Trains.com

UP & Double Diesels

8792 views
32 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Thursday, January 26, 2006 7:57 AM
there are operational limits as to how many locomotives can be used at the head end of a train. UP is frequently at that limit on Sherman Hill and Echo Canyon. I have seen two trains with 8 engines in the last 3 months. The "double diesels" were one approach to addressing their horsepower needs. The 8500 series 6000 hp units were another approach. I am wondering that with the improved reliability of today's locomotive, a double engined unit might again be practical.

dd
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 26, 2006 7:33 AM
I suspect it was because they needed the horsepower. UP had been buying GP B-units, including GP9B's and GP30B's and running long strings of GP's on fast freights. The DD35 was essentially a GP35 A and B unit on a single frame - same number of traction motors per prime mover. The Centenials were the first single unit diesels to match the horsepower of a Big Boy so that much horsepower in a single unit wasn't new to UP. Even with that much power, Centenials often ran in pairs with a fast SD40 in between. The U50's were 'recycled' by GE from the early gas turbines.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Wednesday, January 25, 2006 11:09 PM
The idea was that certain operating costs are based on the number of locomotives needed rather than how many engines each locomotive has. ( i.e. only one brakestand, two less trucks, only one cab, etc.). It turned out that the complexity and operational inflexibility costs outweighed the savings. Only the Espee followed the UP, because you needed First Class trackage to handle the very heavy locomotives. Many railroads could have operated the double-diesels over some parts of their systems, but only the UP could operate them over most of their mainlines. Especially in the timeframe when these locomotives operated. For many railroads this was a time of deferred maintenance.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
UP & Double Diesels
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, January 25, 2006 10:48 PM

What exactly did Union Pacific gain by buying the "double diesel" engines, such as EMD DDA35, ALCO C855, and GE U-50? (Forgive me, I pulled model numbers from memory.) Was there really anything to gain from ordering semi-custom units, that couldn't be accomplished by just buying "off the shelf " models, and hooking 2 of them together? It seems that if it was such a great idea other railroads besides Southern Pacific, would have bought into the idea too?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy