far as to issue you a disposable overall with hood when you work their plant.

The acid plant requires it, period, and they are white, so any spill or splash will show up easily.

(The acid, full strength, is bright orange)

One requires a respirator…they have a “guest” box at the track gates with three of them in it for our use, they swap them out for fresh after we leave.

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 6:09 PM

I will consider a MOPP Level 4 if the suit is climate controlled for heat and cold.

Then I can work all day in 65 degree weather inside the suit.

Been some time since I hauled Acid products but can remember you signed a waiver and hardly any protection back then other than what you already were taught. I had one load that was particularly onery and required TLC and decided that I will not haul any more of those. The facility I loaded it were filling bottles 10 feet from the dock itself and some minor splashing was going on. No thanks.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • 44 posts
Posted by cyeargin on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 7:50 PM
 edblysard wrote:

 

One requires a respirator…they have a “guest” box at the track gates with three of them in it for our use, they swap them out for fresh after we leave.

The LCP chlorine plant that used to be in my hometown did this, and in fact I remember reading in an old Southern / NS employee timetable that a RR employee could not accept a call to work this plant if he had a full beard that would prevent wearing said respirator.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 8:49 PM

To quote our instructor at AAR's HazMat training center at Rattlesnake Junction - Pueblo:

"Nikes, DON'T fail me now!"Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,011 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 9:13 PM

I'm not even T&E and I wouldn't consider wearing shorts when on the railroad - There are just too many opportunities for scrapes, etc.  My shins are already a collection of scars, and not from the RR.  I even keep gloves with me, although my primary duty is keeping the customers safe and entertained...

Consider what I wear if I'm fighting fire, too.  Pants and coat with an outer shell, vapor barrier, and thermal barrier, boots, hood, helmet, gloves, perhaps an air pack (even though I'm Chief, I still go inside sometimes).  Many's the time I've left a fire scene with the outside of my gear perfectly dry, but the inside thoroughly soaked.

The answer is plenty of hydration - hence the large barrels of virtual Gatorade at the DD&CS.  I'll usually go through 4-5 bottles of water during a day on the RR in this summer weather. 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Louisville,Ky.
  • 5,077 posts
Posted by locomutt on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 10:41 PM
 tree68 wrote:

I'm not even T&E and I wouldn't consider wearing shorts when on the railroad - There are just too many opportunities for scrapes, etc.  My shins are already a collection of scars, and not from the RR.  I even keep gloves with me, although my primary duty is keeping the customers safe and entertained...

Consider what I wear if I'm fighting fire, too.  Pants and coat with an outer shell, vapor barrier, and thermal barrier, boots, hood, helmet, gloves, perhaps an air pack (even though I'm Chief, I still go inside sometimes).  Many's the time I've left a fire scene with the outside of my gear perfectly dry, but the inside thoroughly soaked.

The answer is plenty of hydration - hence the large barrels of virtual Gatorade at the DD&CS.  I'll usually go through 4-5 bottles of water during a day on the RR in this summer weather. 



Imagine crawling inside an upside down vehicle from an MVA .(motor vehicle accident)
I had enough trouble getting glass shards out of my pants,let alone my knees. Shorts don't
seem to be an option there.  As much as we would have loved to have worn shorts, during
hot weather, I think common sense prevailed.  We had less scrapes, scratches and
abrasions on our legs wearing pants. (Sometimes we had to get into a vehicle before the
firefighters showed up.)

Being Crazy,keeps you from going "INSANE" !! "The light at the end of the tunnel,has been turned off due to budget cuts" NOT AFRAID A Vet., and PROUD OF IT!!

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • 44 posts
Posted by cyeargin on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 11:06 PM
 locomutt wrote:
 tree68 wrote:

I'm not even T&E and I wouldn't consider wearing shorts when on the railroad - There are just too many opportunities for scrapes, etc.  My shins are already a collection of scars, and not from the RR.  I even keep gloves with me, although my primary duty is keeping the customers safe and entertained...

Consider what I wear if I'm fighting fire, too.  Pants and coat with an outer shell, vapor barrier, and thermal barrier, boots, hood, helmet, gloves, perhaps an air pack (even though I'm Chief, I still go inside sometimes).  Many's the time I've left a fire scene with the outside of my gear perfectly dry, but the inside thoroughly soaked.

The answer is plenty of hydration - hence the large barrels of virtual Gatorade at the DD&CS.  I'll usually go through 4-5 bottles of water during a day on the RR in this summer weather. 



Imagine crawling inside an upside down vehicle from an MVA .(motor vehicle accident)
I had enough trouble getting glass shards out of my pants,let alone my knees. Shorts don't
seem to be an option there.  As much as we would have loved to have worn shorts, during
hot weather, I think common sense prevailed.  We had less scrapes, scratches and
abrasions on our legs wearing pants. (Sometimes we had to get into a vehicle before the
firefighters showed up.)

Tree & Mutt: been a firefighter & paramedic for the last 22 years, and know right where you're coming from, LOL Wink [;)]

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, August 2, 2006 10:16 AM
The United States Navy learned early during WW2 that long pants and shirts, even if not fire resistant, provide a degree of protection against burns, so shorts were out, even in the tropics.  The Australian and New Zealand Navies were quick to pick up on this example.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy