Trains.com

Cost of locomotive

6056 views
30 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,505 posts
Posted by caldreamer on Tuesday, February 22, 2022 3:38 PM

Sean Graham White reported in his Jan-Feb 2022 Loco Notes that BNSF will purchase 103 C44-9W's that are 2022 lease returns (The lease will expire).  These engines are twenty to twenty five years old, but BNSF needs the power and they apparntly are in good mechanical condition.  I wonder what the cost for these engines will be.  Does anyone have any ideas as to the cost per unit.

                

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 19, 2006 2:21 PM
Yes ,I know that it is unusual to have 1 share but they are somewhat expensive.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Lakewood NY
  • 679 posts
Posted by tpatrick on Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:10 PM
Here's an interesting comparison. Eric Hirsimaki, in "The Nickel Plate Years," describes the NKP's last purchase of steam power in 1948. They ordered 10 S-3 Berkshires from Lima at a cost of $226,315 each. Using an inflation calculator, that computes to $1,872,279 in 2005 dollars.

Before choosing the Berks, NKP tested a 4-unit set of EMD F-3s, to see if they might be better. Hirsimaki says the diesels "couldn't provide any substantial economies or improvements in performance." Not only that, they cost $568,000 per set. That's $4,699,001 in 2005 dollars. Chalk one up for steam.

On the passenger side, NKP saw plenty of reason to replace their Hudsons with something new. They settled on on a fleet of 11 Alco PAs, at a price of $204,099 each.That is $1,931,630 in 2005.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 18, 2006 8:04 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by TheJGuy

Railroads are some of the best ways to spend money in the stock market. I own a share of UP for like $91 and NS for like $60. Both railroads are beating Advance Auto Parts in the stock market !!


UP closed today at 95.98 per share.

NS closed today at 56.35 per share. That is higher than it has been in over six years.

It is also very unusual to buy a single share...

nice try though...

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 18, 2006 4:18 PM
Railroads are some of the best ways to spend money in the stock market. I own a share of UP for like $91 and NS for like $60. Both railroads are beating Advance Auto Parts in the stock market !!
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:16 AM
Leases go well back into the steam era - although then many of them were for rolling stock. You used to see "trust" plates on the side of cars. These equipment trust arrangments were actually equipment leases with the same depreciation advantage for the lease holders as was expalined in prior posts.

dd
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:53 AM
Well I remember that the Lehigh Valley paid $3 million for 12 Alco C-420 in 1963. I say you might get 1 or 2 for that price today
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 4:14 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edbenton

mike your prices are low a 737 goes for 77 million and a 767 is 155-185 million a 777 tops out at 225 million a 747 is 240 million fully loaded


That is not what American paid. If you buy one you might pay those prices, we bought over 100 737's, 25 757's, 10 767's and 43 777's in the late 90's. I was involved in the 737's and know for a fact we did not pay nothing near 77 million. I will acknowledge that the prices I am speaking of are over 7 yrs old.

Anyway they are quite expensive.

Mike in Tulsa
BNSF Cherokee Sub
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Monday, February 20, 2006 9:41 AM
mike your prices are low a 737 goes for 77 million and a 767 is 155-185 million a 777 tops out at 225 million a 747 is 240 million fully loaded
Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Milwaukee, WI
  • 103 posts
Posted by ericmanke on Monday, February 20, 2006 6:52 AM
How long has these lease arrangements been in existance? I would assume that they haven't been in existance throughout dieseldom's history. Has anyone paid cash or personally financed a locomotive purchase in the past 25 years? I was also wondering if these 15 year lease arrangements are also used on used locomotives, like the ex conrail GP38s picked up by Katy or ex Conrail GP40s picked up by the Rio Grande, or the many SD45s that used to be on the Wisconsin Central. Even used locomotives are a big capital outlay for a regional railroad with tight cash.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Appleton, WI
  • 275 posts
Posted by tormadel on Monday, February 20, 2006 2:07 AM
I have done a bunch of searches to find information about the value of locomotives in todays market and have had very limited success finding anything out. I'm not entirely sure why this information seems to be top secret. Maybe they don't want 1 railroad feeling the guy next door is getting a better deal or something. EMD and GE have lots of performance data on the locomotives they're currently offering but nothing about costs. Now granted, the average Joe isn't going to get on they're website and order a custom SD70M-2 like he might a Ford Focus, but it is possible. Hey if Bill gates wants to spend $2mill for a nice loco to decorate his lawn would either company really have a problem with that? heh.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, February 9, 2006 12:44 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by traintownofcowee

Railroads must be one the most richest companies in the world.
Prices of locomotives, rolling stock, track, stations, buildings, m.o.w. equipment, equal a lot of cash!
Owning a railroad isn't easy.
Makes ya wonder how they did it then, and what if we can do it know?
You should play Railroad Tycoon 3 to see what its like!

[:)][8D][:D][^][?][:O][8)][|)][:P][;)][alien][X-)][%-)][(-D][swg][{(-_-)}]


You should see the costs involved in running an airline! one airplane costs between $30 million and 50 million for a 737/757 or A320 and 40 million to 70 million for a 767/777 or A340....the A380 is quoted at $100 million per copy. American Airlines has just over 700 aircraft, you do the math. Oh and then there is the fuel, single largest cost for the airline.

I know BNSF has several thousand locomotives, but the overall costs are less per unit than an aircraft.

Mike in Tulsa
BNSF Cherokee Sub
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, February 7, 2006 1:54 PM
Current purchase price for GE EVO DC's is approx. $1.6M, GE 44 AC are approx $2M

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 370 posts
Posted by artpeterson on Tuesday, February 7, 2006 12:40 PM
The problem with the sale-leaseback deals is that the government keeps flip-flopping on whether or not they're legal. Right now, we're in a period where sale-leaseback is not allowed, but it will change back after a while. CTA has done the same thing as DART, selling and leasing back recent orders of rail cars. They also did the same thing with the physical assets of the Green and Orange Lines a few years back.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, February 7, 2006 12:29 PM
An interesting twist is a government owned transit authority. Being a government institution they do not pay any income tax, hence, depreciation is a non item to them. What our transit system did was to sell our light rail cars to a leasing company then lease them back. We made 8% on our money this way as the bank gave us a good lease rate as they could depreciate the units. The lease was for 30 years and had the standard clauses about maintaining the equipment etc.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 6, 2006 11:44 AM
Nobody mentioned maintenance of these leased units. I think that these GEs are involved in a maintenance contract with GE as well. I know that GE has facilities on the property manned by BNSF crews paid by GE. I was told that an ES44DC goes for 2.5M
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Monday, February 6, 2006 10:51 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by doghouse

Zardoz, how much for a candy apple red paint and a set of twice pipes?


Don't forget about the custom interior with the fuzzy dice and the dingle balls...
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • 910 posts
Posted by arbfbe on Sunday, February 5, 2006 11:54 PM
Railroad accounting.
Railroads have lots of investments in rights of way, rails, ties, signal systems, buildings, mow equipment and on and on. All of it has some depreciation to it. Locomotives and freight cars carry a lot of depreciation as well. There reaches a point where the annual value of the depreciation may exceed the revenues of the railroad. That amount of depreciation cannot be written off. It is lost to the railroad. Banks and other financial institutions do not own much capital equipment, a few buildings and some computers and office equipment. They do not get a large write off for depreciation. Now if the bank buys the equipment like locomotives and freight cars they can lease them to the railroad. The bank or other financial institution gets to claim the full depretiation against revenues from the lease. The cost of that depretiation is figured into the value of the lease and so the railroad reimburses the bank for the depretiation. So the railroad can expense the cost of the lease against earnings for a full deduction against earnings. In effect, they get to write off the cost of depretiation in the lease payment even if they would not be able to do that if they owned the unit outright.

The lease allows the railroad an out if they want newer units at the end of the lease. They are not stuck with a bunch of old locomotives when newer ones are coming on line. If they do decide to keep the older model then the original lease will have a buy out price predetermined at the signing of the lease. It could be a good deal and the railroad will buy the locomotives or it could be a bad deal and the railroad can send the units back to the leasing company and let them deal with them. If the railroad does keep them, they will likely go for a major overhaul. In such cases they are likely to sell the units to a financial institution who will have them rebuilt and then lease the units back to the railroad again.

All the FURX units running around the BNSF these days are a pretty good example of the locomotive market today. BN used First Union (Bank?) to purchase and lease a lot of SD40-2s in the 1980s for the expansion of the coal traffic out of the Powder River Basin. Now it is 2000 and the SD40-2s are yesterday's technology but are still in pretty good shape. BNSF reaches the end of the lease with the SD40-2s but wants to buy Dash9-44CW units for their fuel economy and improved electronics and electrical systems. So they let the SD40-2s go back on the lease to First Union, a part of Wachovia Group and then sign a short term lease to continue to use the units to haul freight. So now as long as the BNSF is short of new diesels, FURX has a place to earn an income from their capital investment and BNSF has a nice place to lease reasonably reliable units. If BNSF gets enough new units to run their railroad or the economy turns south, they just send the units back to First Union and get them off their property. The will be First Union's problems and BNSF will not have all these "assets" in their inventory not earning a return for the investors. That makes their bottom line look better to analystists.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Sunday, February 5, 2006 6:44 PM
Awww...
Go old school...flames and pin stripes...well, at least the GEs have the flame part already!

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Sunday, February 5, 2006 6:41 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by doghouse

Zardoz, how much for a candy apple red paint and a set of twice pipes?

According to the article in TRAINS magazine, this month, you coud probably get it done... The cost was given at between $15,000.00 to $27,000.00. I suspect the multi-coat candyapple red would be somewhere over that price range, due to multiple coats and the final clear coat...No doubt it would be a knock out of a paint job[:p][:p][:p][^]

 

 


 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, February 5, 2006 6:36 PM
D.C. Traction is $1.5 Million at least
A.C. Traction is $2.2 Million at least
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • 93 posts
Posted by prospekt mira on Sunday, February 5, 2006 6:34 PM
Germanium. Rather than solely tax, leasing provides a manner in which to ensure your cash flow is better managed. Rather than incurring a large debt to purchase an engine and recovering that through a capital cost allowance (ie government mandated depreciation) over the projected life of the asset (also government mandatted) with any untaken CCA being written off in the year of disposal, they have turned to leasing (as first developed by airlines). Here the cost of each year is contractually manadated and fully expensed for tax each year, but there is no inital cash requirement and no tax effect in the year of disposal. The cost of leasing is actually a little higher than the cost of a purchase for individuals (like those who purchase cars), but lower for some financial firms (ie the subsiduaries) than operarting companies whose results tend to be more volatile.
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Sunday, February 5, 2006 3:50 PM
Leases that run 15 years are usually for the "lower end" power. Higher-tech units like GE AC6000CWs, ES44ACs,EMD SD70/2ACs, have ten year leases, as technology may render them obsolete within that time frame. Units to watch are former Conrail SD80s, which are ten years old, and obsolete! Their 20-cylinder engine doesn't "cut the mustard" in today's economy. Norfolk Southern may have already sent them back to their lessor, or will do so soon. CSX may make their intentions known. Do not bet on their picking up the NS ones, however, as they are leaning toward SD70/2ACs, and more ES44DCs. The other equally compelling reason that has the NS units being "returned": they are orphans, (only AC traction motor units on the roster). A product like the GE ES44DC or EMDs SD70/2DC will be more likely to have a 15 year lease as they are "assigned" to "longer term" jobs, where they won't become obsolete as quickly as higher-tech power.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Hampshire, England
  • 290 posts
Posted by germanium on Sunday, February 5, 2006 11:07 AM
Originally posted by ndbprr

Due to tax law and general bookkeeping requirements most railroads do not buy their engines. They lease them from companies that own them. I have an MBA and the logic is way beyond my understanding but there is a financial advantage to operating in this manner.

I'm missing your point here - Can you enlighten me ? I would have thought (probably mistakenly) that leasing rather than buying outright would avoid an uneven bottom line over the course of the lease ??
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Where it's cold.
  • 555 posts
Posted by doghouse on Saturday, February 4, 2006 8:29 PM
Zardoz, how much for a candy apple red paint and a set of twice pipes?
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Saturday, February 4, 2006 4:46 PM
It also depends on the options selected.


DVD player costs about $300 due to anti-vibration housing
Wide-screen tv costs about $2000, for the same reasons
Leather recliners are included if you get both the dvd and tv
On-Star is not available on anything except a GM product
Airbags and anti-lock brakes are not available
Convertible top costs over $10,000 (not available in Canada)
Glasspak exhaust system not available in California
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, February 4, 2006 4:37 PM
I THINK A NEW SD70MAC COST ABOUT 2.2 MILLON
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Franklin, NC
  • 166 posts
Posted by traintownofcowee on Saturday, February 4, 2006 3:11 PM
Railroads must be one the most richest companies in the world.
Prices of locomotives, rolling stock, track, stations, buildings, m.o.w. equipment, equal a lot of cash!
Owning a railroad isn't easy.
Makes ya wonder how they did it then, and what if we can do it know?
You should play Railroad Tycoon 3 to see what its like!

[:)][8D][:D][^][?][:O][8)][|)][:P][;)][alien][X-)][%-)][(-D][swg][{(-_-)}]

Take a Ride on the Scenic Line!

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Saturday, February 4, 2006 12:45 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ndbprr

Due to tax law and general bookkeeping requirements most railroads do not buy their engines. They lease them from companies that own them. I have an MBA and the logic is way beyond my understanding but there is a financial advantage to operating in this manner. So a railroad may have 100 million dollars in lease payments per year rather than a capital expenditure of 100 million dollars. As the engines get bigger the expenditure stays the same so figure they are willing to spend so many dollars per horsepower rented. The leases typically last fifteen years at which time both companies have to start anew lease since the engine is fully depreciated. It will be interesting to see how many of these monsters wind up in the scrap yards at the end of their leases since shortline and class 2's have very little usage for them. To get to your original question probably more than a million dollars per engine out the door in the paint of your choice subject to gadgets and doodads specific to your railroad.

Just a little dip in the convoluted sea of tax law, not only do a lot of corporations do leasing deals on their equipment, they fund[ and/or control] the subsidiaries that do the leasing. It is mostly about taxes and insurance liabilities. The layering provided by the introduction of a second party in such deals protect the major player against the eventuality of a "legal situation" that might arise in the case of an accident. Not to mention the advantages of the tax write-offs for expenses of operation of said equipment.
Off topic: In some cases, large corporations that are 'self-insured' hire another firm to administer their liability, thus ducking some exposure to the risks of malactions by their officers, employees or equipment, thus some expenses can be charged of as operational expenses for doing business .

 

 


 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy