Trains.com

Ever seen track this bad?

3548 views
60 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 6,434 posts
Ever seen track this bad?
Posted by FJ and G on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:18 PM
I've seen worse than this (FJ&G for instance, where the rails are really crooked), but was surprised to see that the UP has a pretty bad line going to the Airport just south of Austin Texas













  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:24 PM
Thats not bad track, just bad ties.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:29 PM
Looks like the lines gets some traffic on it.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,422 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:31 PM
40+ years ago I saw a spur that had a curve laid with a combination of short pieces of straight rail and short pieces of curved rail that were not even close to the correct radius.

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:36 PM
That looks like Class 1 track from what I can see of it. Not bad at all.

I'm sure MC would be more accurate, unfortunately the pictures are poorly taken so it is difficult to tell how many good ties per rail, but I have seen MUCH worse track that is operated every day.

LC

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:44 PM
Looks a little better than the ex CP E&N line..

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 4,115 posts
Posted by tatans on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:52 PM
Yes the ties need a little "touching up" but on the top photo who are those lucky people in those lovely condos on the left, what a view of trains, nice as long as they keep below 85 mph.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 3:08 PM
...Just a few years ago on the Florida Central I saw track every bit as bad located near Eustis and Tavares, Fl. It served an orange processing business at Umatila a few miles north of those towns. Believe that business is closed now. Every day a few covered hoppers were moved in and out on that branch. Saw it operate for more than a half dozen years and never witnessed any cars on the ground. Sure can't understand how they stayed on the rails. Rails were bad as well as the ties and road bed....Many places one could not see ANY ties, rails were down in the ground with grass growing all around them. I do have some photos but would have to locate them.

Quentin

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 3:51 PM
I would second LC's comment, probably Cls 1 (10 MPH) if I could see more of it.

Just because a tie looks bad doesn't mean it it is. (Will it hold gage, is it in one piece, will it hold a spike???)....Only needs 5 good ties per rail length (the other 19 can be junk or gone) and hopefully those good ties support the staggered goints.

Switch appears to be straight-railed/frog removed. No biggie.

It appears it drains and vegitation is not a problem, I've seen much worse that is still FRA legal.
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:32 PM
That track just needed the attention of a good tie gang and will likely get the attention in time (cross the fingers on that). Now, I rode on the Ex-NH Danbury branch in the mid 70's and there were no level joints anywhere, and the "washboard" M.U.s rocked and rolled like a trawler in a hurricane, only drier![sigh] The worst track I've seen a train on would have to be the last remnant of the old NYC Tonawanda branch, locally referred to as the "peanut". That line was on the "hit list" for quite a while and NYC and successor Penn Central wound up having to keep the west end in to handle Lehigh Valley's Niagara Falls traffic. Even the relatively light LV 4-motor units rocked around, at all speeds, with spikes popping out from the tie plates and mud flying everywhere! Came 4/1/76 and that was that![xx(] I wonder did Penn Central cringe when the Valley's "monster" C628s (633-641) went up along that line? Another line with really awful track was the [censored]branch of the [censored] which had a 2.5 MPH speed restriction. [censored], in their wonderful and crazy manner, ran SD45s on that branch, with full (4000gal) fuel tanks.Remarkably everything stayed on the tracks.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:05 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear

That looks like Class 1 track from what I can see of it. Not bad at all.

I'm sure MC would be more accurate, unfortunately the pictures are poorly taken so it is difficult to tell how many good ties per rail, but I have seen MUCH worse track that is operated every day.

LC

LC


Like LC, I too have seen much worse track conditions than those in your pictures and it was also active track...not to minimize the poor condition of the tracks in your photos but it is really nothing that unusual at all (unfortunately).
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:09 PM
That looks like the ex-RI from Bureau Jct. to Peoria.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 135 posts
Posted by monkeyman2 on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 7:22 PM

Worst tracks I've ever seen....
Come and vist my website- www.freewebs.com/bcanda
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: SE Wisconsin
  • 1,181 posts
Posted by solzrules on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 7:39 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear

That looks like Class 1 track from what I can see of it. Not bad at all.

I'm sure MC would be more accurate, unfortunately the pictures are poorly taken so it is difficult to tell how many good ties per rail, but I have seen MUCH worse track that is operated every day.

LC





LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!![:D]
You think this is bad? Just wait until inflation kicks in.....
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: My Old Kentucky Home
  • 599 posts
Posted by mackb4 on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:07 PM
The overall look of the track is not to bad.There is ties that need to be replaced and some tamping.The gauge doesn't look to be that bad.I'd say put some more ballast down and make a 10 mph. slow order and use it.

Collin ,operator of the " Eastern Kentucky & Ohio R.R."

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:12 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by monkeyman2


Worst tracks I've ever seen....


Awww, come on, I'd say that 79MPPH passenger track! [;)]
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Austin Texas
  • 11 posts
Posted by amtrakwine on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:15 PM
The track is used for freight ,the condos are in a really depressed area of Austin the worst part of town. The line runs to Bastrop and Smithville where it meets the BNSF.


Alvin in Austin
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:24 PM
Yea I've seen some track in even worse shape then that.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 9:50 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by DSchmitt

40+ years ago I saw a spur that had a curve laid with a combination of short pieces of straight rail and short pieces of curved rail that were not even close to the correct radius.

That is really a sight to see too.... short piecse of straight rail making a curve. On the old Pacific Electric Ry in Los Angeles, we had an area known as Wingfoot that had this concept. We had to operate at about 5-6 mph around them.


Virlon
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Cincinnati, OH
  • 174 posts
Posted by Cheviot Hill on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:19 PM
In one of the books that I have, The Pennsylvania Railroad In Cincinnati. There is a picture of a tree trunk being used for a tie. It was taken near Lebanon Station in Lebanon Ohio. Not sure of the time of the photo. Pretty strange looking with branch stubs sticking up.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:43 PM
I rode a tourist railroad that had track much worse than that. I don't think we topped 10 mph. It was harvest season, and the combines in the adjacent fields were walkin' away from our train![xx(]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 11:03 PM
Yep. I saw a lot of PC and LV track prior to the formation of Conrail.

Old Timer
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 32.8
  • 769 posts
Posted by Kevin C. Smith on Thursday, March 23, 2006 1:28 AM
I'd have to agree that, for an industrial area access track, it's not too bad (more ugly than unusable) but it reminds me of the tracks that used to go through my hometown. Rather than just a few miles to the airport, it was 60 miles through the woods like that. Prior to the wholsesale slaughter of branchlines in the 80's, a lot of track like that was in service. I'd have to agree with FJ & G, though- I would've expected better condition on one of today's big class 1's.
"Look at those high cars roll-finest sight in the world."
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 23, 2006 6:23 AM
Would have loved to have track that good back about 1970 on the PC!
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Thursday, March 23, 2006 7:03 AM
I was at Olthordorf Street or something like that in Austin a few weeks ago & I saw 3 trains moving along at a pretty good pace & the track there seem in fine shape. Maybe this is a very lightly used spur off the mainline which is the reason it is in the shape it is? [:)]


Originally posted by amtrakwine

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Thursday, March 23, 2006 7:22 AM
I've seen trains on that track - 10 mph is about right.

dd
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:13 AM
Part of the IHB lead into Hyman Michaels in Hegewisch is in similar condition. It also has the added problem of going through a marsh so the drainage is almost non-existent.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:28 AM
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:32 AM
That's terrible! Ok, the line on bottom says "Tie is positioned wrong", the wording in the middles says something like "Tie should be placed here under joint", the top line says "Weight with no under support will stress this out"
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Thursday, March 23, 2006 12:40 PM
Jim White: Keep your day job. You'll never make it as a railroader.

49CFR213.109(b)(3) and 49CFR213.109(c) says that's just fine for 10 MPH track.

You clearly do NOT understand how the angle bar and bolts work (as in the logic behind the design of the system distributing the load)...

The local roadmaster is probably doing the best he can with what budget he has and still manages to keep things rolling.

[(-D][(-D][(-D]
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy