Trains.com

What will Metra do for power on UP west when the F40's wear out?

6256 views
31 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, July 15, 2015 5:04 PM

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Wednesday, July 15, 2015 3:42 PM

CShaveRR
You mean the bridge that self-destructed on top of an automobile one 100-degree Fourth of July a few years back, due to heat kinks in the rails because of the difference in ballast between terra firma and an open-deck bridge, which UP had wanted to replace but the cities involved wouldn't let them? Is that the one?

I think it's the one almost exactly two years ago, where (supposedly) the DPU failed to stop pushing when the trainline went into emergency.

Where is the reference to UP wanting to replace the bridge but the local authorities not letting them?  That is missing from most of the "popular" accounts of the accident -- perhaps not surprisingly.

Do we know how the Lindner wrongful-death lawsuit came out?

 

(Sorry to hijack the original thread, the topic of which is still something I'm interested in learning about...)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:29 PM

Andrew Falconer

Does anybody at Union Pacific remember the bridge collapse in Illinois?



You mean the bridge that self-destructed on top of an automobile one 100-degree Fourth of July a few years back, due to heat kinks in the rails because of the difference in ballast between terra firma and an open-deck bridge, which UP had wanted to replace but the cities involved wouldn't let them?  Is that the one?

Andrew Falconer
The Union Pacific management and employees have to replace all the old and weak bridges.



In that case, UP management and employees really should have left it as a fill...

I haven't been on any inspection trips to check out the bridge-rebuilding programs that have taken place on the Northwest Line and are currently taking place on the North Line, but you would be hard-pressed to find any inadequate bridges anywhere on the West Line any more.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Vicksburg, Michigan
  • 2,303 posts
Posted by Andrew Falconer on Sunday, July 12, 2015 11:48 PM

Does anybody at Union Pacific remember the bridge collapse in Illinois?

The Union Pacific management and employees have to replace all the old and weak bridges.

Andrew

Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Saturday, July 11, 2015 3:03 PM

carnej1
IIRC, the P42 was removed from the GE catalog prior to the Tier IIcompliance issues due to the fact that the cab didn't meet new crashworthiness standards. GE is designing an EVOLUTION series passenger unit with updated safety features and there is a conceptual drawing online. This is a four axle unit with a monocoque body like the Genesis, but the nose looks different.

I take it this is a different design from the HSP46 family which has been out for several years now..  Where are the drawings?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Saturday, July 11, 2015 11:38 AM

(1)Most first generation and early second generation power is inadequately shielded (no matter the claims to the contrary) for just about any PTC equipment. The issue may become moot if METRA can't shame the feds into paying for commuter PTC. (kinda ironic in the unfunded mandate department)

(2) Getting those E-50 thru E-65 bridges up to snuf (E-80) ain't gonna be cheap and competes with all the whining from those using the service expecting a more cushy ride and more frequent service (as long as it's $pending OPM)...AAR/TTC is looking at ways to beef-up and extend the life of decaying older bridges that are less expensive and do not require total disassembly and rehab of the bridges...(ie-repair under service)

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Friday, July 10, 2015 10:50 AM

The problem is money, as I understand it. Metra would not rebuild their F40PHs eternally if they didn't have to, but they lack the funding to purchase new units, and don't really need a 125MPH capable unit anyway. If they need extra power, I think more of the ex-GO F59PHs are most likely.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 202 posts
Posted by zkr123 on Friday, July 10, 2015 10:11 AM

I think Metra should take a look at the EMD's F125. 

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, March 7, 2006 11:09 AM
My own guess is that if EMD (which may address smaller markets now that it is independent) or GE (which does have a corporate commitment to aid public transit in general) don't address the market, either of these builders might supply components to Motive Power or a similar more-specialty builder. For many of the commuter operations an elongated switcher with higher-speed gearing and a seperate head-end power diesel and alternator would fill the bill exactly and would not require not require heavy-duty track or bridges. Maybe a gen-set locomtive would we applicable.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Monday, March 6, 2006 8:04 PM
ONe thing about it, the older units will continue to get older and I suspect the rebuilders can only breath so much new like back in to those old commuter power units, and as was mentioned without a lot of money on infra structure, the new engines being built are too heavy and probably too,too much for even consideration, they may wind up going overseas for passenger power, NJ Transit and AMTRAK'S ALP's of a few years back.. passenger diesels are a small specialized market and like [sea]ports, American companies are getting out of that market.

 

 


 

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Omaha-ish, Nebraska
  • 703 posts
Posted by DrummingTrainfan on Monday, March 6, 2006 7:45 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by carnej1

QUOTE: Originally posted by AMTK200

QUOTE: Originally posted by CShaveRR

QUOTE: Originally posted by AMTK200

EMD doesn't make the F59PHI's anymore. Carl the Problem is on the UP-NW/N Lines.


Yep...that's what I said!

Carl,
Sorry didn't the see the part. GE isn't allowed to make P42's because of the EPA laws.


IIRC, the P42 was removed from the GE catalog prior to the Tier IIcompliance issues due to the fact that the cab didn't meet new crashworthiness standards. GE is designing an EVOLUTION series passenger unit with updated safety features and there is a conceptual drawing online. This is a four axle unit with a monocoque body like the Genesis, but the nose looks different.



Where did you find these drawings of the new passenger locos? [:p]
    GIFs from http://www.trainweb.org/mccann/offer.htm -Erik, the displaced CNW, Bears, White Sox, Northern Illnois Huskies, Amtrak and Metra fan.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: near Chicago
  • 937 posts
Posted by Chris30 on Monday, March 6, 2006 12:31 PM
The MP36 is restricted from operating on all three UP (ex-CNW) lines due to engines weight and bridge weight limits. The opinion has been expressed on this thread that the UP West Line is not the issue because heavy freight trains use this line every day. Almost all freight trains operating east of Proviso Yard diverge to the Rockwell Sub (Global I, CSX, etc.) at Kedzie and the issue is with the bridges east of Kedzie that have not been upgraded/reinforced.

I know that there was a bridge replacement project on the UP NW Line a few years ago. Is it possible that some of the bridges on the UP (ex-CNW) are approaching 95 years (1911) without any replacement? And I wonder what the life expectancy of those bridges are?

It will be interesting to see what type of motive power replaces the F40 in the future because the F40 has been the exclusive power on the ex-CNW lines for @20 years now and operating for Metra for close to 30 years.

CC
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,289 posts
Posted by carnej1 on Monday, March 6, 2006 11:43 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AMTK200

QUOTE: Originally posted by CShaveRR

QUOTE: Originally posted by AMTK200

EMD doesn't make the F59PHI's anymore. Carl the Problem is on the UP-NW/N Lines.


Yep...that's what I said!

Carl,
Sorry didn't the see the part. GE isn't allowed to make P42's because of the EPA laws.


IIRC, the P42 was removed from the GE catalog prior to the Tier IIcompliance issues due to the fact that the cab didn't meet new crashworthiness standards. GE is designing an EVOLUTION series passenger unit with updated safety features and there is a conceptual drawing online. This is a four axle unit with a monocoque body like the Genesis, but the nose looks different.

"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 229 posts
Posted by Ham549 on Monday, March 6, 2006 11:09 AM
Gut the F40's and put new stuff in them.
Save the F40PH!
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, March 6, 2006 8:06 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by THE_WEEZ

QUOTE: Originally posted by the feed

what about F59PHI's and such???


No way classic F-40's will do!

Metra's F-40s just came out of overhaule (or so i hear). They will last another 10 years from now. And where did you hear that the new locos where too heavy? If those brides can carry fully loaded frieghts the can sure hold the loco!

Light bridges are indeed the issue, and this issue goes back to steam days. Keep in mind that the North Line is virtually passenger-only and has been that way for decades, freight moves on the New Line. Any through freight on the Northwest Line picks up the Northwest Line at Deval, which avoids the lighter bridges.

As mentioned above, Metra can buy time by re-equipping other lines first and re-assign the newer F40's to the UP lines, but the bridges (mostly in Chicago) will need to be rebuilt.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Omaha-ish, Nebraska
  • 703 posts
Posted by DrummingTrainfan on Sunday, March 5, 2006 8:41 PM
If the F40's were about to just die on the tracks, using the Geeps might make sense, but I don't think that many of them (the GP's) will be around in 10 years. I also doubt that Metra would replace old power with older power[:o)][:I]
    GIFs from http://www.trainweb.org/mccann/offer.htm -Erik, the displaced CNW, Bears, White Sox, Northern Illnois Huskies, Amtrak and Metra fan.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Sunday, March 5, 2006 8:37 PM
How about some old GPs and rebuild them to suit commuter service? Ton of them lying about-GP38s or GP40s?
Andrew
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Omaha-ish, Nebraska
  • 703 posts
Posted by DrummingTrainfan on Sunday, March 5, 2006 8:08 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by THE_WEEZ

QUOTE: Originally posted by the feed

what about F59PHI's and such???


No way classic F-40's will do!

Metra's F-40s just came out of overhaule (or so i hear). They will last another 10 years from now. And where did you hear that the new locos where too heavy? If those brides can carry fully loaded frieghts the can sure hold the loco!



Yea, the F40 will last for 10 more years, but what about after that? They won't last forever...

I think it's more an issue of density than actual weight. A couple freight cars may weigh the same as the locomotive, but distribute it over a larger area.
    GIFs from http://www.trainweb.org/mccann/offer.htm -Erik, the displaced CNW, Bears, White Sox, Northern Illnois Huskies, Amtrak and Metra fan.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 5, 2006 7:08 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by the feed

what about F59PHI's and such???


No way classic F-40's will do!

Metra's F-40s just came out of overhaule (or so i hear). They will last another 10 years from now. And where did you hear that the new locos where too heavy? If those brides can carry fully loaded frieghts the can sure hold the loco!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 5, 2006 6:15 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CShaveRR

QUOTE: Originally posted by AMTK200

EMD doesn't make the F59PHI's anymore. Carl the Problem is on the UP-NW/N Lines.


Yep...that's what I said!

Carl,
Sorry didn't the see the part. GE isn't allowed to make P42's because of the EPA laws.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Sunday, March 5, 2006 4:47 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AMTK200

EMD doesn't make the F59PHI's anymore. Carl the Problem is on the UP-NW/N Lines.


Yep...that's what I said!

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Sunday, March 5, 2006 4:12 PM
Didn't GE stop making P42s? And even if they still made them, the EPA laws wouldn't allow it, right?

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Sunday, March 5, 2006 3:59 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by espeefoamer

They might buy P40s or P42s from GE if they can't get EMDs.


[banghead] Metra looked at the GE P42 (et al) units back a few years and as I recall even borrowed a few Amtrak units for a few days of tests and found they did not have the accelleration to be suitable in keeping the grueling commuter schedules. When I ride on Metra occassionally I will sometines pass the time keeping score as to how good they are on the BNSF line in keeping to their schedules and believe me, they are REALLY, REALLY GOOD as they are seldom more than one minute over or under schedule and usually RIGHT ON THE MONEY. The old saying "you can set your watch by those trains" really holds true on the Metra BNSF line out to Aurora.

Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Sunday, March 5, 2006 3:26 PM
They might buy P40s or P42s from GE if they can't get EMDs.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 4, 2006 10:38 PM
EMD doesn't make the F59PHI's anymore. Carl the Problem is on the UP-NW/N Lines.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 4, 2006 10:23 PM
what about F59PHI's and such???
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Saturday, March 4, 2006 9:52 PM
The UP West line isn't the problem (think about it--that's one of the busiest freight lines in the country, with stack trains and coal trains; it wouldn't have any problem with those new units!). It's the other two lines, Northwest and North, that have the bridges that couldn't take them. As these lines use power interchangably, UP wouldn't keep one set of power for the west line and another bigger fleet for the other two.

Over the past several years, some of these bridges have been replaced. There are still plenty more to go. We'd probably see more new units delivered for service on the BNSF line, with the newest F40s (the "Winnebagos") being cascaded over to UP service if necessary. Bridge replacement, however, is probably inevitable somewhere along the line--keep in mind that these older bridges are no picnic for the people traversing the streets beneath them, either.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Omaha-ish, Nebraska
  • 703 posts
Posted by DrummingTrainfan on Saturday, March 4, 2006 9:32 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Murphy Siding

Rebuild the F40's, perhaps?


I was thinking of that, but that would be temporary. The F40's are going to wear out eventually.
    GIFs from http://www.trainweb.org/mccann/offer.htm -Erik, the displaced CNW, Bears, White Sox, Northern Illnois Huskies, Amtrak and Metra fan.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, March 4, 2006 9:21 PM
Rebuild the F40's, perhaps?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy