Trains.com

BNSF 6327 SDP40?

1904 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
BNSF 6327 SDP40?
Posted by edblysard on Monday, May 29, 2006 1:04 PM
Had this one in the yard today, and noticed the rear was a little different from the "normal" SD40s...the rads were moved forward, and and additional compartment was there instead.
Along with having the "white face" paint, the rear hood was flat as a pancake on the tail end...so the question is, where did this unit come from as in former owners, and what was in the compartment?(see the small louvers)
Didnt have the chance to climb around in it, but guessing a steam generator?

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, May 29, 2006 1:11 PM
BNSF 6327 was indeed an SDP40, having been built in May 1966 as GN 325 (later BN 9855, then 6399 when the steam generator was removed). It's considered a straight SD40 now. The steam generator was what was in the extension behind the radiators. This was what EMD's modern passenger diesels were supposed to look like--until somebody thought of cowl units, such as the FP45.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: BNSF MP968.3 in California
  • 247 posts
Posted by BNSF_GP60M on Monday, May 29, 2006 1:14 PM
Yes BNSF #6327 was equiped with steam generators. They were ordered by Great Northern (#325) and used in passenger train service until Amtrak. They were transfer to frieght service when the generators were removed.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, May 29, 2006 3:54 PM
Well, at least it's back to having 6 axles under it instead of 7 like it had for a while.

Only NdeM (14)and GN(6) had SDP40s....
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, May 29, 2006 5:44 PM
I will bite...any photos of it with the seven axles?
Four on the rear, right?

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Robe Valley, Wa.
  • 719 posts
Posted by GN-Rick on Monday, May 29, 2006 7:14 PM
BNSF 6327 was never equipped with seven axles. You've got it confused
with the BN 6599, the former GN 333, an SDP45. In the middle 80s, that
locomotive was reworked to accept an experimental four axle self-steering
truck-sort of a predecessor to the current radial truck. Interestingly, the unit
was operated in this configuration as an A1A-B+B because it was only
wired for 6 motors. because EMD and BN were interestedin testing the
complete experimental truck under power, they removed the center traction
motor from the lead truck. After the testing period, 6599 was retired, though
EMD was returned the experimental truck. There are pics of the unit on
the 'Fallen Flags' site showing it back in C-C configuration, but in a
stripped for parts condition.
Rick Bolger Great Northern Railway Cascade Division-Lines West
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Monday, May 29, 2006 11:42 PM
I saw one of these in storage in Denver CO in 1990 (or so). I looked at it for a while before I realised what it was. I am amazed that one is still around, (as I was then) but it is just another SD40 and it probably has a big fuel tank from converting the former water tank to fuel.

M636C
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Robe Valley, Wa.
  • 719 posts
Posted by GN-Rick on Monday, May 29, 2006 11:55 PM
The SDP40s have the same overall size of fuel tank as a standard SD40.
The frame lengths were the same on the two models. The difference with
the SDP40 is that all the machinery, hoods and cab were shifted forward
on the frame to gain space at the rear for the steam generator compartment.
You can notice this by noting that the SDP40 does not have the big porches
that the SD40s have. The SDP45s, on the other hand, did have a longer
frame and therefore a larger fuel tank.
Rick Bolger Great Northern Railway Cascade Division-Lines West
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • From: Independence, MO
  • 1,570 posts
Posted by UPTRAIN on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 1:19 AM
UP has a few of them, SDP40 or SDP45's rebuilt to SD40M-2's still in service.

Pump

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:42 AM
UP has a few ex-EL SDP45's that came to it by way of SP. They were part of the fodder used in the large rebuilding program by MK/Boise/MPI for SP.

The ex-GN SDP40's eventually turned up on BNSF and MRL.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 7:24 AM
The EL "SDP45"s weren't really passenger units, in that they never had the steam generators (or HEP). They were just built on the longer frame to provide increased fuel capacity.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    March 2001
  • From: SOUTHERN WASH-ATL MAIN
  • 187 posts
Posted by railroad65 on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 7:30 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by GN-Rick

BNSF 6327 was never equipped with seven axles. You've got it confused
with the BN 6599, the former GN 333, an SDP45. In the middle 80s, that
locomotive was reworked to accept an experimental four axle self-steering
truck-sort of a predecessor to the current radial truck. Interestingly, the unit
was operated in this configuration as an A1A-B+B because it was only
wired for 6 motors. because EMD and BN were interestedin testing the
complete experimental truck under power, they removed the center traction
motor from the lead truck. After the testing period, 6599 was retired, though
EMD was returned the experimental truck. There are pics of the unit on
the 'Fallen Flags' site showing it back in C-C configuration, but in a
stripped for parts condition.




http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=177846
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 11:02 AM
I caught this unit in the lead of an M train through Minnesota last fall.



I knew it was a different unit when it went by...

Mike

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy