Trains.com

Changing roads to LRV only?

758 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Changing roads to LRV only?
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, July 13, 2006 4:17 PM
I was looking into the discussion concerning light rail construction and retail impact and another question popped into my mind.

Was there ever a case where a street was converted to a Light Rail ROW with no auto traffic allowed?  Essentially kicking the automobiles off the land and reserving it for LRVs and pedestrians. Even if it was just a block long - I'm curious what impacts it would have.

In one hand I could see it hurting as it would take away parking, but if it were to recieve a makeover with additional trees and greenery, it may provide attractive to pedestrians.  But did this situation ever happen?


Just curious.
Tom


It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,422 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:56 PM

K Street Mall, Sacramento CA, (K Street between 8th Street and 12 th Street).  The "Mall" was built first and the light rail system was built years latter.

O Street between 9th and 10th was closed to autos when the Light Rail was built.  Some other blocks on O street may be closed or at least have restricted auto access

 

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=sacramento,+ca+&ie=UTF8&ll=38.578903,-121.493002&spn=0.003598,0.010536&t=h&om=1

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 13, 2006 11:57 PM
Portland's 2nd Avenue north of Yamhill became a "transit only" street when MAX was put it. I don't think it was the first, but it was one *of* the first such.
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, July 14, 2006 10:27 AM
About 10-15 years ago, Chicago proposed a rather substantial light rail network for the Loop and River North and River West areas.  Several streets would have been closed to auto traffic as part of the proposal.  Due to lack of funding, nothing ever came to pass.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Friday, July 14, 2006 10:32 AM

 abcraghead wrote:
Portland's 2nd Avenue north of Yamhill became a "transit only" street when MAX was put it. I don't think it was the first, but it was one *of* the first such.

 

Yes, and it looks much nicer then the rest of the streets, in my opinion anyway.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Gateway to Donner Summit
  • 434 posts
Posted by broncoman on Friday, July 14, 2006 11:43 AM

I think there is going to be more road closed-to-autos when they complete the connection of the light rail tracks from K street mall to the Amtrak station.  I can't remember which blocks though.

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy