Trains.com

BNSF 5612.

763 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
BNSF 5612.
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 4:37 PM
Does anyone know if the BNSF 5612 has the BNSF 'New Image' scheme? Because the HO Athearn has it. Allan.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 5:02 PM
Doesnt look like it.

http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?road_number=BNSF%205612

Colin
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 7:55 PM
That's what I thought. Then why would Athearn just go ahead and paint a Model in the 'New Image' scheme without permission from the BNSF Railway? Or am I wrong?
Allan.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 8:07 PM
I dont think BNSF, a Fortune 500 company cares if Athearn paints a locomotive in the current scheme, besides in a couple months, it will be in H3 anyways.

In fact, I would think that BNSF would dislike it if the it wasn't painted in H3, seeing how they have gone throught so much to produce this new image for themsleves
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:07 AM
I am sure that UP would sue and defend itself under a circumstance like this..

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Milwaukee, WI, US
  • 1,384 posts
Posted by fuzzybroken on Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:58 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by BNSFrailfan

That's what I thought. Then why would Athearn just go ahead and paint a Model in the 'New Image' scheme without permission from the BNSF Railway? Or am I wrong?
Allan.
Wow, seriously, a model railroad company putting an incorrect paint scheme on a model, that never happens! By the way, do any of you have pictures of those high-nose GP38-2s that Santa Fe had in red and silver?

(Tongue firmly planted in cheek...)
-Fuzzy Fuzzy World 3
  • Member since
    May 2002
  • 223 posts
Posted by tomnoy3 on Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:43 AM
Thats not the only inaccurate athearn paint. My first locomotive was an Athearn SDP40 in C&NW. Not just was the paint scheme off, CNW never owned an SDP40.
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Thursday, April 13, 2006 2:36 PM
I’m hoping Athearn will release SD70MACs (non-ACe) in H3 too, even though BNSF hasn’t repainted any of those into the new “powerbar” logo scheme either.

Anyone wanting a Gevo or SD70ACe will have to pay premium from a company like Tower 55 since I don't think Athearn or any of the other mainstream plastic model train makers have molds for either (though maybe they are working on it?)
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 319 posts
Posted by sanvtoman on Thursday, April 13, 2006 2:41 PM
Years ago Atheran was the big player.Now for me its either Atlas or Kato.I wish for more high hood NS models.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy